ZAHID, THE NEXT PRIME MINISTER?

The whole country is worried sick about the “shoot–first” policy, and understandably there has been barrage of criticism levelled against Minister of Home Affairs Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

True to character, he has remained defiant and totally unconcerned about the issues raised by his critics. In his latest tweet, he expresses bewilderment at how “these defenders of human rights” are only concerned about the rights of criminals and not the victims. He then explains that justice must be served, so when “we have evidence, we shoot them” because the victims (the majority of whom are apparently Malays) also deserve justice.

This is not the first time that we have been given a briefing on the theory of justice and human rights by an UMNO leader. Nonetheless, it deserves a response if only to remind the people how bad our education system must be if a senior Minister is apparently unable to grasp simple concepts like justice, human rights and the rule of law.

In a democracy and in a modern country, justice requires due and transparent processes exercised by and through an independent arm of the government—that is, the judiciary, where the accused has the right to be heard and to argue his or her innocence. If “justice” is to be determined solely by the Police and the Minister, who will shoot first and ask no questions later, then we do not need the courts and the Rule of Law.

'What about the victims?' - is this a strong enough justification?

The Minister says his critics see justice and human rights only for criminals. “What about the victims?” he asks. Human rights, for the benefit of the Minister, are basic rights recognised by the world community. All human beings are entitled to these rights, regardless of who they are.

People must be treated in accordance with the law of the land. We do not distinguish “what kind of human” they are before they are entitled to these rights. So, we are not in favor of any particular group, nor do we call them criminals and shoot them. We do not punish anyone unless they are arrested, charged and convicted in a court of law.

The Minster says that when the police have “evidence”, they shoot. What happens if the evidence is false or concocted? What happens if someone plants false evidence on the Minister? Shall we shoot him too?

I have come to the conclusion that leaders such as the Home Minister do not understand the basic concepts of justice, rights and due process in the administration of law. Such leaders are denied this understanding because our education system has been terrible for a long time.

Concepts and principles of law and justice aren’t very difficult to understand but they are not taught in our schools. As a result, these leaders do not comprehend the noble ideals they are sworn to uphold. I feel sorry for them.

Sycophants know his logic is flawed but keeping mum

On the other hand, I have nothing but scorn for those leaders who do understand that Zahid’s logic is seriously faulty—but they won’t oppose him because they believe he will soon become Prime Minister. No one offends the rising star. The fact that the country is now perilously close to becoming a police state is of no concern to them.

What else can I say but to appeal to the Prime Minister to rein in any Minister who makes foolish, wayward, and yet dangerous statements that can tear apart the fabric of our nation? Our leaders must represent the entire country and all her people, not just themselves and their “friends”.

It is not enough to wear Ferragamo shoes and Brioni suits to impress the international media and the world community. The world is also watching closely what our leaders say and do. It is incomprehensible that we should spend millions on PR consultants so we can look good and progressive in America and Europe, and yet the rubbish coming out of our leaders’ mouths remains so utterly frightening to any civilised human being.

http://www.zaid.my/