For some time now this blog has said that Chua Soil Lek will not be given a seat to contest in the next general elections.
On hindsight we feel rather stupid for even having stated the obvious.
Obvious? Yes so obvious, because the opposition would have had a field day with Chua Soi Lek's sexual trysts, not because of the affair as such but because what he did was an offence punishable with a jail term and fine or both.
Chua Soi Lek admitted that the man on the video was him, now it is also stated that the video contained parts of him performing oral sex.
Oral sex is an offence in our law and it is that part that he can be charged for and even jailed, in fact he should have, but for the mercy of the Attorney General. Now with his record Najib had the easiest time telling him he can't be fielded, and Chua had only this to say, "Yes Sir!" I suppose, he had no choice, no choice at all.
If he tried to lay down his cards and talk terms Najib would have had him charged locked up and getting the attorney general to do just that woudl have been the least difficult task for Najib, even though Najib can be investigated at least for so many alleged wrong doings which actually much bigger offences than that committed by Dr. Chua Soi Lek, but then Chua is only MCA's President and as we all know a party in the barisan which has become a toothless mouse.
Chua is reported to have said, "in the history of MCA, this is the first time that there is a full-time party president, I wish to continue that role in the general election, where I can campaign full-time for BN candidates, particularly for MCA,"
If that was true, that as President it is important for him to concentrate on campaigning nationally for the party and if it was to hold any water, then Najib should have been the first person to do that, not Chua, after all UMNO is so much bigger a party than MCA.
If as party president he is not standing he might as well stand down as president and allow a more capable person to take on that position, this only goes to show that the removal of Ong Tee Keat was not only an MCA issue but one that was dictated by UMNO at a time Tee Keat was so adamant about exposing the PKFZ scandal. Najib took over the task from Ong Tee Keat and today the 12 billion ringgit scandal is almost history.
So is MCA really independent?
In the past he had brushed aside Ong Tee Keat's Claim that he should not contest the elections because of the DVD scandal claiming he was a winnable candidate anywhere and now suddenly he looks so concerned for MCA he has decided no to stand because of so many other "more worthy reasons." Look, we are all idiots and are supposed to buy that, the lame excuses of the MCA President.
Now this brings ot examine MCA's role in the Barisan. As we all know the Barisan is only UMNO the MCA, the MIC, the Gerakan and all the rest are nothing but window dressing.
Chief window dressers are paid lofty sums via contracts, and other deals to make huge amounts of money, so every Ah Kow, Kow Chye, and Soi Lek wants to be the president of MCA, but if Soil Lek looks back all former MCA president's were ministers with very important portfolios and he has none, although he was made to step down from the Health Ministry adn at that time he was not the MCA President.
He can't take Najib to task, because as the president he has now power over Najib but that Najib has all the power over him, does this not expose the MCA.
Chau Soi Lek and his Star newspaper will give all the "noble" excuses for his not standing, but we Malaysians are not fools, is it so coincidental that the President of the MCA and the President of Wanita UMNO are not being fielded, one with a sex case cum scandal hanging over his head for which no action has been taken yet, and the other all because of cows.
After the next General Elections both these leaders will walk down sunseet strip, as the sun will set on their political career, and is it really even worth mentioning it here? It is again a matter of stating the obvious.
What political career can these two presidents have if they are not privy to cabinet decisions, if the are not privy in arguing out the interests of the people they are supposed to be championing? Hw effective can they be?
In truth it really does not matter in the Barisan in the case for MCA at least after all anything MCA gets comes from UMNO and on the generosity of UMNO, that is why no component party in the Barisan dared confront Mahathir when he questioned our right to citizenship.
Chua Soi Lek must certainly knwo MCA history, especially those parts related to Mahathri Mohammed, where in 1969 whilst standing as an Alliance candidate he told the Chinese attending his ceramah not to do so, as he woudl not be representing their interests in parliament. At that time the Alliance as it was then known comprised UMNO, the MCA and MIC only.
This same Mahathir at that time said, that the citizenship of the non Malays could be withdrawn, and when he came to power he said all that were his views in the past and that he had changed, then later he would credit the Chinese and say they were the biggest tax payers in the country, and now he is head over heels in love with Ibrahim Ali whom he supports because he sees Ibrahim Ali as a his best bet to put his son in power the crooked way.
Why was MCA so quiet? if indeed he represented the rights of the Chinese and is so charitable to Indians where he gave them the Buntong seat in Ipoh as he claims, why as such a champion he stood with his tail between his ligs when Mahathir asked such questions in the face o fhim giving illegal immigrants the blue NRIC.
The last time I said Samy Velu is a better leader than Najib, now it looks like he is a better leader than Chua Soi Lek as well, not that Samy is the best - far from it, but certainly better than both these clowns - don't believe me ask Mahathir.
| Putting on a brave front and hiding the disappointment |
Obvious? Yes so obvious, because the opposition would have had a field day with Chua Soi Lek's sexual trysts, not because of the affair as such but because what he did was an offence punishable with a jail term and fine or both.
Chua Soi Lek admitted that the man on the video was him, now it is also stated that the video contained parts of him performing oral sex.
Oral sex is an offence in our law and it is that part that he can be charged for and even jailed, in fact he should have, but for the mercy of the Attorney General. Now with his record Najib had the easiest time telling him he can't be fielded, and Chua had only this to say, "Yes Sir!" I suppose, he had no choice, no choice at all.
If he tried to lay down his cards and talk terms Najib would have had him charged locked up and getting the attorney general to do just that woudl have been the least difficult task for Najib, even though Najib can be investigated at least for so many alleged wrong doings which actually much bigger offences than that committed by Dr. Chua Soi Lek, but then Chua is only MCA's President and as we all know a party in the barisan which has become a toothless mouse.
Chua is reported to have said, "in the history of MCA, this is the first time that there is a full-time party president, I wish to continue that role in the general election, where I can campaign full-time for BN candidates, particularly for MCA,"
 |
| Following Chua Logic he shoudl not contest |
If as party president he is not standing he might as well stand down as president and allow a more capable person to take on that position, this only goes to show that the removal of Ong Tee Keat was not only an MCA issue but one that was dictated by UMNO at a time Tee Keat was so adamant about exposing the PKFZ scandal. Najib took over the task from Ong Tee Keat and today the 12 billion ringgit scandal is almost history.
So is MCA really independent?
In the past he had brushed aside Ong Tee Keat's Claim that he should not contest the elections because of the DVD scandal claiming he was a winnable candidate anywhere and now suddenly he looks so concerned for MCA he has decided no to stand because of so many other "more worthy reasons." Look, we are all idiots and are supposed to buy that, the lame excuses of the MCA President.
Now this brings ot examine MCA's role in the Barisan. As we all know the Barisan is only UMNO the MCA, the MIC, the Gerakan and all the rest are nothing but window dressing.
Chief window dressers are paid lofty sums via contracts, and other deals to make huge amounts of money, so every Ah Kow, Kow Chye, and Soi Lek wants to be the president of MCA, but if Soil Lek looks back all former MCA president's were ministers with very important portfolios and he has none, although he was made to step down from the Health Ministry adn at that time he was not the MCA President.
He can't take Najib to task, because as the president he has now power over Najib but that Najib has all the power over him, does this not expose the MCA.
After the next General Elections both these leaders will walk down sunseet strip, as the sun will set on their political career, and is it really even worth mentioning it here? It is again a matter of stating the obvious.
What political career can these two presidents have if they are not privy to cabinet decisions, if the are not privy in arguing out the interests of the people they are supposed to be championing? Hw effective can they be?
In truth it really does not matter in the Barisan in the case for MCA at least after all anything MCA gets comes from UMNO and on the generosity of UMNO, that is why no component party in the Barisan dared confront Mahathir when he questioned our right to citizenship.
Chua Soi Lek must certainly knwo MCA history, especially those parts related to Mahathri Mohammed, where in 1969 whilst standing as an Alliance candidate he told the Chinese attending his ceramah not to do so, as he woudl not be representing their interests in parliament. At that time the Alliance as it was then known comprised UMNO, the MCA and MIC only.
| Specimens of identical plumage |
Why was MCA so quiet? if indeed he represented the rights of the Chinese and is so charitable to Indians where he gave them the Buntong seat in Ipoh as he claims, why as such a champion he stood with his tail between his ligs when Mahathir asked such questions in the face o fhim giving illegal immigrants the blue NRIC.
The last time I said Samy Velu is a better leader than Najib, now it looks like he is a better leader than Chua Soi Lek as well, not that Samy is the best - far from it, but certainly better than both these clowns - don't believe me ask Mahathir.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.