So the guy in Sabah with those millions of Ringgit stashed in his office furniture will be charged with 13 counts of "money laundering". Not corruption.
They need not prove who gave him the money or why they gave him the money.
All they need to prove was that it was ill gotten money that was being "laundered".
This means that they need not investigate this case further than money laundering.
If the charge was "corruption" then the investigation and also the trial must cover in more depth about the what, where, when and the who, why and how of the money.
But "money laundering" need not go into so much details of that sort.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.