When the government turns on its people (part 2)

Hey, is it not Malay-Muslims who are trying to frame a dead Malay-Muslim Customs Department officer on charges of corruption and suicide? Is it not Malay-Muslims who arrested and charged the Malay-Muslim ex-Director of the CCID for "allegedly using a police aircraft and for allegedly not declaring his assets" (which he did) instead of the real criminal in this case -- a certain politically well-connected Malay-Muslim who ripped off Malaysia’s national airline, MAS?

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Zulkifli Noordin, the Kulim Bandar Baharu Member of Parliament, wrote in the weekend edition of Utusan Malaysia:

“Some Malays are willing to be used by this illegal gathering that is led by former Bar Council president Datuk Ambiga Sreevanasan. This is despite knowing the organisation has fought strongly against Islam, organised the interfaith council and supported Lina Joy’s apostasy.”

“But to fulfil their lust for power, these Malays are willing to become insects blinded by the false light of power. Malay-Muslims will become weak and damaged due to their own dirty hands.”

“Do Malays not have political power? The reality is that Malays have absolute power. We have absolute majority in Dewan Rakyat.”

“With this absolute power, not only can we defend and empower Malays, we can uphold Islam.”

“Instead, there were Malay-Muslims across history who have been ready to betray their own (race).”

“The biggest mistake made by Malays when they were too enthusiastic for independence and sacrificed Tanah Melayu citizenship to foreign races (Chinese and Indians).”

“This right was given along with the right to own land, determine the government and other rights. In the end, even though Malays became politically independent, they are still slaves in their own land.”

**********************************

One thing you will notice about Malaysia is that Malay-Muslims just love to scream about Islam and they just love to label this and that as un-Islamic or Kafir or whatever.

When they need to win an argument that they can’t win, they will do a magic trick and pull the Islamic ‘rabbit’ out of their hat. That is the modus operandi of these Malay-Muslims who do this mainly because they are bankrupt of ideas.

Actually this is all a load of bullshit.

Hey, is it not Malay-Muslims who are trying to frame a dead Malay-Muslim Customs Department officer on charges of corruption and suicide? Is it not Malay-Muslims who arrested and charged the Malay-Muslim ex-Director of the CCID for "allegedly using a police aircraft and for allegedly not declaring his assets" (which he did) instead of the real criminal in this case -- a certain politically well-connected Malay-Muslim who ripped off Malaysia’s national airline, MAS?

Please lah! Don’t give me all this crap about enemies of Islam and about defending Islam and all that other bullshit. The real enemies of Islam are the Muslims while it is ‘Kafir Laknat’ like Robert Phang and Justice Gunalan Muniandy who uphold justice and come to the defence of Muslims being fixed up by other Muslims.

Yes, let me repeat that. Muslims are fixing up Muslims and it is the so-called ‘enemies of Islam’ who are coming to the defence of persecuted Muslims.

Can you see the irony of this whole thing and can you see now that Zul Nordin is talking through his arsehole?

Let us continue where we left off yesterday on the series: “When the government turns on its people” (see part 1 here). This is where we stopped:

His family and the Customs Union have objected to the MACC’s smear campaign. That was why Malaysia Today ran the 4-part series on Ahmad Sarbaini’s death to reveal that the MACC would not hesitate to smear the good names of the dead if necessary to support their suicide theory.

They could do all that because that is how the system works in Malaysia, the MACC and PDRM will help AG Gani Patail to fix the people who pose dangers to AG Gani Patail, and he will clear the MACC and Police of any wrongdoing.

That was why on 31 May 2011, the MACC Operations Evaluation Panel (OEP) Chairman, Tan Sri Dr Hadenan Abdul Jalil, seized the opportunity to clear AG Gani Patail unconditionally at the same time that the MACC conditionally cleared Tan Sri Robert Phang.

Now, the language in clearing the two was very strange indeed:

“Kes siasatan terhadap Tan Sri Robert Phang, bekas Ahli Panel Perundingan dan Pencegahan Rasuah yang ditohmah telah cuba memberi sogokan kepada seorang Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian dan berpuas hati bahawa siasatan yang telah dijalankan tidak mencukupi keterangan untuk sebarang pertuduhan terhadap mana-mana pihak.

Kes siasatan terhadap Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail, Peguam Negara yang ditohmah mendapat pembiayaan bagi menunaikan ibadah haji dan berpuas hati bahawa siasatan juga tidak menunjukkan keterangan bagi sebarang kesalahan jenayah.”

Two days ago, the former Kuala Lumpur CID Chief, Dato’ Mat Zain Ibrahim, sent an open letter to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak accusing Attorney-General Gani Patail of burying evidence of corruption by senior government leaders between 1994 and 1996 involving losses of at least RM12 billion in public funds.

Mat Zain also blasted Tan Sri Hadenan for clearing AG Gani Patail and cited a policy ruling by the MACC Corruption Prevention Advisory Panel (CPAP) that the MACC Act did not allow the OEP to review decisions made by the anti-graft body.

It is amazing that with so much documentary and photographic evidence of Gani Patail consorting with Shahidan and Vincent Lye, the MACC can still say that the AG “tidak menunjukkan keterangan bagi sebarang kesalahan jenayah” (no proof of any criminal offence). This contrasted sharply with the statement that Robert Phang “tidak mencukupi keterangan untuk sebarang pertuduhan” (not enough evidence to frame a charge against any party).

Phang’s conditional clearance is a warning that he has to behave himself because now the AG has the upper hand. The AG can always direct an investigation against Phang to be reopened.

That was what happened to Dato’ Ramli Yusuff, the former Director of the CCID. Despite having been acquitted by the Sessions Courts and the High Courts, AG Gani Patial was not letting him off that easily.

Gani Patail has since appealed against Ramli’s acquittals all the way up to the Court of Appeal.

These appeals are coming up on 20th June and 1st July respectively.

When Razak Baginda was acquitted for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu, Gani Patail declared that there would be no appeal because the Sessions Court had made a finding of fact. Thus, Gani Patail will respect thatfinding of fact.

Malaysia Today will now prove that Gani Patail’s respect for the court is as selective as his selective prosecution.

Malaysia Today has studied the full Grounds of Judgment by Justice Gunalan Muniandy in “PP v Dato Ramli Bin Yusuff” in Criminal Case No.: 61-31 -2007 -- pages 355 to 376, which forms part of a larger appeal record that runs into volumes and volumes of documents, and is too long to reproduce.

(Nevertheless, you can view five of the relevant scanned pages below).

Page 355 reads as follows:

“The material facts are mainly undisputed. This case has its beginning on 17.07.2007 upon the service of a “Notice To Disclose lnformation”. [see Exhibit P. 1].

Exhibit P 1 was issued by the Deputy Public Prosecutor [DPP] named therein PW 34 (Anthony Kevin Morais).

A (Dato’ Ramli) complied duly filing a Declaration of Assets dated [Exhibit P 4] and serving it on PW 34 on 17.09.2007 which was well within the stipulated deadline.

Exhibit P 1 was issued by PW 34 acting under the powers vested in the Public Prosecutor (PP) pursuant to s.32(1) of ACA '97 purportedly on the belief that there existed reasonable grounds that A had committed an offence under s. 11(a) of the Act, based specifically on No. Aduan: 098/2007 [Exhibit P 8].

On 01 -11.2007, A. was arrested and voluntarily gave a statement of Accused under 5.45(3), ACA, 1997, [Exhibit D. .111. Whether a prima facie case has been made out against A.

Then at pages 361 and 362, Judge Gunalen made a damning judgment against Kevin Morais:

“…. the documentary evidence exhibited considered in their totality indicate manifestly that at the material time no sufficient and reasonable grounds existed to justify the belief that A. had committed an offence under S.11(a) of ACA, 1997. Investigations appeared to be ongoing at that point in time. Hence, I found that Exhibit P. 1 and P. 2 were invalid and bad in law for non-compliance with the express requirements of S.32(1)(a). ACA 1997 and thus, cannot found the present charges which ought to be held groundless. The reasons given by PW.34 for his satisfaction and belief that A. had committed the predicated offence were, in my finding, insufficient and unconvincing. This is regardless of whether PW.34 had acted mala-fide in issuing the notices which need not be addressed at this stage even though he appeared to have exercised his discretion in a rather casual manner by relying on the report of an officer who had hardly carried out any investigation. This officer had not even produced an iota of evidence that A. had actually received any bribe from MSC.”

Despite, Judge Gunalan’s crystal clear words that the MACC had fixed Dato' Ramli from the beginning and that DPP Kevin Morais was one of the co-conspirators to bring Ramli down, AG Gani Patail has insisted to appeal against Ramli’s acquittals.

All this shows that if you have friends in the corridors of power, you will get preferential treatment. Otherwise, you will suffer selective prosecution.

The pages below show that even the judge considers Ramli a victim of fabricated charges and that the charges against him were mala fide.

Yes, this is a clear case of Muslims not upholding Islam and of Muslims trying to fabricate charges against fellow Muslims. And it takes non-Muslims, the ‘enemies of Islam’, to come to the defence of Muslims and to see justice done.

Islam, every Muslim will tell you, is about justice. Islam is a religion that propagates justice, these Muslims will scream. But it is Muslims who constantly and consistently perpetuate travesties of justice while the ‘Kafir Laknat’ plays the role of upholders of justice.

As they would say in the legal profession, I rest my case. And Zul Noordin, stop bullshitting! I trust the non-Muslims more than the Muslims to see justice done. And these court documents prove it beyond any shadow of doubt.

ADDENDUM