https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/01/27/anwar-will-not-be-suing-yusoff-rawther-says-ramkarpal
Ramkarpal said his client not suing Yusoff Rawther over sexual harassment
initially instructed to file defamation suit against Yusoff
but Ram advised it was unnecessary as Solicitor General cleared his "good name"
(OSTB : Huh ??)
no purpose in filing defamation which would take considerable amount of time
This is what I said the other day, if this case went to court it would become a buttslinger for quite sometime in the Courts. (Buttslinger is an offtake on mudslinger lah). Anyway, imagine this :
Lawyer : Can you describe in detail exactly what happened?
Loyar : Yang Ariff, we request that this part be heard in camera. We also request that all mobile phones and recording instruments be turned off.
or
Lawyer : Yang Ariff we request that the Court visit the scene of the crime to better understand what happened that day.
Loyar : Yang Ariff we will need to stop at The Mall first to buy a pair of dark glasses for my client.
Ok the end of that. Now here is Khatry : ‘Weird and contradictory’ to drop suit, says lawyer'
https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/national/weird-and-contradictory-for-anwar-to-drop-suit-says-lawyer-haniff/ar-BBZmtFo?ocid=spartanntp
Lawyer Khatri surprised with decision not to sue Yusoff Rawther
over sexual assault when he and his lawyer adamant to do so
decision “contradictory” with earlier statements to sue Yusoff for slander
despite knowing solicitor-general (SG) not pursuing police complaint
Today, Ramkarpal said SG already decided not to act
Ramkarpal contradicted what he said on Jan 17
he insisted would file a suit “next week”
(OSTB : Good point. Despite the SG saying that there will not be any prosecution, Ramkarpal still announced they were going to sue Yusuf Rawther. So apa cerita sekarang?)
(OSTB : Good point. Despite the SG saying that there will not be any prosecution, Ramkarpal still announced they were going to sue Yusuf Rawther. So apa cerita sekarang?)
anyone can tell this is a contradictory statement
It is very weird and contradictory
“What is weirder is Ramkarpal stated SG’s decision cleared name
This is completely wrong
only authority which can clear anyone’s name is court of law
my client supposedly 'frivolous and scurrilous'
I also requested them not to retract their suit
Yusoff's police report, Section 354 Penal Code, criminal force to outrage modesty
SG said “contradictions of material facts” in Yusoff’s claims
insufficient evidence to prosecute based on investigation papers
My comments : There is a very old and well known saying 'the law is an ass'. Nothing to do with anyone's ass, the graboid or the grabee.
"Law is an ass" implies the law could be really stupid - like an ass (a donkey).
This was a precursor to the saying "junk in junk out" that came to be associated with computer programming.
For sometime now the law has indeed been an ass in this country. Not just the written laws but the institutions that are charged with upholding the law, enforcing the law, deciding upon the law etc. There are just too many asses in the picture. And in this particular ass case the law has been quite the ass again.
It was the law that said put the guy to the lie detector test.
Ok. Obviously he passed. Actually he aced it. How do we know this?
Because AFTER the lie detector the law summoned 32 witnesses.
Why summon 32 witnesses if the boy failed the lie detector?
Surely the security guard, the maid etc would have been interviewed.
They would have known who came in, who went out etc.
That alone would have settled the issue of 'alibi'.
Yusuf Rawther should counter sue.
Enough statements have been made public.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.