`



Tuesday, July 29, 2014

HATI-HATI ! JANGAN TERBELI AYAM YANG DITEBUK DI TESCO


Assalamualaikum,

Masa hari raya pertama korang cek dulu tak ayam yang korang beli di pasaraya sama ada disembelih secara betul atau tak..Sebab ada famili ni beli ayam di Tesco terkena ayam yang disembelih dengan cara yang tidak mengikut hukum syarak (cara tebuk) .

Kalau dah termakan nak buat macam mana kan..tapi lepas ni harap kita semua lebih peka dan berhati-hati dengan masalah sebegini untuk mengelakkan unsur-unsur haram masuk ke dalam darah daging kita..


Aussies place gag order on bank-note graft case involving Malaysia, says WikiLeaks

Employees from the Reserve Bank of Australia’s subsidiary companies – Securency and Note Printing Australia – were alleged to have bribed foreign officials in Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam from 1999 to 2004 to win banknote printing contracts. – The Malaysian Insider file pic, July 30, 2014.Employees from the Reserve Bank of Australia’s subsidiary companies – Securency and Note Printing Australia – were alleged to have bribed foreign officials in Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam from 1999 to 2004 to win banknote printing contracts. – The Malaysian Insider file pic, July 30, 2014.
Australia has placed a gag order on a multi-million dollar graft case involving the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam through an unprecedented court order, reported whistleblower WikiLeaks today.
The case named past and present leaders from Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam, their relatives and other senior officials.
The scandal involved the RBA's subsidiaries – Securency and Note Printing Australia.
"This is an unprecedented act of censorship by Australian authorities concerning such a high-profile and multi-million dollar case," said the anti-secrecy group's publisher, Julian Assange.
"Grounds of national security have been invoked by Australian authorities to prevent any reporting on this case to protect the country's international relations."
The Age newspaper in a report this morning said no Australian media organisation can legally publish the the document or its contents.
The paper reported what Assange had said but provided no further details.
Assange said the court order had been issued following the secret indictment of seven senior executives from the two subsidiaries.
WikiLeaks revealed that 17 high-profile individuals on the suppression list included past and present prime ministers of Malaysia.
Also on the list are Vietnamase President Truong Tan San, Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and former Indonesian president Megawati Sukarnoputri.
"The super injunction specifically bans the publication of the order itself, which effectively blacks out the largest high-level corruption case in Australia and the region," Assange said.
He said the last-known blanket suppression order had been granted in 1995.
That case involved a joint American-Australian spying operation against the Chinese embassy in Canberra.
Assange said the super injunction order concerning the banknote scandal was the worst in living memory.
"With this order, the Australian government is not just gagging the Australian press, it is blindfolding the Australian public,” he was quoted as saying.
"This is not simply a question of the Australian government failing to give this international corruption case the public scrutiny it is due.
"Foreign Minister Julie Bishop must explain why she is threatening every Australian with imprisonment in an attempt to cover up an embarrassing corruption scandal involving the Australian government."
The bribery allegations first surfaced in 2009, which prompted the Australian Federal Police and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to begin separate probes.
In 2010, the MACC detained three individuals linked to the supply of RM5 polymer notes following a report that Securency had offered bribes to Malaysian officials.
All three, including a businessman, were charged with accepting RM11.3 million to secure the contract from Bank Negara Malaysia and to ensure that the government opted for the polymer notes.
Former prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had in 2011 denied allegations that the two Australian firms attempted to bribe him for a RM100 million currency contract during his tenure.
The attempt is believed to be related to the deal to supply RM5 polymer notes that began circulating in 2004.
- TMI

DAP: Zuhdi must apologise for 'racist' remarks


DAP today demanded that PAS central committee member Mohd Zuhdi Marzuki apologise for "racist and extremist" remarks made in leaked chat messages.

DAP's national publicity secretary Tony Pua (right) said while it was the prerogative of the Islamic party to analyse if it should or should not remain in the opposition bloc, it was the second part of Zuhdi’s "analysis" that has irked many Malaysians.

"Where Zuhdi wants to remain in Pakatan or not is not disputed. That is his right as a PAS member (to make that consideration)," Pua said in a statement.

Pua was referring to Zuhdi's remarks about "swatting away" complaints by DAP and non-Muslims if PAS teams up with Umno.

In his messages, which was part of a conversation in a PAS central committee mobile messaging service, Whatsapp, chat group, also dismissed the 'Allah' issue and appeared to endorse church raids.

Zuhdi has offered nothing more than a simple explanation that he was "representing other people's opinions" when he wrote the second part of the message.

"His analysis clearly shows that he has racist and extremist thoughts where the rights of Malaysians who are non-Malay and non-Muslim can be trampled on," Pua said.

'Action against narrow-minded leaders'

In his sternly worded press statement, Pua, who also heads Selangor's DAP division, asked Dr Mohd Zuhdi to leave Pakatan.

"If his racist and extremist ways are not regretted, then we do not wish to see Dr Mohd Zuhdi remain in Pakatan, even if he has no intentions to exit.

"At the same time,we hope that PAS take action against other narrow-minded leaders like him so that the good name of PAS and its slogan 'PAS for all' is not marred," the MP for Petaling Jaya Utara said.

Pua noted that even in Zuhdi's follow-up Facebook comments acknowledging the exposed Whatsapp messages, Mohd Zuhdi did not make amends for his bigoted remarks.

"Therefore, his name is still not cleared of very negative perceptions from many quarters," Pua added.

In the leaked message, Mohd Zuhdi, a lecturer, had a discussion with other PAS central commitee leaders. They outlined a strategy of even co-operating with rival Umno to keep Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim (left) in power.

This is to counter a PKR recent bid to replace him with the party's president Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.

The part that Pua found offensive was when the discussion talked about a plan to restore the dominance of the Malays in the country's political landscape so that they could negate "DAP and non-Muslims".

This appeared to directly contradict Pakatan fight for a multi-racial, multi-religious Malaysia.

Zuhdi is also the operations director of the PAS research centre (PPP).

THE RM50 MILLION OFFER WHICH OUTRAGED KHALID

mt2014-corridors-of-power
The real reason why the Kajang Move was mooted in 2013 and then launched in January 2014 is because a certain businessman offered Anwar and the party RM50 million as an inducement for them to influence the Menteri Besar’s decision regarding a certain business deal and this outraged Khalid who refused to play ball. Hence they accused Khalid of not being a ‘team player’.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
In January 2014, the State Assemblyman for Kajang, Lee Chin Cheh, resigned. This was so that Anwar Ibrahim could contest that seat in a by-election and thereafter become a Selangor State Assemblyman.
But why does Anwar need to be a Selangor State Assemblyman? Well, according to PKR’s political strategist, Rafizi Ramli, as he said in an official statement in January this year, this is the reason why:
While Khalid Ibrahim’s administration has shown sterling performance over the last 6 years that endears him to the public, there are rooms for improvement in many areas especially given the latest dynamics in Umno.
It is an open secret that the move to remove Najib Razak has begun. As a party strategist, I cannot rule out the possibility that Najib is removed and Umno falls to the ultras led by Mahathir Mohamad’s faction.
The unscrupulous attack and schemes to take Selangor by hook or by crook will begin the moment the weak Najib is removed. Even as we speak, Umno’s cards are all too obvious in the latest round of racial and religious controversies stirred up in Selangor in the last few months.
Should Najib fall, expect a full-blown manipulation of racial and religious issues to create mistrust and frustration with the Selangor government.
That was what Rafizi said. Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is in danger of being ousted (toppled by Dr Mahathir) and when he falls Umno will then successfully take back Selangor unless Anwar is made a Selangor State Assemblyman.
But how can Anwar stop this from happening? Will Anwar be taking over as Menteri Besar?
At that time the answer they gave us was ‘no’ (but now Anwar says that this was the plan all along). They have not come to that stage where the position of the Selangor Menteri Besar needs to be discussed or considered. The plan is only to make Anwar a State Assemblyman.
But why the sudden move? This appears like a knee-jerk reaction?
It is not a sudden move, said Rafizi. This was being quietly planned behind the scenes for a few months since the second half of 2013 (that means around three or four months after the general election). In fact, negotiations with the Kajang State Assemblyman, Lee Chin Cheh, took a bit of time before an agreement was reached.
According to Lee, he said he would only resign if Anwar were going to be the one to contest that seat. And he agreed to resign only after he managed to meet Anwar to discuss this matter and get Anwar’s assurance that he (Anwar) was going to be the candidate.
This all happened in 2013 and then, in January 2014, a few months later, Lee resigned and the announcement for the ‘Kajang Move’ was made.
It was during that same period, the fourth quarter of 2013, when the Selangor State Government made its official and final offer to the water concessionaires, in November 2013 to be exact, meaning around the same time that the Kajang Move was being mooted.
It is probably purely ‘coincidental’ that the Kajang Move and the offer to the water concessionaires both happened around the same time.
Many PKR leaders, Anwar and Rafizi included, said that the Kajang Move, planned in 2013, is crucial because of the water concession issue, the Bible issue, the Kidex issue, and so on (plus because Khalid Ibrahim is not a ‘team player’).
Okay, in 2013, at the time the Kajang Move was being planned, the state had only made an offer to take over the water concessionaires. It was still being negotiated and nothing had been settled yet at the time the Kajang Move was being mooted.
Then, in January 2014, the Kajang Move was launched. But it was not until the following month, in February 2014, when the MoU on the water concessions was signed.
In other words, even if you want to consider the MoU on the water concessions as an issue to justify the Kajang Move, it did not become an issue until one month AFTER the launching of the Kajang Move. When the Kajang Move was being planned in 2013, and when it was launched in January 2014, there was no such thing as a ‘problem’ with the water concessions.
So how can one of the reasons for the Kajang Move be the water concessions when no such ‘problem’ existed yet, that is in the first place if you want to even regard it as a problem?
The next justification for the Kajang Move and another reason why Khalid needs to be ousted is because of the Bible controversy.
But the Bibles were seized in January 2014, after the Kajang Move was mooted in 2013, and it did not really become a problem until June 2014, five months later, when the Attorney-General ruled that the confiscation of the Bibles was wrong.
The so-called problem here is not regarding the confiscation of the Bibles in January because it was done according to Selangor State law. It became a ‘problem’ in June when the AG ruled that the confiscation was wrong and the state still refused to return the Bibles.
So, at the time the Kajang Move was mooted in 2013 there was no Bible controversy yet and when it was launched in January 2014 there was no legal ruling by the AG yet. So how could the Bible controversy be an issue in 2013 when the ‘issue’ did not exist yet at that time?
The Kidex issue is also being mentioned as another reason why the Kajang Move was mooted in 2013. But Kidex did not become controversial until May 2014, long after the Kajang move was mooted in 2013 and launched in January 2014.
So, what is the real reason why the Kajang Move was planned in 2013 and launched in January 2014?
The real reason why the Kajang Move was mooted in 2013 and then launched in January 2014 is because a certain businessman offered Anwar and the party RM50 million as an inducement for them to influence the Menteri Besar’s decision regarding a certain business deal and this outraged Khalid who refused to play ball. Hence they accused Khalid of not being a ‘team player’.
Anyway, what is happening in Selangor is déjà vu of what happened in Perak six year ago. In 2008, Pakatan Rakyat took over Perak and appointed a Menteri Besar from PAS, Nizar Jamaluddin. Anwar then tried to interfere in how Nizar ran the state. When Nizar told Anwar to go screw himself Anwar launched a similar ‘Kajang Move’ in Perak.
Anwar enticed Umno State Assemblyman Nasaruddin Hashim to cross over to the opposition with the promise that he would replace Nizar as the new Perak Menteri Besar. Nasaruddin crossed over but a short while later crossed back to Umno together with two PKR and one DAP State Assemblypersons.
That saw the downfall of Pakatan Rakyat in Perak. Is this going to be repeated in Selangor?

New! ‘Last Photo’ of MH17 Exposes Reuters! Confirms Passengers Boarded Another Flight!

… report by DAHBOO7, published on July 28, 2014

Noted II: 
* Child-killing sociopaths of Israel - [When will a 'War On Terror' be launched against Israel?!]
* NEW MH17 SENSATION: German experts point finger at Ukrainian air-force jets

Busted! The cabal’s “By way of deception thou shalt do war” exposed yet again! Do you still believe everything the mainstream media reports?

Source: DAHBOO7  http://www.undergroundworldnews.com

The evidence is now even stronger! We have a 2nd photo that shows that the plane boarded was MRC, Not MRD!
The flight MRC should have NEVER been there to begin with, according to flight logs!
It also exposes the fact that Reuters had an agent on the ground snapping the ‘Last Shots’ of MH17!

Here’s the “Three Plane Ghosts” video (published on July 27) referred to above …


A Short take on Selangor MB and Leaked Whatsapp scenario analysis that isnt analytical



Just a short take. Lets not spoil our Hari Raya.Mahu Raya pun tak sinang.

The 2 hot issues now I think are (1) the leaked conversation between PAS members in their whatsapp group. In particular the scenario analysis of Dr Zuhdi Marzuki about the position of PAS and (2) the ignorance of Khalid Ibrahim about the unspoken rules of politics.

Much as I respect and revere Tok Guru Nik Aziz, he has been proven wrong on several occasions when judging personalities. He may be a pious man but it’s not possible for any human to have complete qashaf or knowledge beyond the physical.

I remember a long time ago, he was supportive of Abu Hassan Omar a onetime MB of Selangor. He gave such a resounding endorsement to Abu Hassan that the later expressed syukur to Nik Aziz. Abu Hassan turned out to be a dud despite Nik Aziz’s endorsement. So if I were Khalid Ibrahim, I would not be counting my chickens too soon.

I have not written about this- because the official stand of DAP is to allow these parties directly involved in these issues to sort them out. In the case of the scenario analysis, PAS should make its stand clear on this. In the case of the Selangor MB- PKR and Khalid Ibrahim.So readers please take note: this is a personal opinion of mine.

Khalid Ibrahim must stop believing that his position as MB is the same as being the CEO of Guthrie. He is MB because his party together with the endorsement of the other PR parties agreed on his position. We do not have direct elections in choosing the MB. Khalid as an economics teacher (he taught is Sekolah Menengah Abdul Rahman Talib in Kuantan) cannot comprehend this? Instead he makes a big fuss about PAS supporting his position as MB. Where is his honour in this instance?

You don’t have support from your own party; you have to depend on the support of another? Then he should quit PKR and join PAS. Or PAS can insist on wanting their man to become MB. They can, as suggested by Dr Zuhdi team up with UMNO and retain Khalid Ibrahim, whom the future of Selangor depeded.

They must do so, because Khalid Ibrahim is the only man that can develop Selangor. PAS has only kampung ustazs and lay preachers who are more interested in other worldly pursuits and using Islam and a control tool. That will satisfy the power crazy and position starved PAS members who want to have positions in government.

Posted by sakmongkol AK47

ZAID IBRAHIM BERKATA UMAT ISLAM MUNDUR SEBAB HARAMKAN LELAKI DAN PEREMPUAN BERSALAMAN ... BETUL KE???

Heboh kini satu tweet dari akaun kepunyaan Zaid Ibrahim berbunyi .. Bersalam lelaki perempuan haram. Patut lah umat Islam mundur .

Betul ke apa yang dinyatakan ini? .. Adakah ini akaun twitter sebenar Zaid Ibrahim? Jika benar maka penjelasan terperinci harus diberikan mengapa boleh beliau berkata sedemikian .. Jika bukan maka perlu beliau buat laporan polis kerana ada pihak lain berniat jahat mau menjatuhkan nama baiknya dengan serangan fitnah jahat ini kerana tweet ini sudah pun mulai tersebar dialam maya.


Menyentuh wanita bukan mahram; bersalam, tepuk bahu, jentik telinga, apatah lagi memegang, memeluk dan sebagainya, ia merupakan perbuatan yang haram. Tidak kira kita bersalam dengan pemimpin atau orang bawahan, rakyat bersalam dengan pemimpin, pemimpin bersalam dengan rakyat. 


Perkara ini perlu difahami, ia datang dari syariat. Ia adalah perkara agama. Ia bukan perkara di mana jika masuk parti A boleh salam, masuk parti B tidak boleh salam. Ia bukan sekejap boleh dan sekejap tidak boleh. Ini adalah perkara agama dan ia mesti dipraktikkan pada setiap masa dan keadaan.


Ini bukan jumud dan ini bukan ekstrim, tetapi ini adalah prinsip Islam.

Pertama, kerana dalilnya jelas. 


Dalam hadis Aisyah RA, diriwayatkan oleh Imam Al-Bukhari dan Muslim,


قَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ فَمَنْ أَقَرَّ بِهَذَا مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ فَقَدْ أَقَرَّ بِالْمِحْنَةِ وَكَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- إِذَا أَقْرَرْنَ بِذَلِكَ مِنْ قَوْلِهِنَّ قَالَ لَهُنَّ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- « انْطَلِقْنَ فَقَدْ بَايَعْتُكُنَّ ». وَلاَ وَاللَّهِ مَا مَسَّتْ يَدُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- يَدَ امْرَأَةٍ قَطُّ. غَيْرَ أَنَّهُ يُبَايِعُهُنَّ بِالْكَلاَمِ – قَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ – وَاللَّهِ مَا أَخَذَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- عَلَى النِّسَاءِ قَطُّ إِلاَّ بِمَا أَمَرَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى وَمَا مَسَّتْ كَفُّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- كَفَّ امْرَأَةٍ قَطُّ وَكَانَ يَقُولُ لَهُنَّ إِذَا أَخَذَ عَلَيْهِنَّ « قَدْ بَايَعْتُكُنَّ ». كَلاَمًا.
“Aisyah berkata, “Siapa saja wanita mukminah yang mengikrarkan hal ini, maka ia telah diuji.” Rasulullah SAW sendiri berkata ketika para wanita mukminah mengikrarkan yang demikian, “Kalian boleh pergi kerana aku sudah membai’at kalian”. Namun demi Allah, beliau sama sekali tidak pernah menyentuh tangan seorang wanita pun. Beliau hanya membaiat para wanita dengan ucapan beliau. ‘Aisyah berkata, “Rasulullah SAW tidaklah pernah menyentuh wanita sama sekali sebagaimana yang Allah perintahkan. Tangan beliau tidaklah pernah menyentuh tangan mereka.  Ketika baiat, beliau hanya membaiat dengan berkata, “Aku telah membaiat kalian dengan perkataan.”
Bahkan dalam hadis yang diriwayatkan oleh Imam Malik bin Anas RA dengan sanad yang sahih, sabda Nabi SAW,

إِنِّي لاَ أُصَافِحُ النِّسَاءَ، إِنَّمَا قَوْلِي لـِمِائَةِ امْرَأَةٍ كَقَوْلِي لِامْرَأَةٍ وَاحِدَةٍ
“Sesungguhnya aku tidak sama sekali berjabat tangan dengan kaum wanita. Hanyalah ucapanku kepada seratus wanita seperti ucapanku kepada seorang wanita.” (riwayat Mali, An-Nasa-i dalam ‘Isyratun Nisa` dari As-Sunan Al-Kubra, At-Tirmidzi, dll. Lihat Ash-Shahihah no. 529)
Begitu juga kata Nabi SAW,

لأَنْ يُطْعَنَ فِي رَأْسِ رَجُلٍ بِمِخْيَطٍ مِنْ حَدِيدٍ خَيْرٌ لَهُ مِنْ أَنْ يَمَسَّ امْرَأَةً لا تَحِلُّ لَهُ
“Ditusuknya kepala seseorang dengan pasak dari besi, sungguh lebih baik baginya daripada menyentuh wanita yang bukan mahramnya.”(riwayat Thabrani dalam Mu’jam Al Kabir 20: 211. Syaikh Al Albani mengatakan bahwa hadis ini shahih)
Pada hari ini ramai di kalangan umat Islam mengambil mudah hal ini. Itu tiga hadis yang saya bawakan dan banyak lagi hadis-hadis yang lain dan saya tidak bermaksud untuk menceritakan kesemuanya.

Kedua, perempuan itu aurat.


Di dalam hadis Nabi SAW memerintahkan kita menundukkan mata dan pandangan. Kalau mata pun dilarang melihat, apatah lagi memegang. Dalam hadis yang masyhur, Jarir bin ‘Abdillah mengatakan,


سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- عَنْ نَظَرِ الْفُجَاءَةِ فَأَمَرَنِى أَنْ أَصْرِفَ بَصَرِى
“Aku bertanya kepada Rasulullah shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam tentang pandangan yang cuma selintas (tidak sengaja). Maka Rasulullah shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam memerintahkan kepadaku agar aku segera memalingkan pandanganku.” (riwayat Muslim no. 2159)
Itu adalah asal hukumnya, jika melihat pun dilarang oleh Nabi, apatah lagi memegang.

Ketiga, tutup pintu dan jalan yang boleh membawa kepada kerosakan.


Ada di kalangan kita yang memberi alasan, aku bersalam dengan orang yang sudah tua, aku tidak ada apa-apa perasaan terhadapnya. Itu perasaan kita. Bagaimana dengan perasaan pihak yang satu lagi. Kita tidak boleh menganggap orang lain perasaannya sama dengan perasaan kita.


Pernah dengar atau tidak kes rogol nenek yang berusia lebih 70 tahun? Berlaku atau tidak? Perkara ini berlaku. Jadi Islam menyuruh umatnya menutup jalan-jalan dan ruang-ruang yang boleh membawa kepada kerosakan, dengan itu tidak boleh bersalaman antara lelaki dan perempuan bukan mahram, tidak kira sepupu, atau tinggal bersama sejak kecil seperti adik beradik, adik ipar atau sebagainya. Hukum tidak ditetapkan seperti itu.


Malah sepupu dan adik ipar sebenarnya lebih bahaya. Kata Nabi SAW,


الْحَمْوُ الْمَوْتُ
 “Al-Hamwu adalah maut.” (riwayat al-Bukhari)
Al-Hafizh Ibnu Hajar al-Asqalani rhm dalam Fathul Bari menukilkan ucapan al-Imam an-Nawawi rhm berkata bahawa ahli bahasa sepakat bahwa al-hamwu adalah kerabat-kerabat suami, seperti ayah, pakcik, saudara lelaki, ipar, sepupu dan semisalnya.

Sebab apa demikian adalah apabila berlaku sesuatu isu contohnya adik ipar berkenan dengan abang ipar, bukan sahaja dari sudut hukum ianya jadi haram, bahkan dari sudut hubungan kekeluargaan akan rosak. Apa kata adik kepada abangnya jika hal sedemikian terjadi? Ia akan jadi isu besar dan memecah belahkan hubungan kekeluargaan.


Sebab itu Islam mengambil langkah berhati-hati dengan mengingatkan bahaya ipar sebagai maut, kerana mata dan perasaan manusia sangat bahaya. Kalau selalu melihat dan memandang, yang tidak elok akan kelihatan cantik, dan sebagainya.


Itu perkara dan hujah asas yang dibawa oleh Asy-Syaikh Muhammad Amin Al-Syanqithi. Adapun perkara keempat beliau turut menyebutkan dalam perbincangan yang panjang, iaitu hadis-hadis Ummu Sulaim dan juga hadis Ummu Haram di mana hadis tersebut diriwayatkan oleh Imam Al-Bukhari di dalam 13 tempat di dalam kitab Sahihnya secara ringkas.


Hadis tersebut berkaitan Nabi SAW masuk ke dalam rumah Ummu Haram dan duduk dan tertidur di ribaannya sambil dia mencari kutu di kepala Nabi SAW. Ini antara hadis yang para ulama bahaskan dengan panjang.


Antara yang mengulasnya adalah Imam An-Nawawi, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, mereka meletakkan pelbagai pendekatan dan mereka mengkritik pendekatan orang yang mengatakan ini khusus untuk Nabi SAW kerana mereka mengatakan Ummu Haram bukan mahram Nabi SAW.


Sedangkan Imam An-Nawawi, Ibnu Abdil Barr, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, dan juga ilmuwan Islam yang datang sesudahnya bersependapat bahawasanya Ummu Haram ada hubungan kekeluargaan dengan Nabi SAW iaitu hubungan susuan. Telah menjadi kebiasaan masyarakat Arab pada ketika itu mempunyai ibu susuan.


Buktinya adalah para sahabat Nabi dan yang datang setelahnya tidak pernah mempersoalkan atau bertanya tentang perbuatan Nabi SAW. Tidak ada seorang pun sahabat Nabi yang bertanya mengapa Nabi masuk ke rumah wanita yang bukan mahram. Dan tidak ada seorang pun dari kalangan sahabat dan ulama-ulama salaf setelah itu yang mengatakan perbuatan itu khusus untuk Nabi SAW.


Orang munafiq pada zaman Nabi SAW sentiasa mencari ruang untuk menjatuhkan Nabi SAW. Lihat apa yang mereka buat kepada Aisyah ketika Aisyah di dalam perjalanan bersama dengan seorang sahabat Nabi SAW, padahal mereka bukan berjalan sekali. Pun orang munafiq menuduhnya sebagai penzina.


Apatah lagi kalau Nabi SAW masuk ke rumah wanita yang bukan mahram. Ini peluang terbesar golongan munafiq untuk menuduh Nabi. Tetapi mereka tidak menggunakannya, bererti mereka telah mengetahui bahawa Nabi SAW ada hubungan susuan dengannya.


Jadi hadis itu tidak boleh digunapakai untuk mengharuskan lelaki dan wanita bukan mahram memandang atau menyentuh antara satu sama lain. Ini sama sekali tidak betul dan tidak benar kepada sesiapa pun.


Kenapa orang mendiamkan isu ini? Kerana ada pemimpin parti masing-masing yang melakukannya, maka tidak ada siapa yang berani bersuara tentangnya. Ini adalah hukum Islam dan kita bercakap di atas Islam bukan kerana kepentingan parti masing-masing. Ia adalah perbuatan yang haram dan sesiapa yang melakukannya harus memikirkannya kembali.


Elakkan dari bersalaman antara lelaki dan perempuan tidak kira siapa yang menghulurkan tangan terlebih dahulu. Dan tidak salah jika kita menolak dengan beradab dan bersopan. Kalian adalah generasi wasathiyah sekiranya kalian dapat mengelakkan perkara-perkara seperti itu. Pilihlah jalan yang paling selamat.