First, I would like to state my strong support for the national language, Bahasa Melayu, as the main language of communication in the country.
When non-Malay political leaders such as Loke Siew Fook, Steven Sim, Howard Lee and Gobind Singh are seen to be fluent and comfortable in communicating in BM, it is a good signal for bridge building between the different communities in Malaysia.
I have had the experience of engaging and communicating in BM regularly with my former constituents in Bangi, which was a 51% Malay majority parliamentary seat, which I won by nearly 69,000 votes in the 2018 general election. Since 2022, I have conducted many interviews in BM and have appeared on the popular podcast, Keluar Sekejap, where I discussed many political and policy related issues in BM with the co-hosts, Khairy Jamaluddin and Shahril Hamdan.
Within this context, I would like to clarify my tweets issued yesterday where I wrote:
I am sure Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim didn’t mean to call out the many Malaysians who do not necessarily see themselves as part of the
group who grew up in London but who nonetheless use (at least some) English in their workplace on a regular basis.elite
This would include the many thousands who work for multinational companies in Malaysia and the many public listed companies, especially those which have international customers and operations, academics in public and private universities who teach in English and the support staff who deal with international students, civil servants who have to engage with their foreign counterparts in English, tour guides and taxi drivers who have customers whom they communicate with in English, just to name a few.
By calling out those who speak and use English at the
level, many otherelite
may feel that they are also being unfairly targeted by Anwar’s remarks.non-elites
Those who are using English in different settings in Malaysia may be doing so for other reasons and not because they are undermining the use of BM or that they look down on the use of BM in official settings.
Most annual general meetings of public listed companies are done in English, partly because many of the financial reports are presented in English and because of the presence of foreign shareholders. Many academic proceedings and international conferences are done in English because of the presence of foreign speakers and participants.
This is not to say that there may be some Malaysians who are not so comfortable or fluent in communicating in BM. There are many reasons for this and would require another context to explain fully.
But rather than focusing on the negative, wouldn’t it be better for the prime minister to prose some new and creative examples to demonstrate the importance of the usage of BM?
The many sponsorship deals garnered by the Keluar Sekejap podcast shows that there is a lucrative commercial market in the production of good quality content in Malaysia (mixed with some English).
Rather than presenting a negative narrative, wouldn’t it be much better for the prime minister to highlight positive narratives which can encourage and incentivise others to use BM because it is in their interest to reach the wider BM speaking community, and not because it is being forced on them?
Maybe it’s time for the prime minister’s team at PMO to show him some of these positive examples on social media so that he can present these narratives instead. - FMT
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.