MP SPEAKS The government has pledged not to abuse Section 114A of the Evidence Act in the hope that this will soothe critics.
It is somewhat strange since, ordinarily, such a pledge is unnecessary. All laws are not to be abused. That would be illegal. There is no need for the government to say it. That is the law.
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz (left)is also in no position to make such a pledge.
He has no role to play in the investigative process leading to criminal prosecutions. Neither does he have a say in how cases are to be prosecuted. Nor does the government.
So, how will they enforce such a pledge?
The culture of passing laws which are accepted as capable of abuse with pledges of non-abuse makes a mockery of Parliament and the legislative process. It cannot and must not be condoned.
History has shown that laws have been enacted in Malaysia with such assurances only to be abused later.
A search on Wikipedia reveals the following of, and concerning, the Internal Security Act (ISA): ‘The stated purpose of the ISA was to deter communist activity in Malaysia during the Malayan Emergency and afterwards.
It is somewhat strange since, ordinarily, such a pledge is unnecessary. All laws are not to be abused. That would be illegal. There is no need for the government to say it. That is the law.
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz (left)is also in no position to make such a pledge. He has no role to play in the investigative process leading to criminal prosecutions. Neither does he have a say in how cases are to be prosecuted. Nor does the government.
So, how will they enforce such a pledge?
The culture of passing laws which are accepted as capable of abuse with pledges of non-abuse makes a mockery of Parliament and the legislative process. It cannot and must not be condoned.History has shown that laws have been enacted in Malaysia with such assurances only to be abused later.
A search on Wikipedia reveals the following of, and concerning, the Internal Security Act (ISA): ‘The stated purpose of the ISA was to deter communist activity in Malaysia during the Malayan Emergency and afterwards.
'The first Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tunku Abdul Rahman, defined the purpose of the act as to "be used solely against the communists..My colleagues and I gave a solemn promise to Parliament and the nation that the immense powers given to the government under the ISA would never be used to stifle legitimate opposition and silence lawful dissent".
‘The third Prime Minister Tun Hussein Onn, stated at the same time that his administration had enforced the act only with a view to curbing communist activity, and not to repress "lawful political opposition and democratic citizen activity".
It is common knowledge that the ISA has been used over and above what it was intended for. It was abused. And this became the basis for its eventual repeal.
It is appalling to note that, despite our having learnt that such pledges have proven futile, we still find the government of day, in desperation, making these promises.
The fact that such an assurance has to be given is an acknowledgment that the clause is open to abuse.
This is enough for the government to bring the matter back to Parliament so as to put matters right.
This is a matter which Parliament, and no one else, should decide.
‘The third Prime Minister Tun Hussein Onn, stated at the same time that his administration had enforced the act only with a view to curbing communist activity, and not to repress "lawful political opposition and democratic citizen activity".
It is common knowledge that the ISA has been used over and above what it was intended for. It was abused. And this became the basis for its eventual repeal.
It is appalling to note that, despite our having learnt that such pledges have proven futile, we still find the government of day, in desperation, making these promises.The fact that such an assurance has to be given is an acknowledgment that the clause is open to abuse.
This is enough for the government to bring the matter back to Parliament so as to put matters right.
This is a matter which Parliament, and no one else, should decide.
GOBIND SINGH DEO is the DAP’s parliamentarian for Puchong.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.