Sabah papers intentional attempt to incite KDM

Other than the Perkara 20 or 18 in Sarawak, one popular political myth in Sabah that have been allowed to linger on too long and left not countered or explained effectively had been the illegal immigrant issue. The claim was that illegal immigrants were given IC to vote for Barisan Nasional and helped to topple the then opposition government led by Datuk Pairin Kitingan's PBS.

To settle this illegal immigrant issue claim once and for all, the Royal Commission on Inquiry for the illegal immigrants issue started yesterday. However, few Sabah newspapers and the usually twisted opposition portals like The Malaysian Insiders, Malaysiakini etc reported a twisted report of the first day of RCI yesterday.

One of the witness was reported to have said that some 73,000 immigrants were given blue IC. There are along being said but these media chose to subtly "highlighted" the fact that major charactertistic of these naturalised Malaysians are Muslims.

This has a clear motive to incite the Kadazan Dazan Murut (KDM) community that have long been poisoned to believe that it was intended to dilute the number of the largest racial segment in Sabah, which are predominantly Muslims.

The Sabah paper is below:

The usual devil's covert portal can be read HERE, HERE, and the idiot one HERE

In a predominantly rural population of Sabah, these kind of simplistic and sweeping accusation have a tendency to spread and believed upon easily.

The truth to the matter is simple.

For the short denial, such simplistic generatlisation is not true. It is not only Muslims that received blue IC but also other races including Chinese.

The long answer for any of the thinking readers is to understand the regional political condition of the times. The southermn part of Phillines, particularly in the island of Mindanao and the many southern islands are in a state of war.

The Marcos regime were diluting the Muslim population of Mindanao by transfering Christian Phillipines from elsewhere. This has lead to a struggle for independence by political groups in the south for autonomy.

There was a short reprise for only a few years in which Nur Misuari became Governor. But it was only  resolved recently and only then did Mindanao practically gained autonomy. To give compliment where it is due, it happened during Najib.

Basically, the area had been in a constant flux.

Historically, these so-called illegal immigrants are indigenous or"pribumi" of Sabah and near areas. They have been moving in and out between the Phillipines and Sabah.

A close anthropological study will show that there many common people like the Bajau, Bisaya, etc can be  found in Phillipines, Sabah and even down to Sarawak. These are part of highly mobile maritime region of  Nusantara or Malay archipelago.

That is why as Javanese or Bugis or Bajar is as much a Pribumi in Malaya or Sumatra or Borneo. The mechanism to be accepted by a certain area lies with the Malay proverb, "Masuk kandang kambing mengembak, masuk kandang lembu menguak."Nusantara has a hisory and tradition of berkelana. 

Naturally, when war broke out and lasted for decades and perhaps more than half a century, some of the population will move away for safety to others areas within their natural abode, like Sabah.

These people have been there for ages and have a natural rights under a Jus Sanguine principle to be citiens. This point is rased to tell those Chinese DAPs or SAPPs to shut up and not interfere.

Chinese in Malaya were given citizenship just prior to Merdeka under a Jus Soli arrangement. Chinese or Indian are not indigenoeous people or original popullants of Malaya but are given citizenship by our rulers and leaders.

Despite widespread resistance and pockets of such sentiment can still be found among the older Malays, our forefathers did it against popular opinions because we wanted to build a nation.

These so-called illegal immigrants have more natural rights than immigrants from a faraway land with alien culture, religion and lifestyle. There is no attempt to tell Chinese or Indians that they should not be citizens but telling history plainly. 

Itu pun sekarang ramai dah besar kepala dan mahu ketepikan warisan dan tuntutan adat, ugama dan pentadbiran orang asal. 

Back to the Muslim status of immigrants in the RCI, one will naturally find that the main characteristic of immigrants are Muslims because they are being prosecuted and diluted by Marcos. There is no reasons for the Christians to run and live a life of political refugees.

After being here for so long and for many generations, these people do not have any more roots in Mindanao. No more property or immediate family.

For that matter, they have adopted Malaysia and would have cheered for the then most feared Malaysian trio strikers of Mokhar Dahari, Shukor Salleh and James Wong in the political turmoil during the era of the the trio of CMs, Tun Mustapha-Harris Salleh-Pairin Kitingan in any match against any country, including Phillipines.

This attempt by the newspapers is nothing more than an insidious attempt to incite the KDM community to despise the Barisan Nasional government and sway the votes for Pakatan rakyat or STAR or SNAP.

KDM had long been duped to belief that the Federal Government had interfered into Sabah affair to bring down the Kadazan-led government of PBS. Where do such allegations lies when BN and UMNO have always left Sabah politics to Sabahans.

Sabahan are one of the nicest people on earth but frankly, no one can understand the Sabahan political psyche. Their practise would have been seen as unethical by the shrewdest of any politics elsewhere.

One that matter, one should ask Anwar Ibrahim who orchestrated the buy-out of Lajim, Bumburiang, and whole list of katak to jump out of PBS and saw the PBS-USNO coalition fall apart after just winning the state election.

Don't forget to ask also Anwar and Dr Jeffrey Kitingan of their plan of treason and helped by CIA to get  Sabah cessation from Malaysia. That will explain why the 20% oil royalty promise for Sabah and Sarawak by Anwar.

If the question is why 73,000, take account that this people are indigenous of this area and is as much a Pribumi as Jeffrey Kitingan or Lajim or Musa Aman.

Professor Ramlah Adam testified at the RCI and expressed out similar view. Ironically, it is Sabah Times that reported it, below:

Filipino immigrants here because of ancestral links – Historian 

Sabah Times 

by Nancy Lai.
Posted on January 15, 2013, Tuesday

KOTA KINABALU: Historian Professor Datuk Ramlah Adam said the issue of the presence of illegal immigrants in Sabah should not be politicised.

“We must avoid politicising the issue especially during election time because this is not sincere in resolving the issue,” she said, when giving evidence to the Royal Commission of Inquiry on the presence of illegal immigrants in Sabah here yesterday.

Ramlah was one of the three witnesses called to give evidence on the first day of the Commission’s hearing yesterday before it was abruptly halted because of a bomb hoax about 2.40 pm.

Ramlah and Professor Ranjit Singh were asked on the history and demography of Sabah while the third witness was former head of the Settlement Unit under the Chief Minister’s Department, Abd Jaafar Alip.

“We must look at this as a national issue, not a political one. We must be professional in resolving it,” she said.

She said that in her opinion the people from the Southern Philippines came to Sabah because of the ancestral links between the state and the Republic.

To conducting officer Manoj Kurup’s question as to what are these links, Ramlah said these are unwritten ties including religion, family and the maritime boundaries which were passed down from generations to generations in the Southern Philippines.

And because this area was governed by the Sulu Sultanate in the past, some of those in the Southern Philippines feel that Sabah is still a part of the Sulu Sultanate which is why they come to Sabah, she said. 

Even though the Sulu Sultanate is not in existence any more, some people in the Southern Philippines still continue to practise the sultanate system which they inherited from their ancestors, she said, adding that her studies showed that it was difficult to place a political boundary in those days as a Sultan’s authority was based on a few factors, including the loyalty of the people.

“From what I read, this is still happening now. From a historical aspect, they may not feel that they are entering Sabah illegally but because there are immigration laws in this country, they become illegal immigrants.

To the question as to what steps can be taken to resolve the problem, Ramlah suggested that because of their historical links to Sabah, these people should be given some political recognition and some programs initiated to get closer to them and to assist them.

“The influx of illegal immigrants into the country and Sabah is worrying because having laws against illegal entry are not deterring them. We repatriate them and they return, besides, repatriating them costs a lot of money,” she stressed.

“So we must look at this as a national problem and not a political one. We must sit down and discuss professionally to find a solution to this problem. There must be affirmative action to resolve the issue in a professional manner,” she stressed.

Ramlah was also of the opinion that some of the islanders in Southern Philippines may not recognize the Philippines government and this could be one of the reasons why they still come to Sabah.

The other reason was that they are fleeing from the political unrest in their homeland so that they can find a better life elsewhere, she said.

“Even as fishermen here, it is a better life for them away from the unrest in their home country,” she said.

If that is beyond their ability to understand, one can always asked back how about the 1,000,000 in Malaya?

One can always asked back what basis is to give citizenship to 30,000 Chinese that did not qualify for Jus Sli citizenship but could not be repatriated because Chairman Mao Tse Tong refused to acknowledge and accept them when it was raised by Tun Abdul Razak in his trip to Beijing in early 70s?

- Another Brick in the Wall