MRR2: a prime candidate for bus rapid transit

 

From Boo Jia Cher

The recent introduction of a dedicated peak-hour bus lane on Jalan Klang Lama, following the success of similar initiatives on Jalan Ampang and Jalan Genting Klang, has sparked renewed interest in improving public transport in the Klang Valley.

The excitement surrounding the launch of a bi-articulated GoKL bus has further fuelled these discussions.

A potential solution lies in the implementation of a bus rapid transit (BRT) system along the Middle Ring Road 2 (MRR2). As a major thoroughfare connecting suburban areas, MRR2 is currently grappling with severe congestion. A BRT system could significantly alleviate traffic congestion and enhance quality of life for all.

Benefits of a BRT system

First, a BRT system is a much quicker and more cost-effective solution than building a new rail line. Considering the government’s financial limitations, implementing a BRT can be a practical and efficient alternative in a shorter timeframe.

By utilising the existing government-owned MRR2 infrastructure and its connections across the Klang Valley, the BRT can substantially reduce construction costs and avoid the disruptions associated with land acquisition required for a new rail line.

Second, fewer cars on the road due to increased bus ridership on the BRT lead to less congestion, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved air quality and a decrease in noise pollution.

Third, BRT systems can drive development along transportation corridors, fostering job creation and business growth. The MRR2 currently creates a hostile, noisy and polluted surrounding area. By introducing new public transit connections and reducing pollution, the BRT would benefit both residents and businesses, and even boost property values in the surrounding areas.

How can BRT be effectively implemented on MRR2?

Successful BRT systems worldwide, such as those in Curitiba, Brazil, and Chengdu, China, share several key features:

• Buses operate on dedicated lanes that minimise interaction with other traffic and often include signal prioritisation to shorten travel times;
• Use of high-capacity, articulated “caterpillar” buses;
• The MRR2 cuts through several densely populated areas in the Klang Valley. To maximise its impact, a BRT system along this route should prioritise stops in residential and commercial hubs;
• Integrating the BRT with existing train/bus stations is crucial for optimising overall network connectivity;
• Platform-level boarding facilitates easier and faster boarding by aligning the bus and platform at the same level;
• Display boards provide real-time bus arrival information;
• Shelters with seating improve passenger comfort; and
• Fare prepayment systems expedite boarding by requiring passengers to pay before they board, similar to the process at a train station, instead of the traditional bus boarding method.

To address the unending issue of first and last mile connectivity in Malaysia:

• Develop a feeder bus and demand-responsive transit network extending to neighbourhoods near each BRT station; and
• Partner with local councils to ensure convenient walking and cycling access to BRT stations. Optimise surrounding land use for higher-density, mixed-use developments and pedestrian-friendly environments.

Potential criticism

Opponents of BRT systems cite the high upfront costs associated with building dedicated lanes and stations. While these investments are substantial, the long-term economic and environmental benefits surpass the initial outlay.

In contrast, blanket fuel subsidies, which cost billions annually, encourage car dependency, contribute to urban sprawl, and exacerbate traffic congestion.

Critics may argue that BRT systems cannot match the capacity of rail systems, particularly during peak hours. However, BRT offers a more cost-effective alternative by utilising existing infrastructure, such as the MRR2.

Furthermore, flexibility in bus size and frequency allows for capacity adjustments to meet fluctuating passenger demand.

Concerns have been raised that BRT systems will worsen traffic congestion by reducing road space for private vehicles. This perspective overlooks the fundamental purpose of public transportation: to shift people away from cars and onto a more efficient, high-capacity mode of transport. By reducing car dependency, BRT ultimately alleviates congestion.

The susceptibility of BRT to traffic congestion is another common criticism. Nevertheless, dedicated bus lanes and strict enforcement of traffic rules can effectively mitigate this issue, ensuring the system’s efficiency.

Rapid change is possible

A BRT system along the MRR2 corridor presents a compelling solution to the escalating transportation woes in the Klang Valley. It could become a more affordable option compared to the costly MRT3, but can also complement it and existing public transit, thereby decreasing car dependency.

By prioritising public transport over private vehicles on the MRR2, a BRT system can effectively harness existing infrastructure to alleviate traffic congestion, improve air quality and stimulate economic growth.

By offering rapid, reliable and accessible travel, this sustainable mode of transport demands immediate policy attention. - FMT

Boo Jia Cher is an FMT reader.

The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of MMKtT