`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


Sunday, December 25, 2011

SABAH 'TENDER GATE' ministry (SECOND SERIES)


By: INFO88 Comunity
SAFE Welcomes Christmas Day celebration. I would like to congratulate and thank you for the answers given by the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development (MRRD), which I was sure if it is not KSU, Corporate Communications Unit will reply to the article "Tenders Gate 'ministry (First Series).
When this article was written, I get the information for the investigation of the MACC this case. I believe this article will be able to help another full inquiry be made with any questions that I will show later.
I would like to thank colleagues also Sabahkini.net other bloggers willing to publish this article which seems very 'hot' and look forward to 'Tender Gate II Series.
Actually there are many that I can show the case of rural road projects, Rural Electricity Supply, Rural Water Supply and others in this ministry. I just let my bullets one by one only.
We return to the 'Tender Gate ministry "(Series II). Before that, I would like to highlight the ministry of the answer has to do with the second series. From the answers given by the ministry on ' ministry denies misguided in 'Tender Gate', then it is clear that abuses by the Minister of MRRD moved by Deputy Secretary General (SE) and its officers (Dr Najmil and Karim). I will raise later.
Meor Hafizan Bin Abdul Ghani who is the Head of Corporate Communications explained that the ministry in the answer;
Proceeds BOARD A (LPA) KKLW No. 5, Year 2011 which was convened on February 24, 2011 has agreed to grant the application listing the name of the contractor to participate in the tender offer Kg Limited Access Road Project. Menawo, Keningau, Sabah area under the department's budget by JKR Sabah amounted to RM 9.4 million.
However at the time of the tender process of implementing PWD, PWD budget has increased to RM 11,584 million. Consequently, the WTP ministry only recommends to the Finance Ministry as the department has exceeded the power budget of the Ministry.
It clearly bersuluh! Ministry of Finance Malaysia clearly says "inform the ministry that the implementation of a limited tender for the project on irregular for not complying with the rules set out in Treasury Circular (SPP) and SPP-2009 Bil.9 Bil.2002" - "NOT correct order 'because of the abuse of power in this tender.
I challenge the ministry must make public the names of 10 of the Company under the Companies pact Juz Jati Sdn Bhd, which is offered for a limited tender Kg Menawo Access Road Project, Keningau Sabah.
The initial report with the project consultants to estimate the cost of PWD Sabah RM 9.4 million with PWD report must be disclosed and then compared with the PWD tender 10 companies participating in this tender.
Sure you will be surprised because it puts the price of 10 companies 'are not much different' and WTP ministry convened February 24, 2011 the Company decided Juz Jati Sdn Bhd for tender.
The question is, if all companies are aware of this tender 10 Class B why all these companies put a price more than RM 10 million as if they know that this is the actual cost.
Why? Because 10 of these companies are headed by the Company Juz Jati Sdn Bhd and behind a big tycoons in Sabah. Shall I disclose my ministry 'taikon' this large has now acquired ministry projects (from roads and water supply) reached more than RM1 billion dollars from the lowest class to the class A?
Does this not clearly prove the WTP ministry is very exposed to the direction of the Minister of the Ministry and its officials to the Company Juz Jati Sdn Bhd or class B tender is approved.
How old-fashioned and stupid this ministry officials from its development division (also a branch in Sabah) to a department that manages the JKR Sabah project failed to get a scope of work and tender prior to its implementation more than the original set.
Why not be limited only by tendering Class A? Did the previous Ministry of Finance Malaysia via a letter of reference S / K.KEW / PK / KI 1/1700/8/0209/156/12-43 vol 11 SK 7 (6) dated August 18, 2010 has approved 16 projects in advance NKRA ( from the 57 who applied for a pass 16-may now have changed)?
The question is why passed directly in earnings BOARD A (LPA) KKLW No. 5 Year 2011 together with the appointment of a contractor if the ministry had to know was more than the Ministry.
Did the Board (Secretary General / Deputy Secretary General) should cancel the tender only in the meeting and requested the secretariat to make the tender of tender in the prescribed classes.
What actually do ministry? Why should the MOH to make decisions for ministry? It is like an experiment to the Ministry of Finance Malaysia where they can be approved in two ways, namely;
Regular application seeking approval to the Ministry of Finance Malaysia, as directed by the Treasury Circular (SPP) and SPP-2009 Bil.9 Bil.2002. Limit the power of more than RM 10 million which requires the approval of the MOH. (As the letter of approval in Attachment approved 16 projects NKRA) or,
How to present to approve the Acquisition BOARD A (LPA) ministry for the first class B then applied for special approval of the cost of the certificate of appointment of contractors. What this second manner if approved by the Finance Ministry to appoint first means to facilitate ministry in ministry and create a certificate back to the Finance Ministry? Smart is ...
Why the ministry did not like the way first? Maybe because if the first method (i) the ministry will have to follow MOH direction if any ministry projects exceeding RM 10 million even ministry recommends the appointment of contractors in WTP, but the MOH still has the power to recommend 10 qualified companies.(Not necessarily agree with the ministry if terms of price and technical incorrectly).
But as a whole generally agreed with the recommendation of MOH MOH. Ask the Dato 'Yussof Dohab he would have known how to command the Minister of the Ministry and its officials like Dr. Faiz Najmil and Dato' Karim influencing WTP Chairman ministry.
The remains bad. Ministry of Finance Malaysia will not be in cahoots with the things that can get wrapped around their necks. So the official response;
"Therefore, there is no issue that the Minister MRRD has deviated and directed the Class B limited tenders approved in the project and no disciplinary violations committed by the officers involved in the implementation of a limited tender for this project."
What about the second letter I listed in this article on Kangkau Road Project (Skip)-Narambai, Ranau, Sabah reference S / K.KEW / PK / KI 1/700/810209/156/22 SK vol 15 4 (4) ?
Apparently this second offense and probably many more letters like this? Kenilworth Road Project at the real one, thus the second project is a PKK Class B increased cost up to RM16, 035,890.00 and appoint contractors Millionaire Gold Co., Ltd..
Is this not wrong? STUPID else WTP Chairman ministry, its committees and the secretariat tender? Why are all trained PTD is still dumb silent so they do not give proper advice to the minister when this one? Or is Dato 'Yussof Dohab (Chairman tender) and his officers have an interest in this project?
It appears that the Commission will work again for additional reports. It seems that officials of the Ministry and Procurement Development ministry, but JKR Sabah as the executor of the tender will be busy answering this issue.
Ask the Officer Dato 'Yussof Dohab MRRD Deputy Secretary General, Karim (SUSK), Dr. Faiz Najmil (SUS), Izhar (PTTK), they are certainly very aware that copies of minutes of instruction MRRD Minister for Rural Roads Project (JALB), Supply Project Rural Electrification (BELB), Rural Water Supply Project (BALB) would have on them.
Minutes of the Deputy Secretary General "Please take action", "Please Give priority" is what many are processed by the officer. Shall I reveal all of this minute? (Perhaps the next episode).
Do not believe, try to compare the minutes of the Minister to the Deputy Secretary General and refer back all the ministry LPA meeting chaired by Dato 'Yussof Dohab. 90% would approach the Minister of MRRD.Teluskah really?
You behold is Karim (SUSK), Dr. Faiz Najmil (SUS) the minister and his officials; how rich their big house, cars Audi Q7 or Porsche Cayenne. How much is their salary up to a wealth in a short time?
Ministry is supposed to strive for 100% of this NKRA's Ministry crazy. Look at only the tender Rural Electricity Supply Project (BELB) and the Rural Water Supply Project (BALB).
All tender made by the consultant. Consultants who are against the officer? The reason the officer is not enough to make an assessment of the tender. Is not this will lead to information leakage when the consultants found friends cronies arrange for short-listed?
If the initial assessment of the voids, the voids would end. In fact, the cost is elevated beyond the original estimate. See for hybrid solar power tender on the island of Sulawesi Banggi jumped up to 80 million and above. In case there is an experienced company that can build in the cost of RM40 million or RM50 million or more cheaper. Who can?
Next episode we will see how many tender Rural Electricity Supply Project (BELB), Rural Water Supply Project (BALB) and JALB keluargakan owned by the Minister of MRRD as sister, brother (Hj. Yusof Haji Hamid, Hj Zul), falling , his son, his nephew and friends get tender hundreds of millions of dollars. It was not yet in all the proxy.
More surprising MRRD Minister also gave the project to the proxy arch-rival Datuk Seri Musa Aman Khan when families own the Rural Water Supply Project.
Minister of the Ministry and the officials let the issue cautiously replied that I have written. I just wait and see. I'm watching you. If you report to the police about this story, so I figured it was good because you will accelerate two cases;
Investigation of specified projects and two further popularize this sabahkini.net website to the world.
Do not let me attach in this article of the letter / memo delegation of powers to the Secretary-General MRRD Minister / Deputy Secretary General 'Government Contracts Act 1949' on the certificate of appointment Letter of Acceptance and the contractor signed by the Minister of MRRD. Of course many people want to know who ordered to give?
Hopefully, be patient and wait for the next exposure. - Sabahkini (translated from Malay - errors & mistakes apologise)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.