Recently I read an article on MAS and Air Asia. HERE It prompted me to take a closer look at MAS from the financial angle. However instead of comparing to AirAsia I compare the financial statement of MAS with that of SIA. Why SIA and not Airasia ? The reason is AirAsia being a budget airline has a lower cost structure. Further it is always better to bench mark against a good competitor , isn't it ?
Although one would argue that it is not totally fair to compare the two airlines financial because of the different in companies size and different financial period as SIA financial year ends 31 March and MAS financial year ends 31 December. But in the absence of other info, financial statements comparison serves as a good starting point.
Now let us take a look at the two airlines' INCOME STATEMENTS.
I used exchange rate of 2.2 ringgit to 1 S$. The % shown is % to Sales of various expenses items.
MAS & SIA COMPARISON | ||||||
SIA | SIA | MAS | ||||
$S | RM MILLION | RM MILLION | ||||
YE31/3/2010 | 2.2 | YE31/12/2010 | Note | |||
REVENUE | 12,707 | 27,955 | 12,980 | |||
Staff cost | 2,155 | 4,740 | 17.0% | 2,164 | 16.7% | |
Directors Remuneration | 5 | 11 | 0.0% | 4 | 0.0% | |
Fuel cost | 4,195 | 9,228 | 33.0% | 4,384 | 33.8% | |
Depreciation | 1,714 | 3,770 | 13.5% | 373 | 2.9% | |
Armotisation of Intangible assets | 43 | 94 | 0.3% | 33 | ||
Aircraft maintenance | 342 | 753 | 2.7% | 1,467 | 11.3% | A |
Commision | 317 | 696 | 2.5% | 487 | 3.8% | |
Landing,parking, & overflying charges | 589 | 1,295 | 4.6% | 246 | 1.9% | |
Handling +in flight meal +crew+passenger costs | 1,416 | 3,114 | 11.1% | 1,389 | 10.7% | |
Rental of aircraft | 553 | 1,216 | 4.4% | 1,607 | 12.4% | B |
Material/Oth Engineering | 375 | 826 | 3.0% | 71 | 0.5% | |
Adevertising & Promotion | 210 | 463 | 1.7% | 93 | 0.7% | |
Computer booking system | 184 | 1.4% | C | |||
Insurance | 58 | 127 | 0.5% | 60 | 0.5% | |
Compay accomodation / Rental | 142 | 312 | 1.1% | 181 | 1.4% | |
Other Operating Expenses | 532 | 1,170 | 4.2% | 582 | 4.5% | |
12,644 | 27815.92 | 13,324 | 102.7% | |||
Operating Profit/(Loss) | 63 | 139.48 | 0.0% | (344) | D | |
Derivative Gain | 139 | E | ||||
Finance Expenses (net) | -68.9 | -152 | -138 | |||
Finance Income | 49.5 | 109 | 71 | |||
Other Operating Income | 92 | 202 | 0.7% | 536 | 4.1% | F |
Associated Companies/JV | 149 | 328 | 18 | |||
PROFIT BEFORE TAXATION | 285 | 627 | 282 |
Those highlighted in color : blue and red are items that seems to be defy logic and common sense and are further explored below:
A) Aircraft maintenance
MAS is about half the size of SIA or put in another way MAS has fewer aircrafts than SIA but why the aircraft maintenance was so much higher than SIA. SIA use about 3% of sales to take care the maintenance but MAS use a whopping 11% of its sales revenue to service the aircraft. AND not only the % to sales was high , the absolute figure was also higher than that of SIA. I could not help but guess and hopefully I am wrong that someone are getting really rich at MAS and indirectly the nation's expenses.
If MAS could negotiate /control this at par with SIA it would have made/add RM700 million profit
Should MAS management give the shareholders and rakyat ,the indirect shareholders, some thorough explanations ????
But I could guess the explanation:- MAS's planes are older etc etc etc ..... Will you the stakeholders accept such explanations, if any ???
B) Rental of Aircraft
Is MAS leasing more aircraft than SIA ? Could the MAS management provide some details for comparison ????? Why the rental paid higher than SIA both in term of % to Sales and absolute figures. Without the number , one could only guess and wonder ???
C) Computer reservation system booking fees
I could not find similar item in SIA report. MAS auditor or the directors have treated this items separately Are the auditor/directors trying to tell the shareholders to look hard at this RM 184 million . IS MAS paying something other airlines that could avoid ?????????????? Explanation needed ..............................................................................
D) Operating profit; no,not profit it was LOSS
MAS actually was not making $$ but loss RM 344 million in operation if the Income statements was arranged according to SIA format.
MAS audited accounts treated the interest income as operating income . To be consistent with SIA presentation , I put the other income below the operation.
E) Derivative Gain
SIA Income statements do not have this item. Is MAS betting or gambling instead of hedging the fuel prices ???? Will MAS make a wrong bet in the future and change the gain to loss ???
F) Other Income
The total Other Operating Income shown in the Financial Statement of MAS is RM607 million after taking out the interest income and dividends there still left 536 million without detail . This is not a small figures as it take up 4% of sales and without this MAS will suffer a loss instead of profit before tax. MAS management should provide more details and information on this other operating income. In 2009 this was RM265 million.
Is MAS entering into other businesses other than airline without the shareholders approval ?????????????
Well after looking at the financial statements , one would have more questions than answers............................ Answers will most likely unavailable !
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.