`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Sunday, September 4, 2011

Mat Sabu's Silap Mata

It was in July when I first saw Mat Sabu - a jovial gentleman in his wheelchair giving his speech at the Ops Scorpene Fund Raising Dinner. Holding his X-ray films, he told the audience the injuries he sustained during the Bersih rally with the main intention of maintaining the credibility of his claim rather than discrediting those who were out to undermine him - and all that done with smiles on his face that reached his eyes. I had a good first impression of Mat Sabu - a jovial man oozing with earnest sincerity.


The recent uproar over Mat Sabu's alleged remarks about the attack on Bukit Kepong in 1950 during British occupied Malaya puzzled me greatly.

Mohamad Sabu, or popularly known as Mat Sabu, rocked the boat when he allegedly said the communist terrorists led by a Malay, Mat Indera, were the heroes in the attack on a police station in Bukit Kepong, Johor, during the Emergency in 1950. All the policemen and their family members including children were massacred. You can read more about the background of Bukit Kepong here. You can watch the video HERE.

Frankly, I have watched the video and cannot understand the furore.

Historically, the Bukit Kepong incident refers to an armed encounter which took place in an area surrounding the police station on February 23, 1950 between the police and the Malayan Communists in pre-independence Malaya.

The truth of the matter is this - during the Japanese Occupation (read HERE), the communists were fighting against the Japanese alongside the British and Malayans. There were many deaths. After the British left, fighting continued because of conflict of ideology. From one viewpoint, the communists were 'heroes' whilst from another, they were zeroes and enemies of the state.

Black Mamba, a commenter in Malaysiakini wrote:

Let's get this straight. The attack on the Bukit Kepong police station was before Merdeka - Aug 31, 1957. The country was colonialised by the British and all personnel who worked for the administration were under the payroll of Her Majesty, the Queen of England.

Those who went against and fought the British colonialists then are nationalists, irrespective of their party orientation. Those under employment of the British government, irrespective of their racial background, worked for the colonial masters.

If Mat Indera (Muhammad Indera), a nationalist with the communist party and his comrades, had successfully driven out the British occupiers, they would have been hailed as war heroes just like the communists in China and Vietnam who had driven out their own countrymen in the Kuomintang and the South Vietnamese Army respectively as they were aligned to the American imperialists.

Victors get to write their version of history.

Mat Sabu did not strike me as a loose cannon. Whilst others may argue that his controversial remarks have cast doubts especially among the Malay electorate where communism is taboo. I believe this is Mat Sabu's sleight of hand to deflect interest in the DUMC and Sodomy issues by throwing a red herring in BN's path.

Mat Sabu, a well seasoned politician, would have thought about the implications before making any public statements. In all likelihood, anything and everything could be taken out of context and twisted to dent the image of PAS or even to undermine his popularity. If not, why then a road show as reported here?

His speech has been blown out of proportion and taken out of context. All he did was to allude that BN has been manufacturing and using its own history. And we all know history is always written by victors, never mind the truth. This Malaysian Insider article echoes these sentiments. The 'enlightened' ones argue that much of our history has been slanted via selective perception with racial bias! If one has eyes that see not, and ears that hear not, one would accept that is churned out in the MSM.

Even Karpal Singh has called for Mat Sabu to retract his statement and to apologise. Doesn't he believe in freedom of speech any more?

In his latest post Easier to Talk, RPK has argued that both the opposition and government are identical in the manner in which they 'practise' democracy - allowing freedom of speech so long as what is said is in line with THEIRS. He stated that both do not respect these freedoms although they shout and scream about democracy.

If one traces recent news coverage, there is an inverse correlation between these three topics. There is a lot of fodder on Mat Sabu and the Bukit Kepong issue with focus on DUMC and Sodomy II is dimmed. Even the TDM in his usual style has joined the fray spewing more of his theories.

Judge for yourself how the Malay press flayed Mat Sabu in this Malaysiakini post.

With that fateful speech, it is highly probable that Najib's people are rankled because PAS and Anwar issues have slipped through the cracks and the current focus is glaringly ALL Mat Sabu Bukit Kepong! I am sure the public feel that Mat Sabu is the clear winner here.

- masterwordsmith

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.