`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Monday, June 8, 2015

Rosli v. MACC: Will Abu Kassim be a ‘no-show’?

As the defence opens, questions are being asked whether the MACC chief will testify.
Musa-Hassan_rosli-dahlan_gani_patail_ramli_600KUALA LUMPUR: The epic legal tussle between prominent lawyer Rosli Dahlan and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) returns to court today with the defendants comprising MACC, its officers and the Federal Government expected to open its defence.
The case revolves around allegations by Rosli of his wrongful arrest and detention at the hands of MACC, then known as the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA), and a conspiracy at the highest echelons of government, involving Attorney General Abdul Gani Patail, former Inspector General of Police Musa Hassan and current MACC head Chief Commissioner Abu Kassim Mohamed to destroy his professional reputation by reason of his close association with ex-Commercial Crimes Investigations Department Director Ramli Yusoff.
Lawyers observing the case have told FMT that while Gani and Musa are defendants in another conspiracy for malicious prosecution suit, Abu Kassim is the prime defendant in this conspiracy suit but is conspicuously absent on the list of defence witnesses submitted by lead counsel for MACC, Cecil Abraham for this week’s continued trial.
The omission of Abu Kassim from the list is the most baffling, since he heads the list of 12 individuals who together with the Federal Government are named as defendants in the suit.
In fact, just as startling, they say, is the fact that Abu Kassim has not attended court even once since the trial commenced.
Part of Rosli’s case had included the testimony of former MACC advisor Robert Phang, who had told the court that Abu Kassim had admitted that there was no case against Rosli in the first place.
Despite this, Rosli was arrested and charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court under the Anti-Corruption Act, 1997 even before Ramli was charged. The charges were eventually dismissed by the court without Rosli’s defence being called.
FMT understands that no reasons have been given for Abu Kassim’s absence previously, but that with the defence witnesses about to take the stand, Abu Kassim is now said to be overseas.
To date, there has been no official word as to where he is, how long he will be away and whether he will make an appearance on his return.
Observers believe that the defence may be employing a ‘stonewall’ defence by seeking to shield Abu Kassim from having to testify in court.
They note that the defence to date has been pressing the argument that all the evidence of ‘animosity’ between the three and Ramli built up by witnesses called by Rosli is irrelevant to the present suit.
The same argument had been put forward by the defence without success in an attempt to get Justice Su Geok Yiam, who is presiding over the trial, to strike out substantial portions of Ramli’s testimony prior to him taking the stand.
It remains to be seen whether or not Justice Su will eventually accept that argument when the time comes for her to analyse the evidence and law when delivering her decision in the case.
For the time being, however, it appears that MACC has lined up two important personalities to give evidence, Azam Baki (the eight defendant) and Sok One a/l Esen (the tenth defendant).
According to Rosli’s evidence, Sok One had “barged into the office”, “created a loud commotion,” and shouted “tangkap dan jatuhkan kaki dia dan gari dia” (arrest him, drop his legs and handcuff him).
He was also alleged to have threatened to punch Rosli.
Azam, now MACC’s intelligence division director, was also present during Rosli’s arrest and, according to the evidence of Rosli’s witnesses, eventually succumbed to the protestations of Rosli’s office mates by ordering that the handcuffs be removed after Rosli’s wrists had begun to bleed.
Also scheduled to give evidence were other defendants in the action, namely officers Azmi bin Ismail, Moses Lawrence, Augustine S Manson, M Mohan a/l Mutaiyah.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.