`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 

10 APRIL 2024

Friday, November 11, 2011

PM Najib Misled The Citizens Since Day One

1.?”PM and agro minister lied on NFC”.”PM lied about NFC loan”.That was the headlines in Malaysiakini and Malaysianinsider respectively on 8.11.2011.But to many people,these headlines did not cause any ripple nor hearing something strange which they never heard before.

2.?Whether knowingly or otherwise,PM Najib had in fact misled or more appropriate to say that he has deceived the rakyat from the first day he was appointed as the 6th Prime Minister of Malaysia on 3.4.2009.

3.?On that historic day,during the oath-taking ceremony before SPB Yang Di-Pertua Agong,the .”Prime Minister swear in the name of Allah the following words….”Bismillah hirrahman nirrahim..Wallahi, wabillahi,watallahi. Saya Muhammad Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak telah dilantik memegang jawatan Perdana Menteri,dengan sesungguhnya bersumpah….”

4.?PM Najib affirmed in the name of Allah that his name is “Mohammed Najib”.The swearing-in ceremony was witnessed not only by two former Prime Ministers and their spouses, but more than 300 dignitaries who were present,and millions of citizens watching on their tvs.

5.?Again on 9.4.2009,when the PM announced his Cabinet line-up,flanked by the DPM and KSN, he gave his name as “Muhammad Najib”.

6.?However two and a half years later,on the 21st and 23rd September 2011 when the PM affirmed his affidavits in support and corrections,in his application to set aside his subpoena in the Sodomy II trial,he signed his name as “Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak” only.There was no “Mohd.or Muhammad” before Najib.

7.?The name “Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak” was written a total of 8 times in both his affidavits.Not likely to be a mistake.The affidavits must have been thoroughly scrutinized by at least, 4 very experienced solicitors representing him to set aside the subpoena

8.?Over and above that,the PM’s wife,Datin Seri Rosmah binti Mansor,in a separate afidavit of her own, affirmed on 21.9.2011,stated her husband’s name as Dato Seri Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak.Not as “Muhammad Najib”.Who would have more rights to confirm her husband’s name,if not his wife?.

9.?Based on all the affidavits affirmed by PM Najib and his wife,there are no doubts at all, that his name as appeared in his identity card is, “Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak” and NOT “Muhammad Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak” as sworn by him in the name of Allah,before the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong on 3.4.2009.

10.?Be as it may,PM Najib is still responsible to explain to the citizens as to the difference in his name in both the affirmations which he executed.

11.?Whether there would be someone from amongst the citizens that would challenged the validity of the Prime Minister’s swearing-in on 3.4.2009,is a matter of their rights and freedom of choices.

a)?A simple example in point is the ‘Akad Nikah’ ceremony.Just for some simple mistakes by the husband wannabe such as pronouncing a word incorrectly, or misstating the bride’s name,the process is repeated several times over until he gets it right before the ‘Akad’ being declared valid.

12.?US President Barrack Obama was compelled to retake his oath of office on 21.1.2009 after he made a slip on just one word during the official swearing-in the day earlier.

13.?If just a slip of that one word could cause the swearing-in of a US President be declared void,if not corrected immediately,then the mistake in PM Najib declaring his own name whether purposely or otherwise,is a more serious matter.

a)?Should PM Najib’s swearing-in is declared void,for using a name that is not his own,then legally speaking he is not the Prime Minister of Malaysia.If that be the case,then he has no powers to dissolve the Parliament expected anytime from now.

14.?I have written a lengthy letter touching this issue dated 8.11.2011,addressed to the Inspector General of Police and copied to the Hon.Minister of Home Affairs.However I reserved my rights in not divulging the entire contents of that letter since some of my averments, may be construed as subjudice to the on-going Sodomy II trials.

a)?I leave it to the Police to investigate certain contents of PM Najib’s affidavit which are suspected to be in violation of the law as pointed out in that letter.

15.?Nonetheless,I am fully aware of the powers of PM Najib and the Government machineries under his command.He may find ways and means to circumvent the questions surrounding the difference in his name between both the affirmations.

a)?However the issue of his name is not the main matter I raised in my letter dated 8.11.2011.Affirming any material facts which are untrue or misleading in an affidavit is an offence under the law.

16.?Whatever steps to be taken by PM Najib to overcome various questions that have been posed,it is hoped that he shall not allow himself to be trapped again such as the affirmations he made in those affidavits.He should take cognizant of what others have that could be exposed.

17.?What should be of utmost importance to PM Najib are his sincerity, truthfulness and openness since he is the Prime Minister.

a)?His abilities are not measured by how much powers he wields or his capabilities or the people close to him to manipulate facts or to cheat to remain in power.

18.?Be as it may,by affirming those affidavits PM Najib have effectively put his fate and that of his wife in the hands and mercy of a couple of scoundrels.May Allah have mercy on all of us.


Mat Zain Ibrahim.
10.11.2011
-anwaribrahimblog

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.