Will Mahathir be sacked again from Umno?

After Najib takes the fight to Mahathir and Mukhriz in their home state, is the former PM on a hit list?

COMMENT

By Lim Kit Siang

The Prime Minister and Umno president, Najib Razak went into a political offensive yesterday when opening the two-day 2015 Kedah Umno convention, calling on Umno members to ignore “jemuan-jemuan” (bad characters) and apple-polishers as these people cause disunity in the ranks.

He said Umno was capable of remaining in power and win elections if these “unwanted people” were not in the party.

Who are these “bad characters” that Najib was referring to?

The persons who immediately come to mind are Umno’s longest-serving president and prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, his two-time Finance Minister, Daim Zainuddin and his “hullubalangs” like former Information Minister and Utusan Malaysia editor-in-chief Zainuddin Maidin.

It is most noteworthy that Najib has chosen Kedah to go on the offensive, making the speech before the Kedah Menteri Besar, Mukhriz Mahathir, when everybody at the convention and outside knew that heading the “jemuan-jemuan” slammed by Najib is none other than Mukhriz’s father, Mahathir.

Is the longest-serving Umno Prime Minister and President leading the list of “bad characters not wanted in Umno” by Najib?

After his blog on Feb. 10 quoting Shakespeare’s Hamlet about “something rotten in the State of Denmark”, Mahathir said he would quit “if he was the Prime Minister today” and suggested that Najib should “make things easy” and resign if he cannot perform.

Mahathir had not been quiet in the past month, but had waded into the RM42 billion 1MDB scandal which has put all the mega financial scandals in Mahathir’s 22-year premiership to shame in scale and scope, warning that Umno/BN may just lose in the next general election unless the whole truth about the 1MDB is revealed.

Mahathir supported the proposal by deputy prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin for a forensic investigation into the 1MDB since its formation in 2009, but went beyond the DPM’s suggestion that the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) should immediately conduct its investigations into 1MDB without having to wait for the outcome from the Auditor-General’s audit.

Mahathir wanted not just “an ordinary audit of the accounts” but an immediate forensic investigation by the police, independently of the Auditor-General’s audit, on allegations made against several people who were involved in 1MDB’s financial management.

Mahathir also called on Najib to explain the source of his huge wealth, that his office had declared as a family inheritance, but which his own brothers vehemently denied.

Najib was clearly responding to Mahathir when he said in Kedah yesterday that Umno was capable of remaining in power and winning elections if the “bad characters” were not in the party; he said the “the ‘jemuan’ are worse than apple-polishers and ‘batu ronson’ (instigators) because they try to pit us against each other, so much so our shortcomings are amplified, party harmony is affected”.

Najib said getting rid of these negative elements was important to secure Umno’s future.

Is Najib setting the stage for the expulsion of Mahathir from Umno, which will be another history-making event for Mahathir – out of Umno three times: twice being expelled from Umno, and once quitting Umno on his own.

In his speech, Najib said that he would not condone any wrongdoings and that wrongdoers will face action under the law.

Three outstanding cases out of a host of injustices, where wrongdoings are being condoned and wrongdoers do not have the face the full rigours of the law, immediately come to mind, viz:

• Who murdered Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu in October 2006, as the two former police commandos Azila Hadri and Sirul Azhar did not have any motive to kill Altantuya and blow up her body with military explosives as the duo did not know the Mongolian at all. Why is there a conspiracy of silence and total inaction by the police to investigate the “mastermind” of Altantunya’s murder?

• Who killed DAP aide Teoh Beng Hock at the MACC headquarters on July 16, 2009 and why were MACC officers whose actions the Court of Appeal had ruled last September contributed to Teoh’s death been promoted – eg Hishammuddin Hashim, promoted as Sabah MACC director?

• The failure to charge the Umno Minister for Agriculture and Agro-based Industries, Ismail Sabri who made a racist and seditious call on Malay consumers to boycott Chinese businesses; the former Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Mashitah Ibrahim who lied when she came up with the seditious statement that the Chinese in Kedah had burnt the Quran “page by page in a prayer ritual”; and the Penang Umno leader Mohd Zaidi Mohd Said who incited inter-racial hate, tension and conflict with the allegation that the success of Penang was because of the illegal businesses and crimes committed by the Chinese of the state in “broad daylight”.

How can Najib explain such egregious condonation of wrongdoing and failure to ensure that wrongdoers face action under the law in these three instances?