In a first by Putrajaya, top civil servants on Tuesday personally addressed media queries about problems raised in the second series of the Auditor-General's Report 2013.
The briefing, arranged by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Paul Low, was held at the Institute of Integrity in Kuala Lumpur.
Opposition MPs PKR’s Sim Tze Tzin and PAS Raja Kamarul Bahrin Raja Ahmad Shah (left) had attempted to attend the briefing but were told to leave.
After asking those who were not from the media or civil service to raise their hands, Low told them to leave the room,
However, DAP MP Ong Kian Ming, who was also present, did not raise his hand and remained throughout the briefing.
Below is his statement on the experience:
'Taklimat umum'
‘Before the start of the briefing, the minister asked all who were not civil servants or members of the media to leave the briefing room. He specifically asked for MPs to leave the room.
The MP for Bayan Baru, Sim Tze Sim and the MP for Kuala Terengganu, Raja Kamarul Bahrin Shah, who identified themselves as Mps, were then asked to leave the briefing room. I did not identify myself as an MP and hence, was not asked to leave the room. I stayed on for the entire briefing.
The invitation to the briefing which I received from another source stated that this was a public briefing or taklimat umum. Nowhere was it stated that this briefing was only restricted to the media and that MPs were not allowed to attend.
In the reply slip, there was no mention that this briefing was only for the media. Furthermore, I had emailed my registration for this event and had gotten a positive reply from the office of Paul Low (right). I attended this event in good faith and was surprised that the minister asked MPs in attendance to leave the room.
Given that I had already registered for this event and received a positive reply from the minister’s office, I did not see any need for me to leave the event and as such, I did not identify myself as an MP.
Bad faith
Even if the minister’s office had made an error in not clarifying that this event was only open to the media, he acted in bad faith when he asked for MPs already present to leave the room.
In a subsequent statement, the minister tried to explain why the MPs were asked to leave the room. Among the reasons was the following:
“It was a matter of principle. MPs already have a legitimate platform to raise questions on the AG’s report during each sitting of Parliament. Again, this event was meant solely for the press – and we hope that the boundaries of this promising platform will be understood and respected by all parties concerned.”
The minister should be aware that the AG’s report was tabled only one week after the current Parliament sitting started. Our parliamentary questions are submitted two weeks before the sitting starts which means we have no way to include the items found in the AG’s report in our questions.
Furthermore, there is no separate or special session in parliament to debate the AG’s report.
Another briefing?
Each MP does not have the opportunity to raise specific questions to specific ministers or the secretaries-general in Parliament. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is only comprised of a small number of MPs and even then, the PAC hearings are not open to the press nor to other MPs who are not part of the PAC.
Hence, such an event would have been an excellent opportunity for MPs from both sides to ask their specific questions on the latest AG report.
The minister, at this briefing, said that he would organise a similar session with the MPs. We hold him to his word that he would organise another briefing comprising all the secretaries-general of all the ministries including the chief secretary for all the MPs.
His failure to do so would signify the lack of desire to have an open, transparent and honest discussion and debate about the National Auditor’s Report and to combat corruption and wastage more generally.'
The briefing, arranged by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Paul Low, was held at the Institute of Integrity in Kuala Lumpur.
Opposition MPs PKR’s Sim Tze Tzin and PAS Raja Kamarul Bahrin Raja Ahmad Shah (left) had attempted to attend the briefing but were told to leave.After asking those who were not from the media or civil service to raise their hands, Low told them to leave the room,
However, DAP MP Ong Kian Ming, who was also present, did not raise his hand and remained throughout the briefing.
Below is his statement on the experience:
'Taklimat umum'
‘Before the start of the briefing, the minister asked all who were not civil servants or members of the media to leave the briefing room. He specifically asked for MPs to leave the room.
The MP for Bayan Baru, Sim Tze Sim and the MP for Kuala Terengganu, Raja Kamarul Bahrin Shah, who identified themselves as Mps, were then asked to leave the briefing room. I did not identify myself as an MP and hence, was not asked to leave the room. I stayed on for the entire briefing.
The invitation to the briefing which I received from another source stated that this was a public briefing or taklimat umum. Nowhere was it stated that this briefing was only restricted to the media and that MPs were not allowed to attend.In the reply slip, there was no mention that this briefing was only for the media. Furthermore, I had emailed my registration for this event and had gotten a positive reply from the office of Paul Low (right). I attended this event in good faith and was surprised that the minister asked MPs in attendance to leave the room.
Given that I had already registered for this event and received a positive reply from the minister’s office, I did not see any need for me to leave the event and as such, I did not identify myself as an MP.
Bad faith
Even if the minister’s office had made an error in not clarifying that this event was only open to the media, he acted in bad faith when he asked for MPs already present to leave the room.In a subsequent statement, the minister tried to explain why the MPs were asked to leave the room. Among the reasons was the following:
“It was a matter of principle. MPs already have a legitimate platform to raise questions on the AG’s report during each sitting of Parliament. Again, this event was meant solely for the press – and we hope that the boundaries of this promising platform will be understood and respected by all parties concerned.”
The minister should be aware that the AG’s report was tabled only one week after the current Parliament sitting started. Our parliamentary questions are submitted two weeks before the sitting starts which means we have no way to include the items found in the AG’s report in our questions.
Furthermore, there is no separate or special session in parliament to debate the AG’s report.
Another briefing?
Each MP does not have the opportunity to raise specific questions to specific ministers or the secretaries-general in Parliament. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is only comprised of a small number of MPs and even then, the PAC hearings are not open to the press nor to other MPs who are not part of the PAC.
Hence, such an event would have been an excellent opportunity for MPs from both sides to ask their specific questions on the latest AG report.The minister, at this briefing, said that he would organise a similar session with the MPs. We hold him to his word that he would organise another briefing comprising all the secretaries-general of all the ministries including the chief secretary for all the MPs.
His failure to do so would signify the lack of desire to have an open, transparent and honest discussion and debate about the National Auditor’s Report and to combat corruption and wastage more generally.'
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.