`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!

 



 

21 JUNE 2026

Friday, July 31, 2026

Tegur, nasihat tetapi jangan tuduh kerajaan tak buat apa-apa, kata Anwar

 Perdana menteri berkata kerajaan terbuka terima teguran membina dan rayu beri ruang untuk baiki kekurangan.

Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim ketika hadir ke Majlis Kuala Pilah Berselawat dan Munajat Perdana Negeri Sembilan di Dataran Melang, Kuala Pilah.
KUALA PILAH:
Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim berkata beliau sentiasa terbuka menerima teguran dan nasihat, namun meminta pengkritik supaya tidak mendakwa kerajaan pimpinannya tidak melakukan apa-apa untuk rakyat.

Anwar berkata, setiap kelemahan pentadbiran wajar ditegur secara membina agar dapat diperbaiki, sambil menegaskan kerajaan melaksanakan pelbagai inisiatif bagi mengurangkan beban rakyat dan memperkukuh ekonomi negara.

“Tegurlah saya. Berilah nasihat. Tetapi janganlah mengatakan kerajaan tidak melakukan apa-apa.

“Jika ada kelemahan, berilah teguran yang membina dan berilah ruang kepada kami untuk memperbaiki kekurangan tersebut,” katanya ketika berucap dalam program Kuala Pilah berselawat dan munajat.

Anwar juga berkata kerajaan sentiasa prihatin dengan masalah kos barangan dan kos sara hidup rakyat yang terus meningkat susulan tekanan ekonomi global ketika ini.

Katanya, antara usaha kerajaan adalah menetap harga minyak RON95 pada harga RM1.99 seliter walaupun terpaksa menanggung subsidi hingga RM40 bilion hingga RM45 bilion setahun.

“Sebab itu, setiap kali mengisi minyak ingatlah kerajaan menanggung sebahagian besar kos tersebut demi mengurangkan beban rakyat,” katanya.

Dalam pada itu, Anwar berkata matlamat pentadbirannya bukan sekadar melaksanakan dasar pembangunan, tetapi turut mengangkat martabat orang Melayu yang memerlukan pembelaan serta memperkasakan Islam.

“Matlamat kita ialah mengangkat martabat orang Melayu yang memerlukan pembelaan serta memartabatkan Islam melalui amal dan tindakan, bukan sekadar kata-kata,” katanya. - FMT

Uefa nations vote unanimously to boycott World Cup over Fifa stake sale plans

 Member associations say no national teams will participate in Fifa competitions unless plans to sell stakes in Fifa's tournament subsidiary are abandoned.

Uefa said the World Cup should not be treated as an investment product. (Uefa pic)
PARIS:
Uefa’s member associations have unanimously voted to boycott the World Cup and other Fifa competitions in protest at Fifa’s plan to sell stakes to external investors in a subsidiary that will run the global governing body’s tournaments, European soccer’s governing body said following a virtual meeting on Thursday.

World soccer’s ruling body said on Tuesday it plans to create a US$20 billion subsidiary to run the World Cup and its other events and will offer stakes of up to 20% in it to external investors.

“No Uefa national teams will participate in any Fifa competition for so long as these proposals remain alive, unless this proposal has been abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances have been given that Fifa will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership,” Uefa said in a statement.

“The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product.

“It is one of football’s greatest sporting legacies. It has been built over generations by players, national teams and supporters across every continent,” Uefa added.

“No part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale,” it added. - FMT

No ‘sakau’ proof but RCI doesn’t clear TH leaders, says Syed Saddiq

 The Muar MP says the report should not be used to accuse politicians without proof or downplay the pilgrim fund’s governance issues.

SYED SADDIQ
Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman urged the government to clarify whether the forensic audits into 14 troubled TH investments had been completed.
PETALING JAYA:
The royal commission of inquiry report on Lembaga Tabung Haji may not have proven any political leader embezzled funds, but that does not absolve those responsible for the governance failures that caused major losses, says Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman.

The Muar MP said the report should not be used to accuse politicians of theft without proof, but should also not be used to downplay the serious failures it uncovered.

“The report does not say that Political Leader A embezzled billions of ringgit. It does not. What it does show is billions of ringgit in losses.

“These losses were caused by inexperienced and unqualified leaders being placed in positions where they made investment decisions that resulted in billions of ringgit in losses,” he said in a YouTube live tonight.

Syed Saddiq noted the RCI was not empowered to determine whether corruption had taken place, as it lacked the investigative powers of the police or the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission.

“Only by following the money through forensic audits can we know whether there was corruption, abuse of power or simply poor investment decisions,” he said.

He was referring to one of the RCI’s recommendations that forensic audits should be carried out on 14 troubled investments, including TH Indo Plantations, Trurich Resources and FGV Bhd.

Syed Saddiq urged the government to clarify whether audits and investigations into the investments had been completed.

“If the forensic audits have been completed, make the findings public. If they have not, carry them out as soon as possible,” he said.

His comments came amid mixed reactions to the RCI report, including from Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh, who appeared to challenge Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim last week to prove claims that theft had taken place at Tabung Haji.

Akmal wrote on Facebook: “So who are the Umno politicians involved and said to have ‘sakau’ (stolen) (Tabung Haji funds)?”

He said the report instead found fault with the fund’s weak management, and questioned whether providing high dividends to depositors and subsidising haj costs could be considered “sakau”.

Syed Saddiq rejected the argument that TH’s financial problems were not serious simply because depositors continued to receive hibah (profit payments) and haj assistance.

He said the losses did not disappear and should be addressed through measures involving future depositors, taxpayers and subsequent governments. - FMT

Thursday, July 30, 2026

Palm, soy and sunflower: Who will feed the world?

 

THE global edible oils market, worth hundreds of billions of dollars and still growing, is no longer a quiet commodity trade.

It has become a geopolitical chessboard, an environmental battleground and a test of which agribusiness giants can outmanoeuvre one another as the world’s appetite for cooking oil continues to grow.

Demand is rising, driven by population growth in Asia and Africa, expanding middle-class consumption and the reality that vegetable oils are now embedded in everything from fried chicken to biodiesel.

By 2030, many forecasts suggest demand could outstrip supply by millions of metric tonnes. So how are palm, soybean, canola, sunflower and emerging niche oils competing for market share? More importantly, what will determine the winner?

Palm oil remains the undisputed king. Nearly 60% of globally traded vegetable oil comes from oil palm, and for good reason. It is remarkably efficient, yielding three to four tonnes of oil per hectare compared with soybean’s 0.4 tonnes.

That productivity keeps prices low, making palm oil the preferred choice for processed foods, cosmetics and increasingly, biofuels.

Soybean oil ranks second, but its competitive advantage is unique. It is essentially a co-product of soybean meal production. Every tonne of soybean meal protein yields about 180kg of oil.

As global demand for meat rises, soybean crushing expands almost automatically, flooding the market with oil whether demand exists or not. This makes soybean oil an inevitable competitor, particularly in the Americas and China.

Yet soybean oil has its own challenges. Vast monoculture plantations in Brazil, Argentina and the United States (US) have made soy a symbol of deforestation, soil degradation and heavy pesticide use.

Unlike palm oil, soybean oil also requires hydrogenation for greater shelf stability, a process historically associated with trans fats.

Although high-oleic genetically modified varieties have addressed much of this concern, soybean oil’s long-term growth may depend as much on demand for animal feed as on cooking oil itself.

For now, however, it remains the preferred biodiesel feedstock in the US under renewable fuel policies.

Sunflower oil briefly became a geopolitical casualty when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Almost half of global sunflower oil exports were disrupted, sending prices soaring and forcing major importers such as India to seek alternative supplies. The crisis also elevated Turkey’s role as an important supplier.

Premium oils such as olive and avocado continue to gain popularity among affluent, health-conscious consumers, but they will never feed the masses.

Olive oil’s recent price surge, driven by severe droughts in Spain and Italy, illustrates how vulnerable these premium products are to climate shocks.

Coconut oil, once hailed as a health food, has also lost momentum amid continuing debate over saturated fat. These niche oils compete on wellness and branding rather than volume, leaving the real contest to palm, soybean and sunflower.

Beyond yields and prices, government policy increasingly shapes the market. The European Union is phasing out food-based biofuels under its Renewable Energy Directive, while Indonesia continues expanding its palm-based biodiesel programme from B40 towards B50.

The US periodically adjusts soybean biodiesel mandates. Each policy shift diverts millions of tonnes of edible oil from kitchens to fuel tanks, influencing prices and global trade flows.

Consumers increasingly demand sustainable products, but many remain unwilling to pay higher prices. Certified sustainable palm oil costs more to produce, yet premiums remain limited.

Meanwhile, tighter European regulations are pushing Southeast Asian producers to expand into Africa and the Middle East, creating a more fragmented global market rather than a level playing field.

Climate change is adding another layer of uncertainty. Palm depends on consistent rainfall, soybean on predictable growing seasons, while sunflower and olive are particularly vulnerable to prolonged heatwaves.

As El Niño and La Niña events become more intense, production swings are becoming more frequent. The competition is increasingly about resilience as much as productivity.

Consumer perceptions continue to evolve as well. For decades, saturated fats such as palm and coconut were widely criticised before attention shifted towards polyunsaturated oils such as soybean and sunflower, and later to monounsaturated oils such as canola and olive.

The next major shift, driven by growing scepticism towards ultra-processed foods, could reshape demand once again by favouring cold-pressed and minimally processed oils.

The reality is that the world cannot satisfy its growing demand for edible oil without palm oil. Its productivity remains unmatched.

Yet the industry’s reluctance to embrace greater transparency, whether through blockchain traceability, stronger certification or better inclusion of smallholders, continues to fuel concerns over deforestation and sustainability.

Soybean oil will continue to grow alongside rising global demand for animal protein. Sunflower oil will remain an important regional player but is unlikely to provide the scale or resilience needed to dominate global markets.

Ultimately, the real contest is not between palm, soybean and sunflower. It is between sustainability and short-term profit.

The battle for the world’s kitchen is about far more than market share. It is about whether we can feed eight billion people without cooking the planet. 

The author, Professor Datuk Dr Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an Adjunct Professor at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya.

The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of  MMKtT.

- Focus Malaysia.

Think skipping meals means skipping your toothbrush? Think again

 

WE have all had days like this. Perhaps you’re fasting, feeling unwell or simply too busy to eat. As bedtime approaches, a familiar thought crosses your mind.

“I hardly ate anything today. Surely I can skip brushing my teeth just this once.”

It sounds perfectly reasonable. After all, if there is little or no food left in your mouth, what exactly is there to clean?

Surprisingly, the answer has very little to do with food.

Many people think brushing is simply about removing leftover food. In reality, your mouth remains active every minute of the day, whether you are eating or not. Saliva continues to flow, the lining of your mouth constantly renews itself, and millions of bacteria continue to live, grow and interact on the surfaces of your teeth.

That is why your toothbrush still has work to do, even on days when your appetite does not.

Almost immediately after brushing, your teeth become coated with a thin protective layer called the pellicle.

Formed naturally from saliva and other substances in the mouth, it helps protect the teeth from drying out. At the same time, it provides bacteria with a surface to attach themselves.

Our mouths naturally contain hundreds of different species of bacteria. Most are harmless and many even help maintain a healthy balance within the mouth.

Once they attach to the pellicle, they begin organising into communities, with different species settling where conditions best suit their needs.

Together, these bacteria form what dentists call a biofilm. Think of it as a bustling neighbourhood rather than isolated bacteria. They communicate, protect one another and continue multiplying.

Left undisturbed, this community becomes increasingly mature and more difficult to remove.

(Image: Unsplash/National Cancer Institute)

This is why brushing is not simply about removing food. It is about disrupting the biofilm before it develops into something that can damage your teeth and gums.

When biofilm is removed regularly through proper brushing, beneficial bacteria help keep harmful ones under control. But when brushing becomes inconsistent, that balance begins to shift.

Some bacteria produce acids that attack the tooth surface, increasing the risk of tooth decay. Others trigger inflammation that damages the gums and, over time, the bone supporting the teeth.

Tooth decay and gum disease remain the world’s most common oral diseases, and both begin with the same biofilm that naturally forms every day.

In other words, plaque continues to develop whether or not you have eaten a large meal. Food can accelerate the process, but it is not the reason plaque forms in the first place.

That is why daily brushing remains essential. For people with healthy teeth and gums, brushing gently twice a day for at least two minutes, together with cleaning between the teeth using dental floss, is generally enough to remove biofilm before it causes problems.

People with gum disease often require more thorough cleaning because bone loss and receding gums create spaces that an ordinary toothbrush cannot reach. In such cases, interdental brushes and single-tufted brushes are often recommended to clean these areas more effectively.

Depending on your condition, your dentist or periodontist may also recommend additional oral care products tailored to your individual needs.

The next time you visit your dentist, don’t just ask whether your teeth are free of cavities. Ask about the health of your gums as well. Healthy gums provide the foundation that helps your teeth last a lifetime.

So the next time you find yourself thinking, “I hardly ate today, so I probably don’t need to brush,” remember that your mouth never really takes a day off. Neither do the bacteria that live there.

Your toothbrush isn’t just cleaning away food. Every day, it quietly disrupts a microscopic community before it has the chance to become a much bigger problem. 

The author is a Consultant Periodontist and Associate Professor at the Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya.

The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of MMKtT. 

- Focus Malaysia