A three-member panel comprising Justices Datuk Ramly Ali, Datuk Zaharah Ibrahim and Anantham Kasinather ordered Ong to pay RM5,000 in legal costs.
Justice Ramly said the issues in the case involved questions of facts, which must be decided at a trial.
He ordered the case be tried before another High Court judge, saying that the current High Court judge had made some findings of facts in the case during the striking out application.
Ong was appealing against the August 10, 2011 Kuala Lumpur High Court’s decision to disallow the application brought by him, former Port Klang Authority (PKA) chairman Datuk Lee Hwa Beng and PKA to strike out the misfeasance in public office suit filed against them by KDSB.
Lee and PKA did not file the appeal.
On August 20, 2009, KDSB sued Ong, Lee and PKA for misfeasance in public office, claiming that they had disclosed the report on Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal prepared by Pricewaterhouse Coopers Advisory Services Sdn Bhd (PwCAS) to the public, with ill-intention of causing the company to suffer losses.
The report was disclosed to the public through a media conference on May 28, 2009, which was held under Ong’s instruction and attended by Lee and PwCAS senior partners.
KDSB claimed that the disclosure of the report had tarnished its reputation and that it was criticised by the public without having the opportunity to offer clarification or defend itself.
Hence, KDSB is seeking general and exemplary damages as well as costs and interests.
Ong was represented by lawyer Sarah Ambishegam while N. Navaratnam and Ng Jack Yee represented KDSB. — Bernama
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.