Good news folks. The Court has ordered the Bugis to defend himself.
Looks like Bugis is on his way to sing-sing.
Here is the news :
Looks like Bugis is on his way to sing-sing.
Here is the news :
1. (Bloomberg) -- judge ordered Najib to defend himself
abuse of power in 1MDB.
abuse of power in 1MDB.
judge announced case will proceed
Najib's involvement in 1MDB unit was “pervasive and imperious”
personal interest beyond that of public office, judge said
Najib's involvement in 1MDB unit was “pervasive and imperious”
personal interest beyond that of public office, judge said
prosecutors called dozens of witnesses
Najib engaged in “planned, premeditated criminal breach of trust”
His lawyers said he had been misled by Jho Low
Najib engaged in “planned, premeditated criminal breach of trust”
His lawyers said he had been misled by Jho Low
case hinges on whether Najib knew RM42 million in his accounts
came from SRC International
“incredible” for Najib to say he wasn’t aware of sum in his accounts
he made no police reports and didn’t sue the bank for wrongful deposit
came from SRC International
“incredible” for Najib to say he wasn’t aware of sum in his accounts
he made no police reports and didn’t sue the bank for wrongful deposit
2. theedgemarkets.com
Judge finds prima facie case for Najib's defence to be called
judge said Najib approved short term loan when SRC cannot pay KWAP loan
This shows Najib abused his office for gratification
accused's interest in SRC can be seen in its formation in Jan 2011
until money disbursed to his account in Dec 2014 and Feb 2015
The accused had interest in SRC where he had total control
resulting in RM42m deposited into his accounts, a gratification
It is for the accused to rebut the evidence
I find the element of abusing his position has been proven
as such a prima facie case should be called
My comments :
Itulah Dato Seri, masa PM dulu tak mahu dengar cakap saya. Berapa tahun saya dok sebut pasal isu 1MDB dan SRC. I first flagged 1MDB before 2010. That's TEN LONG YEARS ago.
Even when this trial started I blogged here that your lawyer is taking an extremnely risky defense strategy by ADDUCING evidence and arguing kononnya you did not know what was going on and that JoLo conned you all the way.
What a lame strategy. Now you sudah kena.
Your lawyer DID NOT REFUTE the evidence presented by the Prosecution. Instead he acknowledged all the evidence presented and even introduced new evidence that has worked against you.
His sole defence was that you did not know.
Again Kipling's adage is proven - they are but nature's children.
Childish protoplasm running around in a real world.
Here is some free advise.
1. Get a new lawyer.
2. It is not too late to try other options.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.