Pegawai SPR dan ahli perniagaan didakwa kerana rasuah...
Seorang pegawai Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) dan ahli perniagaan tidak mengaku bersalah dan minta dibicarakan di Mahkamah Sesyen Kuala Lumpur hari ini kerana dituduh menerima rasuah sebanyak RM80,000 dari pemilih syarikat pelancongan.Rasuah itu diberikan agar Syarikat Southair Travel and Tours Services dilantik untuk membawa masuk pemerhati pilihan raya antarbangsa dalam pilihan raya umum lalu.
Ahli perniagaan itu Fizal Kamaruddin atau nama samarannya Fauzi, 32 dan pegawai SPR Muhamad Firdaus Mohd Ramli, 33 yang merupakan setiausaha kepada salah satu jabatan di SPR, dituduh menerima wang dari pemilik syarikat Mohd Noor Mokhid.
Kesalahan itu didakwa dilakukan bersama-sama di sebuah restoran di Kampung Pandan pada 16 Oktober tahun lalu.
Perbuatan itu merupakan kesalahan mengikut seksyen 16 (a) (A) Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) 2009.
Jika didapati bersalah, kedua-duanya boleh dijatuhkan hukuman penjara selama 20 tahun dan didenda.
Kedua-dua dijamin dengan RM10,000 setiap seorang dengan seorang penjamin. Hakim Rosilah Salleh menetepkan pendengaran kes bermula pada 10 Julai.
Peguam Datuk Sallehudin Saidin mewakili tertuduh sementara Timbalan Pendakwaraya Mohd Sophian Zakaria melakukan pendakwaan.
Beliau mengatakan Fizal akan didakwa kerana meminta wang di Mahkamah Sesyen Shah Alam esok. - 2 Julai, 2013.-malaysian insider
Senior EC officer claims trial to bribe charge...
A senior Election Commission officer claimed trial in a sessions court in Kuala Lumpur today to accepting a bribe of RM80,000 from a travel agency to hire its vehicles for use by independent foreign observers in the 13th general election.
Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Ramli, 34, who is the EC's Data Analysis secretary, was jointly charged with committing the offence with Fizal Kamaruddin, the operations manager of private company Mega Lavendar Sdn Bhd.
They are accused of accepting the RM80,000 from Mohd Nor Mokhid of Syarikat Southair Travel and Tours Sdn Bhd at Restoran Al Rawsha on Jalan Kampung Pandan in Kuala Lumpur about 1pm on Oct 16 last year.
If convicted for the offence under Section 24 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act, Muhammad Firdaus and Fizal stand to face up to 20 years in jail and five times the amount of the bribe.
The two were represented by Sallehuddin Saidin, while MACC deputy public prosecutor Mohd Sophian Zakaria prosecuted.
Sophian asked for bail to be set at RM20,000 with one surety for each of the accused, saying this was a serious case of corruption and involved a huge sum of money.
Sallehuddin argued for bail to be set at RM5,000 each. He also said Muhammad Firdaus had assisted in the investigations and that he was an Administrative and Diplomatic Service officer.
He also said Muhammad Firdaus is married and has two children, while Fizal has a son who is undergoing chemotherapy as he was suffering from leukaemia.
"Bail is only to secure their attendance in court," Sallehuddin said.
Sessions judge Rozilah Salleh fixed bail at RM10,000 each and also set July 10 for further mention of the case.-malaysiakini
senior citizen - And now the truth of The EC begins to unravel. Ladies and gentlemen now we know what goes on in the so called EC. Only yesterday the truth of the EC's unprecedented cost in conducting the GE13 with bonuses and other costs like FAX, tel and what not thrown and the EC ended up with 400Million ringgit costs just to conduct the GE13. Today we have a senior officer caught for bribery. Next will be some prostitutes being thrown in as bonuses for the EC officers. Phew! this country has gone mad. May I call upon GOD to punish the EC for all wrong doings and most importantly for publicly ans shamelessly cheating all our citizens. When it comes to cheating, corruption and crimes of the worst kind Malaysia can be declared the world champion.
Onyourtoes - Yes, charge them by all means. But please don't divert. I still prefer the indelible ink case. It is very straight forward - 1. What did EC buy, food colouring or indelible ink? 2. If it was food colouring, what was the comparative price of similar quality? 3. If it was indelible ink, why was it not indelible? 4. Was there misrepresentation by the supplier – i.e stating that the ink was indelible when in actual fact it was food colouring? 5. Who in EC has made the decision to purchase from this supplier? 6. When making that decision, was that person aware of what he was buying (i.e food colouring or indelible ink) and whether the price was right?
Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Ramli, 34, who is the EC's Data Analysis secretary, was jointly charged with committing the offence with Fizal Kamaruddin, the operations manager of private company Mega Lavendar Sdn Bhd.
They are accused of accepting the RM80,000 from Mohd Nor Mokhid of Syarikat Southair Travel and Tours Sdn Bhd at Restoran Al Rawsha on Jalan Kampung Pandan in Kuala Lumpur about 1pm on Oct 16 last year.
Jail of up to 20 years if convicted
If convicted for the offence under Section 24 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act, Muhammad Firdaus and Fizal stand to face up to 20 years in jail and five times the amount of the bribe.
The two were represented by Sallehuddin Saidin, while MACC deputy public prosecutor Mohd Sophian Zakaria prosecuted.
Sophian asked for bail to be set at RM20,000 with one surety for each of the accused, saying this was a serious case of corruption and involved a huge sum of money.
Sallehuddin argued for bail to be set at RM5,000 each. He also said Muhammad Firdaus had assisted in the investigations and that he was an Administrative and Diplomatic Service officer.
He also said Muhammad Firdaus is married and has two children, while Fizal has a son who is undergoing chemotherapy as he was suffering from leukaemia.
"Bail is only to secure their attendance in court," Sallehuddin said.
Sessions judge Rozilah Salleh fixed bail at RM10,000 each and also set July 10 for further mention of the case.-malaysiakini
senior citizen - And now the truth of The EC begins to unravel. Ladies and gentlemen now we know what goes on in the so called EC. Only yesterday the truth of the EC's unprecedented cost in conducting the GE13 with bonuses and other costs like FAX, tel and what not thrown and the EC ended up with 400Million ringgit costs just to conduct the GE13. Today we have a senior officer caught for bribery. Next will be some prostitutes being thrown in as bonuses for the EC officers. Phew! this country has gone mad. May I call upon GOD to punish the EC for all wrong doings and most importantly for publicly ans shamelessly cheating all our citizens. When it comes to cheating, corruption and crimes of the worst kind Malaysia can be declared the world champion.
Onyourtoes - Yes, charge them by all means. But please don't divert. I still prefer the indelible ink case. It is very straight forward - 1. What did EC buy, food colouring or indelible ink? 2. If it was food colouring, what was the comparative price of similar quality? 3. If it was indelible ink, why was it not indelible? 4. Was there misrepresentation by the supplier – i.e stating that the ink was indelible when in actual fact it was food colouring? 5. Who in EC has made the decision to purchase from this supplier? 6. When making that decision, was that person aware of what he was buying (i.e food colouring or indelible ink) and whether the price was right?
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.