MyPower Corp is undertaking a study to reform the electricity tariff structure, said Energy Transition and Public Utilities Minister Fadillah Yusof.
He said the outcome of the study is expected to determine the appropriate tariff structure reflecting the actual cost of electricity supply.
In an interview with Bernama, the minister said the new tariff structure could be implemented by 2025, concurrent with the fourth regulatory period of Incentive-based Regulation, which covers 2025 to 2027.
Fadillah, who is also the deputy prime minister, said the decentralisation of the power generation sector has already been in place since the 1990s, and there should be no regulatory amendments on this matter.
“The implementation of the electricity tariff structure’s reform does not need amendments to the Electricity Supply Act, as its implementation is undertaken by the (Energy Transition and Public Utilities) Ministry through the Malaysia Programme Office for Power Electricity Reform or MyPower,” he added.
MyPower is a special purpose agency created to organise the key reforms of the Malaysian Electricity Supply Industry (Mesi) initiative that are aligned with the government’s economic transformation programmes.
The Mesi transformation agenda seeks to address industry issues and long-term needs concerning reliability, transparency, efficiency and sustainability of the operations and delivery of electricity in Peninsular Malaysia.
As for the amendment to the Electricity Supply Act 1990, Fadillah said it was still at a very early stage as the ministry and the Energy Commission would organise workshops and engagement sessions with all stakeholders.
He noted that although Malaysia’s electricity supply industry is often perceived as centralised, with state-owned or affiliated enterprises predominantly involved, in reality, the power generation segment in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah has undergone liberalisation since the 1990s.
Fadillah pointed out that entities like Tenaga Nasional Berhad or Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd did not operate as exclusive power producers.
“As of now, some 2,500 conventional and renewable energy power producers exist in Malaysia. This diverse landscape illustrates a more varied and competitive power generation sector than the commonly perceived centralised structure,” he said.
Impact on the people
Meanwhile, Fadillah said the government is considering implementing more initiatives to boost transparency in the operation of the national grid, including the full separation of the single buyer and grid system operator from the utility company.
He stated that the government would have to deliberate on the most suitable approach to reforming the electricity supply industry, taking into consideration the positive and negative impacts on consumers.
“Globally, different nations undertake various mechanisms to manage the electricity supply industry. However, each (mechanism) has advantages as well as disadvantages,” he said.
Fadillah said considering the development of the power-producing industry in Malaysia, any potential reform on the management of electricity supply should be given higher priority to ensure electricity tariffs are affordable for the people.
He noted that while open market reforms could lower electricity tariffs for consumers by increasing the competition and efficiency in the electricity sector, they could also expose the consumers to price volatility and uncertainty as prices would depend on market supply and demand.
“The biggest challenge for the liberalisation of the electricity market is to balance the competing goals of security, affordability and sustainability of electricity supply.
“Therefore, any consideration to reform the electricity supply industry or liberalise the electricity industry must take into consideration the economic and social impacts to the consumers, especially the lower income group,” he added.
- Bernama
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.