The Industrial Court says her refusal without any medical justification is unreasonable and unfounded.

Kuala Lumpur Industrial Court chairman S Vanithamany said the claimant’s job required interaction with parents, school staff and children, which was why the school ordered all its employees to take the jab.
While the teacher has a legitimate right to be concerned about the side effects of any medication or vaccines prescribed, she said, it must be reasonable and supported by sound medical justification.
“She is not a medical expert. Her refusal to take the vaccine without any medical justification is unreasonable and unfounded,” Vanithamany said in the award handed down two weeks ago.
The teacher, a foreign national identified as Tifu, was employed by Peninsula Education (Setia Alam) Sdn Bhd from Jan 18, 2021, with a monthly salary of RM15,500.
She said she had performed her duties diligently until she was dismissed from the job in December that year.
Tifu said she was given an exceptional performance appraisal from the school’s principal in June 2021, and was also awarded the prestigious “Malaysia Outstanding Teacher Award 2021” by the Malaysian and Asia Pacific Arts Festival.
In several emails and Zoom meetings with school authorities, she had maintained that there was no law stating that she must be vaccinated.
She also said the mandatory vaccine policy was not in her employment contract although Covid-19 was already an issue and the Movement Control Order (MCO) was in place when she was offered the job.
The claimant claimed she had allergies that made it impossible for her to take any Covid-19 vaccine, and also argued there was no law that made the vaccination mandatory for her to continue working at the school.
Despite the six months’ notice required or salary in lieu as stated in her contract, she said, the company only gave her nine days and cancelled her visa, forcing her to leave the country.
In its reply, Peninsula Education said it had adhered strictly to the MCO and lockdown restrictions in Malaysia and bore the cost of vaccination for the staff, which was RM190 a person at the time.
The company said the claimant gave numerous “flimsy, unreasonable and unsubstantiated” excuses for her refusal to get vaccinated.
“The claimant’s refusal to get the vaccination was in breach of Clause 6.4 of the employment contract, where she explicitly agreed to all lawful and reasonable directions of the company and not to act in any way contrary to its policies and any laws of Malaysia,” it said.
Peninsula Education said it had urged the claimant to reconsider her decision, repeatedly reminding her that it owed its employees and customers a high duty of care.
In her award, Vanithamany said the company had a statutory duty under Section 15 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 to ensure the safety, health and welfare of all its employees.
“It is apparent to this court that the company had taken all reasonable steps, including having several virtual meetings to explain the vaccination policy to the claimant.
“These steps were taken as part of the company’s broader responsibility to ensure the welfare and safety of all its employees, as required by law and also its corporate duty,” she said.
She added that the claimant was working in an environment that required her to have contact and dealings with other employees.
Vanithamany said the claimant could not perform her duties remotely, as it was impractical for the employer to create special arrangements, especially given that she was the only employee refusing to be vaccinated.
“It is this court’s view that the claimant’s conduct in refusing to be vaccinated for Covid-19 was totally unreasonable. Based on all the evidence, this court is convinced that the claimant was in breach of her employment contract,” she said. - FMT
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.