Umno is the bigger brother, but it gives us enough room to voice our thoughts - Hulu Selangor MP P Kamalanathan
COMMENT Some time ago (probably in the 90s) late one night, I was watching Tim Sebastian (BBC HardTalk) going a couple of rounds with some Indian government official about the Indian/Pakistan/Kashmir quagmire.
Something the Indian official said stuck with me. Responding to Sebastian's attempt at pointing out to some compromise coming from Islamabad, the Indian official rather amusingly replied that if someone is pointing a gun at your head and moves it away an inch, it's hardly a compromise.
Reading Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin's attempts at painting the proposed National Harmony Act or any other of the recent amendments or introductions of Acts oozing out of Putrajaya, as so-called "substantial transformative legislation", I can't help but think that anything Umno does as far as Prime Minister Najib Razak's transformative policies are concerned, especially with issues concerning national security, is merely moving the gun an inch.
There was a time when Acts such as the Internal Security Act, Sedition Act, etc, made us whisper amongst ourselves ever fearful that our grievances against the ruling regime would results in midnight visit to our homes by the practitioners of the dark arts. Stories were told of how so and so disappeared one night and loved ones were told to remain silent.
These days the stories are told openly and these Acts although still in selective use have lost their hold over a great many of us. Countless lives which have been irrevocably changed merely because citizens chose to speak truth to power. But this is merely one side of the story.
When we have an Umno MP who wonders if a civil rights activist should (could?) be hanged for treason, we have crossed the Rubicon in terms of defining what is seditious with regards to the political discourse in this country. It goes without saying that any attempt by Umno to curb ‘seditious' speech should be met with scorn.
When asked why no action was taken against the ‘seditious' speech by Umno-backed lackeys such as the propaganda arms of the party or the outsourced thugs, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department and de facto law minister Nazri Abdul Aziz rambled on how the political and social landscapes had "changed".
It was probably the most honest and hypocritical response coming from the minister, which is sadly not as rare a feat as some would believe in the ‘play at your own risk' game of politics.
As I argued in 'Press Gangs of Malaysia', what Malaysia needs is a market place of ideas, something that Najib claims to want (with this new Act) but nothing so far in the sad history of Umno hegemony has demonstrated this.
Selective use of the law
Commenters here and elsewhere have thrown about George Orwell references like it's going out of style indeed, I would like to know which genius in Putrajaya came up with name ‘National Harmony Act', which immediately puts a bull's eyes on it begging for Orwell darts.
The title of the Act reinforces whatever Orwellian cliché is bandied about and the motif behind its creation reeks of the moral bankruptcy of the ruling coalition.
Anyone with a functioning moral compass would be able to recognise that Acts such as this one, the Peaceful Assembly Act and ISA or whatever incarnation is upon us now, are used by the regime to stifle free speech and crack down on political dissent. Its selective use is evidence of an undeclared war on an ideologically diverse population.
However what I would argue is that the selective use of such laws against its own people (refer to our prime minister's so-called Freudian slip with regards to the ISA) has far greater implications in the long run than the mendacious short-term aims of Umno.
What the selective use of Acts such as the ISA (and most probably this new National Harmony Act) have done is poisoned the discourse insofar as how these laws could be of use to the national security of this country.
My own favorite Orwell quote, "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf", rarely gets an airing.
Perhaps because of my past career(s), I have known far too many men (women) who would make suitable guests under whatever "restrictive/unjust" laws that are abhorred by an increasingly frustrated Malaysian public.
I have also known far too many people who have been unjustly subjugated by these laws. Therein lies the rub. A friend who had served loyally in the security apparatus of this country often tells me, that the only time people hear of these "unjust" laws is when the government "misuses them".
If people only knew he said, of the extremely dangerous individuals who meant this country harm, the religious fanatics, the hardcore criminal... Disappointedly, he goes on about how there has never been any real discussion on what we as citizens are prepared to give up in terms of our rights because our rights have been abused from the get go.
Understand now that I'm not making an argument for such laws, but rather pointing to another instance where this regime has made it impossible for Malaysian to have a rational discussion about well, anything.
Something the Indian official said stuck with me. Responding to Sebastian's attempt at pointing out to some compromise coming from Islamabad, the Indian official rather amusingly replied that if someone is pointing a gun at your head and moves it away an inch, it's hardly a compromise.
Reading Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin's attempts at painting the proposed National Harmony Act or any other of the recent amendments or introductions of Acts oozing out of Putrajaya, as so-called "substantial transformative legislation", I can't help but think that anything Umno does as far as Prime Minister Najib Razak's transformative policies are concerned, especially with issues concerning national security, is merely moving the gun an inch.There was a time when Acts such as the Internal Security Act, Sedition Act, etc, made us whisper amongst ourselves ever fearful that our grievances against the ruling regime would results in midnight visit to our homes by the practitioners of the dark arts. Stories were told of how so and so disappeared one night and loved ones were told to remain silent.
These days the stories are told openly and these Acts although still in selective use have lost their hold over a great many of us. Countless lives which have been irrevocably changed merely because citizens chose to speak truth to power. But this is merely one side of the story.
When we have an Umno MP who wonders if a civil rights activist should (could?) be hanged for treason, we have crossed the Rubicon in terms of defining what is seditious with regards to the political discourse in this country. It goes without saying that any attempt by Umno to curb ‘seditious' speech should be met with scorn.
When asked why no action was taken against the ‘seditious' speech by Umno-backed lackeys such as the propaganda arms of the party or the outsourced thugs, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department and de facto law minister Nazri Abdul Aziz rambled on how the political and social landscapes had "changed".
It was probably the most honest and hypocritical response coming from the minister, which is sadly not as rare a feat as some would believe in the ‘play at your own risk' game of politics.
As I argued in 'Press Gangs of Malaysia', what Malaysia needs is a market place of ideas, something that Najib claims to want (with this new Act) but nothing so far in the sad history of Umno hegemony has demonstrated this.
Selective use of the law
Commenters here and elsewhere have thrown about George Orwell references like it's going out of style indeed, I would like to know which genius in Putrajaya came up with name ‘National Harmony Act', which immediately puts a bull's eyes on it begging for Orwell darts.
The title of the Act reinforces whatever Orwellian cliché is bandied about and the motif behind its creation reeks of the moral bankruptcy of the ruling coalition.
Anyone with a functioning moral compass would be able to recognise that Acts such as this one, the Peaceful Assembly Act and ISA or whatever incarnation is upon us now, are used by the regime to stifle free speech and crack down on political dissent. Its selective use is evidence of an undeclared war on an ideologically diverse population.
However what I would argue is that the selective use of such laws against its own people (refer to our prime minister's so-called Freudian slip with regards to the ISA) has far greater implications in the long run than the mendacious short-term aims of Umno.What the selective use of Acts such as the ISA (and most probably this new National Harmony Act) have done is poisoned the discourse insofar as how these laws could be of use to the national security of this country.
My own favorite Orwell quote, "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf", rarely gets an airing.
Perhaps because of my past career(s), I have known far too many men (women) who would make suitable guests under whatever "restrictive/unjust" laws that are abhorred by an increasingly frustrated Malaysian public.
I have also known far too many people who have been unjustly subjugated by these laws. Therein lies the rub. A friend who had served loyally in the security apparatus of this country often tells me, that the only time people hear of these "unjust" laws is when the government "misuses them".
If people only knew he said, of the extremely dangerous individuals who meant this country harm, the religious fanatics, the hardcore criminal... Disappointedly, he goes on about how there has never been any real discussion on what we as citizens are prepared to give up in terms of our rights because our rights have been abused from the get go.
Understand now that I'm not making an argument for such laws, but rather pointing to another instance where this regime has made it impossible for Malaysian to have a rational discussion about well, anything.
Slap on the face
The proposed National Harmony Act is a slap on the face for anyone who believes that speech should be regulated (and this is a perfectly legitimate stance, even though I may not subscribe to it) but yet can only stand by impotently as the Awang Selamats and the Ridhuan Tee Abdullahs of Malaysia are allowed to run riot by Umno.
All these laws and the way how they are implemented is one big fat joke. Take the ISA for instance. When it's not being used to imprison political dissidents (many of whom now make up our ‘opposition politicians'), its uses have been proved a sham by the likes of Yazid Sufaat. Has anyone forgotten how our home minister boasted of how the ISA (presumably) could have rehabilitated Nordin Mat Top?
And yet every country, sooner or later, has to deal with existential threats either from within or without. The problem in Malaysia is that any threat is not viewed as a national threat but as a threat to Umno. Or at least, that's the general perception.
This new National Harmony Act is not about "inculcating the spirit of harmony and mutual respect in the Malaysian society made up of various races and religions" but rather about not unbalancing the harmony in Umno.
These are chaotic times for Umno. Nobody knows what's going to happen. Umno seems to be in a state of flux with the supreme council involved in protracted power games that are leaving the rank and file milling about like lost sheep. The prime minister says one thing and his minions do another.
I believe most people are mistaken when they think Umno is trying to repackage these old laws as some sort of publicity stunt to garner goodwill. I think there is something more to it. I'm in the camp that believes that Umno has finally decided to "go alone at it" and laws such as these are merely being created to stockpile their armoury.
Everyone is waiting with bated breath for Najib to pull the trigger on the election gun. The belief is that the results of the election will be the dawn of a new day. I sincerely wish this is so.
But just the other night before I read about the proposed National Harmony Act, I was rereading Alan Moore's (Dave Lloyd's) ‘V for Vendetta', and this jumped up at me: With so much chaos, someone will do something stupid. And when they do, things will turn nasty."
The proposed National Harmony Act is a slap on the face for anyone who believes that speech should be regulated (and this is a perfectly legitimate stance, even though I may not subscribe to it) but yet can only stand by impotently as the Awang Selamats and the Ridhuan Tee Abdullahs of Malaysia are allowed to run riot by Umno.
All these laws and the way how they are implemented is one big fat joke. Take the ISA for instance. When it's not being used to imprison political dissidents (many of whom now make up our ‘opposition politicians'), its uses have been proved a sham by the likes of Yazid Sufaat. Has anyone forgotten how our home minister boasted of how the ISA (presumably) could have rehabilitated Nordin Mat Top?
And yet every country, sooner or later, has to deal with existential threats either from within or without. The problem in Malaysia is that any threat is not viewed as a national threat but as a threat to Umno. Or at least, that's the general perception.This new National Harmony Act is not about "inculcating the spirit of harmony and mutual respect in the Malaysian society made up of various races and religions" but rather about not unbalancing the harmony in Umno.
These are chaotic times for Umno. Nobody knows what's going to happen. Umno seems to be in a state of flux with the supreme council involved in protracted power games that are leaving the rank and file milling about like lost sheep. The prime minister says one thing and his minions do another.
I believe most people are mistaken when they think Umno is trying to repackage these old laws as some sort of publicity stunt to garner goodwill. I think there is something more to it. I'm in the camp that believes that Umno has finally decided to "go alone at it" and laws such as these are merely being created to stockpile their armoury.
Everyone is waiting with bated breath for Najib to pull the trigger on the election gun. The belief is that the results of the election will be the dawn of a new day. I sincerely wish this is so.
But just the other night before I read about the proposed National Harmony Act, I was rereading Alan Moore's (Dave Lloyd's) ‘V for Vendetta', and this jumped up at me: With so much chaos, someone will do something stupid. And when they do, things will turn nasty."
S THAYAPARAN is Commander (rtd) of the Royal Malaysian Navy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.