said Kenny Chua, deputy president of Parti Solidariti Tanahairku (STAR), the Borneo Post reported.I think Sabah and Sarawak should actively discuss a Plan B. If our demand is not met, we must already know what’s our next step,
The
must be aligned with the aspirations of East Malaysians, he said. Sabah and Sarawak leaders cannot assume that the federal government will in future hand them one-third of the decision-making power in the Dewan Rakyat.next step
Chua said that East Malaysians, as a minority in Parliament, must seriously take heed of the possibility of MA63 being revoked.
We can either wait until god knows when our demands will be met or we can start exploring ways how we can be a few steps ahead,
he was quoted as saying.
When Malaysia was formed in 1963, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore were allocated a total of 55 seats (or 34.5%) in the 159-member Dewan Rakyat. Singapore’s provision of 15 seats was eliminated in 1965 when the republic left Malaysia, leaving the Borneo states with a 27% share of the 144-seat house.
In 1973, when the Dewan Rakyat was expanded to 154 members, the extra seats were allocated to West Malaysian states and the federal territory while Sabah and Sarawak retained their 16 and 24 seats respectively (or 25.9%).
The current Dewan Rakyat comprises 222 members, with Sabah allocated 25 seats and Sarawak 31, for a combined 25.2% share.
The activists said the two states would then have veto power to block any unilateral constitutional amendments by Peninsular Malaysia leaders. However, 11 organisations rejected the proposal earlier today, describing it as
disingenuous
and
an insult to East Malaysians
- FMT
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.