`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Monday, December 12, 2016

NAJIB & HADI’S NEW ‘BOLEHLAND’: WHEN MUSLIMS INTERFERE, IT’S RIGHTEOUS. WHEN NON-MUSLIMS INTERFERE, IT’S SEDITIOUS?

PAS leader Khairuddin Aman Razali is claiming that non-Muslims interfering with state Islamic laws are a threat to the Muslims who make up the majority of the country’s population.
Does he mean to say that non-Muslims do not have any rights over their children who are still minors when one of the parents decides to convert to Islam, in all probability to smite the other parent over some irreconcilable differences between them, as he is then able to snatch his minor children and hide safely behind the curtain of religion, thus torturing the other parent who invariably is always the woman and who will not get any help from the state?
Could the pious people tell us whether the Prophet had given refugee to husbands who had abandoned their wives and snatched their minor children away from the mothers?
Did not the Prophet Mohammad say “to you yours and to me mine”?
Wasn’t the prophet talking about peoples beliefs (call it religion if you prefer)?
If the Prophet himself did not dictate that everyone must become his followers, then whose instructions are some of his followers following in demanding that one parent who becomes a Muslim can convert his minor children without the consent of the other parent?
Did Muslims not interfere in the affairs of the non-Muslims when they snatched dead bodies from funeral homes? Did they not interfere in a non-Muslim wedding when they pulled a bride out in the midst of the ceremony, supposedly to verify whether she was a Muslim?
Why destroy statues in places of worship of the non-Muslims? Why demand that crosses be taken down from schools and other buildings and that “crosses” appearing in the designs of houses be removed?
If the Prophet himself did not dictate that everyone must become his followers, then whose instructions are some of his followers following in demanding that one parent who becomes a Muslim can convert his minor children without the consent of the other parent?
Are all these not interferences in the affairs of the non-Muslims?
So is Khairuddin Aman Razali saying that the Muslims being the majority can interfere in the affairs of the non-Muslims by using their majority status to make laws that “legalise” such interference?
When Muslims do what the prophet neither did nor ordered them to do against the non-Muslims, they are clearly interfering in and with the affairs of the non-Muslims. That they are the majority in the country does not legitimise their non-Islamic actions against the non-Muslims.
WRITER: RAVINDER SINGH

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.