THE Shah Alam High Court has denied an application by three devotees of the Sri Maha Mariamman Temple in Seafield to restrain One City Development from taking over the land that the temple sits on.
“He refused to give the stay. No cost awarded,” said the applicants’ lawyer, S. Mogan, after a hearing with justice Gunalan Muniandy in chambers this morning along with lawyers from the developer.
“The court, after reading all the grounds and everything, put in such a way that the plaintiff don’t have grounds to get a stay,” he said, but added that the trio’s civil suit against One City will still proceed. -the malaysian insight
High Court rejects bid to postpone Seafield temple relocation
SHAH ALAM: The High Court here has rejected a bid to postpone the relocation of the Seafield Sri Maha Mariamman Temple in USJ 25 that was at the centre of riots earlier this week.
Three individuals acting as the administrators of the temple filed an application at the Shah Alam High Court here Thursday (Nov 29) to strike out the eviction order.
However, the High Court dismissed the injunction against a 2014 consent judgement ordering the temple to be relocated.
Lawyer S. Morgan, representing plaintiff Thangaraju Sundarajoo, told reporters that the court refused to allow the temple to stay but ruled the main civil suit against One City Development Bhd, the Selangor state government and the opposing temple faction will go on.
“The court, after reading through all the grounds, ruled that the plaintiffs don’t have grounds to get a stay at no cost,” he said.
Temple taskforce representative V.K. Regu said they might resubmit the application before a new judge.
Advisor Datuk Seri S. Subramaniam said the Selangor state government had previously awarded the land to the temple in 1987 and again in 2001.
On March 11, 2014, in a consent judgement recorded in the Shah Alam High Court, four parties – the temple committee, landowner One City, the Selangor state government, and the temple’s opposing committee led by M. Nagaraju – agreed to the relocation of the temple to USJ 23, some 2.7km away from its current location in USJ 25.
One City agreed to donate RM1.5mil in compensation for the construction of a new temple on one of two plots of land given by the company.
However, Nagaraju and his committee later changed their minds, citing various reasons, and asked that the temple be preserved as a heritage site.
Klang MP Charles Santiago previously said that the developer was open to discussions but became unwilling after it was taken over by Philippines-based Ayala Corporation early this year.
After the temple was attacked by a group of thugs early Monday (Nov 26) morning, a riot took place as people rushed to defend the temple. Several people were hurt and vehicles were burnt.
More than 20 people have been arrested in connection with the riots.
On Wednesday (Nov 28), Home Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin alleged that lawyers to the developer had hired the Malay thugs, which led to the riots.
One City Development has denied the allegation. – THE STAR
THE MALAYSIAN INSIGHT / THE STAR
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.