High Court judge Justice Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah says:
*The accused is charged with carnal intercourse against order of nature. The defence tried to paint Saiful as a witness who was not a credible witness and that he was not a good Muslim. With great respect to defence, these arguments are irrelevant.
*Saiful appears to be a truthful witness and his evidence reliable, with the minute details given in his account.
*Therefore, the next question is whether there is evidence to corroborate Saiful's statements.
*The three doctors who testified confirmed that there was penile penetration.
MORE TO FOLLOW
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.