`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


Friday, April 13, 2012

“No Business Association Whatsoever With An Individual Named Michael Chia” ? – We Release Further Documents!


No business association with Chia? Then Musa Aman has a lot to explain, including the standing orders on Chia's various accounts to Musa's sons.
Musa Aman, Sabah’s Chief Minister, has come out to publicly deny that he had any business relationship with the timber trade ‘fixer’ Michael Chia, thereby implying that the hundreds of documents that have been released into our possession, along with the testimony of industry insiders, are false.
“ I wish to put it on record once again that I have no business association whatsoever with an individual named Michael Chia”[Musa Aman statement 12/11/12]
However, numerous bank statements in our possession (see example right) show the exact opposite.  They indicate that Michael Chia (Chia Tien Foh) was at the centre of a web of transactions linking Sabah timber concessions to payments made to family members and key associates of Musa Aman.
One of these associates, the Sabah solicitor Richard Christopher Barnes, was arrested and held in custody, along with Michael Chia, at the time of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) investigation into Sabah timber corruption back in 2010.  Huge volumes of documents were confiscated from Barnes’ offices by investigators, who prepared a major prosecution case.
'Nothing to do with me' - Musa's lawyer, Richard Christopher Barnes and Michael Chia together a a party attended by Musa Aman
Barnes and Chia are understood to have given full statements, admitting their involvement in kickbacks for concessions in the state and the MACC have told sources they drew up a dossier containing 40 charges against Musa, which was then blocked by his relative and close ally the Attorney General, Abdul Gani Patail.
Because of this failure to prosecute and the suppression of this evidence, we are continuing to review and release the documents now in our possession.
These documents strongly corroborate the allegations under investigation, that Michael Chia was acting as a collecting agent for timber kickbacks to the Chief Minister.
Michael Chia was in the timber business and regarded as the ‘collecting agent’ for Musa
Far from being forged, our documentation is extensive and wide-ranging and it is backed up by testimony received from Sabah timber industry insiders. The evidence also corroborates publicly known facts published in court cases involving Michael Chia, who was arrested in Hong Kong in 2008, while attempting to smuggle SG16million back to Malaysia.
One case in the Sabah High Court has already clearly demonstrated that Chia was acting as a “middle-man” between Yayasan Sabah and timber tycoons seeking concessions.  Documents produced in evidence during Chia’s prosecution for allegedly cheating a timber concession holder, Agus Hassan, include a letter by Hassan explaining he had been told to pay a kickback to UMNO Sabah via Chia.
The letter says that Yayasan representative Mohd Tampokong was refusing to issue permission for the logging to begin until Chia was satisfied.  Agus Hassan was later angered to discover that Chia took at least some of the profit himself.
Evidence in court - a letter from timber concession holder Agus Hassan to Yayasan Sabah complaining that Chia, acting in a "middle-man' role, was holding up the commencement of logging until kickbacks were paid through him. Why was Yayasan's Mohd Daud Tampokong allowing Chia to act as a "middle-man" between Yayasan officials and timber merchants? As, Chairman Musa Aman should explain.
But, why would Hassan, a man granted a concession by Musa Aman, think there was a kickback involved in gaining the concession and that Chia was the agent for Musa/Sabah UMNO?  Why was Yayasan’s Mohd Tampkong following Chia’s instructio?  And why did Hassan not just report the extortion to the Head of the Board of Yayasan Trustees, Aman himself?
These are questions that Musa Aman has yet to satisfactorily answer. However, our new evidence goes a long way towards doing just that.
From the MACC's document listing Yayasan's secret timber concessions - Agus Hassan's timber concession became the subject of a criminal prosecution against Chia
  1. There is plenty of evidence to show that Michael Chia was not only a “middle-man” between Yayasan and timber concession-seekers, but also acquired numerous Yayasan timber concessions of his own.  He has publicly acknowledged it in another on-going case in the High Court of Singapore:
“I am in the business of exporting timber logs from Malaysia internationally through my group of companies, including Rimba Kita and Rasanmewa”[Chia Tien Foh, Affidavit, High Court of Singapore 19/12/2011]
The MACC has listed numerous further concessions associated with Michael Chia as a result of its investigations (below), so why has the Chief Minister denied any dealings with Chia whatsoever?  As Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Yayasan Sabah, he exerts ultimate approval over all timber licences, including those given to Chia.
Chia-related logging companies, as listed in the leaked MACC document. Sarawak Report has further details of the logging concessions handed out to these companies, which are not included in the MACC report
These timber concession could only have been authorised by the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Yayasan Sabah, Musa Aman. They were awarded to a feckless young man, who had no experience in the timber trade and no family money before he set about presenting himself as the back channel to Musa Aman after 2003.
Same party, socialising with Musa - Chia became known for his extravagant life-style, exhibited by his string of expensive high-performance cars
So, far from denying that he has had no association whatsoever with Mr Chia, could Musa Aman explain in detail how and why this boy was in receipt of so many state timber concessions, granted by the Board of Yayasan Trustees of which he was the Chairman?
Chia, who was notorious for his ‘flash’ tastes, was soon exhibiting ridiculous wealth.  His string of high-performance cars included a Hummer H2, no less than three Lamborghinis, a Ferrari 430, a number of BMWs, Mercedes Benz and Toyotas.
Genuine businessmen can testify that it takes time to build such wealth from scratch. Investment and repayment of borrowed moneys have to come first.  And yet Chia enjoyed virtually instant disposable income in vast quantities almost from the moment that Musa Aman started to endow him with extensive timber concessions.
The Chief Minister has yet to explain why he chose to endow the young and inexperienced Michael Chia with these concessions.  He needs to do so, if his denials are to become convincing.
Millions In Michael Chia’s bank accounts were paid in by timber tycoons
All the evidence in fact points to one credible explanation, which was that money was pouring into Chia’s bank accounts from kickbacks.  This evidence matches the testimony of numerous sources in the Sabah timber business.
To begin with we can demonstrate from bank statements in our possession that luxury goods for Chia were being paid for out of accounts that were also receiving payments from timber tycoons.  We can also prove that these tycoons were linked to Chia’s own concessions in Sabah and to other concessions which were separately granted after 2003.
One of the accounts controlled by Chia. He closed it after his arrest in 2008 by the Hong Kong authorities - the US$220k was spent on a Lamborghini, according to sources, and US$500K was sent to Chia's BVI account with CTF International Ltd, from which he then sent payments to Musa, according to the investigators and inside sources
As we will go on to demonstrate, this very same Hong Kong UBS account controlled by Chia also received several major payments in 2006/2007 from a number of timber companies and made some interesting other out-payments.
The payers-in included the company Borion Enterprise Ltd, connected to a known Sarawak timber tycoon, and the out-payments included an enormous US$4million transfer to a ‘Richard Christopher’.
Chia can also be seen to have made a number of personal in-payments and withdrawals worth thousands of US dollars.
In-payments by Borion Enterprise and out-payments to Chia and to 'Richard Christopher'
Our sources have confirmed that Richard Christopher refers to Richard Christopher Barnes, the solicitor arrested during the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigation into timber corruption in Sabah and identified as the lawyer handling financial matters for Musa Aman (see picture above with friend Chia).
Questions for Musa
So much that fails to add up after Musa Aman's denial that he has had any relations with Michal Chia
These statements represent just a fraction of the evidence we have in our possession, consisting of numerous similar transactions through Chia controlled bank accounts, involving a number of timber companies with concessions in Sabah.
The Chief Minister has yet to provide any answer to the information we published in an earlier report, which is that one of these, a closely related account Hong Kong UBS account, was making regular payments to Musa Aman’s sons in Australia.
Standing instruction to pay Musa’s son
We can now provide further documents showing yet more payments from Chia accounts to Musa’s family.
Back in 2005 an account in Chia’s own name, managed by HSBC Hong Kong, registered a regular monthly standing order payment for Musa’s son, Mohammed Hayssam Musa, who was studying in Perth.
At the same time we can see that this same account was also receiving huge payments, amounting to millions of US dollars from the company Borion Enterprise Ltd.
No business relationship? This Chia account held a standing instruction to pay Musa's own son in Australia. It was also receiving hundreds of thousand of USD from Borion Enterprise. Balance US$1.7 million !
Both the Musa boys were, as we have already shown, accessing the same account to cover their expenses during education in Australia. If this was not a business relationship then Musa Aman needs to be clear about what kind of relationship he did have with Michael Chia.
"I did not have sex with that woman" - Musa Aman's denials are starting to ring as hollow as President Clinton's!
More detail on Borion Enterprise Ltd – the Taib connection!
So what is the significance of the Hong Kong company, Borion Enterprise Ltd, which has been making such regular and enormous payments to Michael Chia?
Borion Enterprise Ltd, is part-owned by a Sarawak timber magnate Ngui Ing Chuan, a major shareholder of the Taib-linked company Ta Ann. Ngui also owns Borion Enterprise Sdn Bhd and Borion Shipping Sdn Bhd, both Malaysian companies based in Sarawak.
However, the major shareholder in the Hong Kong arm of the Borion Group is not Ngui, but another company called Silvermark Consultants Ltd.
Who owns Silvermark Consultants? Timber tycoon Ting Pek King's son Peter Ting!
In turn Silvermark Consultants Ltd is owned by the son of Sarawak’s Timber Tycoon and Taib crony, Ting Pek King!  ”Borion came into Sabah flashing big money from the start”, one source related.
Peter Ting (Ting Sie Huong) - the eldest son of Ting Pek King has been paying huge sums into Michael Chia's bank accounts. Why?
This begs the crucial question as to why the Ting Pek King family were paying large sums of money into Michael Chia’s bank accounts?  Accounts that were being simultaneously used to fund Musa Aman’s boys in Australia.
Since Aman has come out to deny any associations with Chia or indeed any allegations of graft, can he please provide the fullest of explanations for this state of affairs?
Timber concessions related to Borion
Another major Sabah player linked to Ting Pek King is his cousin and known right hand man Simon Ling.  Simon Ling has been deeply involved in Sabah timber concessions since the arrival of Musa Aman into office and he is also closely connected in business to Michael Chia.
Simon Ling (Ling Ding Dieng) - The MACC's list of his Sabah concessions. These include a controversial steep area in Kuamut Forest where maps were re-drawn by the Forest Department in 2009 to make them appear less steep, so that they could be logged. The area is currently being razed, despite strictures against clear felling.
According to insiders Ling has also taken over the running and management of many of the concessions supposedly awarded to the young and inexperienced Michael Chia.
This corroborates with official company information available for all to see.  The company Top Merchant Sdn Bhd is the company that received the concessions to log Kuamat Forest.  The main shareholder of that company is Chia’s mistress Yap Siaw Lin.  However, the Director of Top Merchant Sd Bhd is none other than Simon Ling!
Top Merchant - owned by Chia's Girlfriend, Yap Siaw Lin, but managed by Simon Ling
Insiders have confirmed that the payments from the Ting Pek King connected company Borion Enterprise Ltd into Chia’s accounts are indeed related to the timber concessions granted to Simon Ling by Yayasan Sabah and to Simon Ling’s management of Chia companies, of which he is the effective concession-holder.
Yap Siaw Lin - Chia's mistress and nominee for his company shares in Top Merchant Sdn Bhd
Chia has corroborated Borion’s involvement in his businesses by acknowledging in court that the company has exclusive rights of purchase from timber logged by Rimba Kita and Rasanmewa, companies he claims to own.
Chia has come up with his own excuses for his relationship with Borion and the payments, which he describes as a ‘Trade Advance’ by a trusted business associate.  However, such excuses do not explain the payments made to the Musa family or the millions sent on to Richard Christopher Barnes.
Insiders maintain that Chia’s web of bank accounts were merely a mechanism for processing kickbacks are further substantiated by numerous other transactions we have evidence of through the same accounts.
These involve companies linked to other timber tycoons also with concessions granted in Sabah, which we will also be revealing.
Angel Face Consultants
Meanwhile, we can now further reveal that informants have told the MACC that a BVI company Angel Face Consultants is owned by none other than Chief Minister Musa Aman and that it has received kickbacks through its Citibank Singapore account run by a close associate.
We will provide evidence that MACC and Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC)  investigators took these allegations seriously as we unravel further evidence.  It raises further questions about another series of enormous out-payments from Michael Chia’s HSBC account.
Two payments of US$4.5million and US$4million to Angel Face Consultancy Ltd cleared out Chia's account in September 2005
In September 2005 the account’s hefty balance of US$8.5 million was cleared by two major withdrawals in one day in favour of Angel Face Consultancy.  That is a lot of consultation in just one day!
Denials
Musa Aman has denied any business connection with Michael Chia, even though Chia was a prolific operator on the Sabah timber scene after 2004.
If he wished the Chief Minister could take immediate action to protect himself against all such allegations of graft and kickbacks.  He could reform the system that gives him total personal and private control over the allocation of timber concessions in the State.
This is because the Sabah Chief Minister is also Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Yayasan Sabah, which authorises timber licences over a million hectares of state forest land. Why?
Yayasan’s negotiations are held in private and the decisions it makes are unpublished and kept confidential.  Why?
No arrangement could be better designed to allow a total abuse of power by the man, who controls both the Government and the country’s richest natural resource.  So, why doesn’t Musa Aman reform it? - Sarawak Report

56 comments:

  1. Soalnya, bagaimana Sarawak Report ini mendapatkan statement bank tersebut? Pihak mahkamah tidak akan melayan bukti yang didapati menerusi cara yang tidak sah kerana itu melanggar etika/peraturan jika mereka hendak membawa dakwaan ini ke mahkamah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think MACC would be stupid to give Sarawak Report the documents.

      Delete
    2. What is MACC say about this??

      Delete
    3. Would gladly if MACC can step forward and confirm these allegation whether they are true or not.

      Delete
    4. Cara 'bukti' ini diperolehi pun sudah diragui jadi macam mana mahu percaya keseluruhan cerita???

      Delete
  2. Pasal Yayasan Sabah pula, saya masih ingat sebelum Musa Aman, simpanan kewangan Yayasan Sabah sudah hampir kering. Tetapi selepas diambil alih oleh Musa Aman, beliau mampu mengembalikan simpana tersebut kepada RM3 bilion. Kalau Musa seperti KM dulu yang hanya tahu membazirkan duit Sabah, sudah tentu Yayasan Sabah dah tumbang sekarang.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RM3 bil merupakan yang tertinggi dalam sejarah Sabah, suatu pencapaian yang terbaik buat Musa Aman sendiri. Rakyat pasti tahu menilai kepimpinan MA dan menentukan samada beliau masih layak untuk memegang jawatan sebagai KM atau sebaliknya walaupun dihujani dengan pelbagai skandal yang mampu merosakkan imejnya.

      Delete
    2. Tidak sia2 Datuk Musa Aman menjadi CM Sabah. Sabah semakin ke arah positif.

      Delete
    3. If not Musa, then who is the best candidate to be CM of Sabah? His intelligence can't be denied. Under his leadership, we can see more progress have been made in this state.

      Delete
    4. I believe he won't do that. He may say it as he meant it.

      Delete
    5. kerana Musa Aman yayasan Sabah makin berkembang.

      Delete
    6. beliau telah memberikan keuntungan kepada Sabah lebih 1 bilion setiap tahun sejak beliau mengambil alih tampuk kerajaan negeri.

      Delete
  3. Bagaimana dokumen daripada MACC boleh terjatuh ke tangan Whistleblower Sarwak Report, MACC perlulah menjelaskan mengapa mereka tidak menggunakan statement tersebut sebelum ini, mungkin mereka merasai itu bukan bukti yang mencukupi?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MACC perlu menjelaskan dulu adakah dokumen tersebut betul ataupun palsu, yang sengaja direka2 oleh Sarawak Report. Pihak pembangkang yang semakin terdesak pasti sanggup untuk melakukan apa saja untuk mengalih perhatian rakyat. Tidak hairan juga jika disahkan dokumen tersebut adalah palsu.

      Delete
    2. hnya MACC yang boleh sahkan hal ini, selain dari itu tidak boleh dipercayai.

      Delete
    3. Hal ini perlu disiasat dan hasil siasatan haruslah dimaklumkan kepada umum. Jangan biarkan rakyat terus membuat andaian yang bukan-bukan.

      Delete
  4. Bagaimana kita boleh memastikan bahawa 'bukti-bukti' ini adalah benar dan tuduhan ini adalah sah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kenalah menjalankan penyiasatan yang lebih teliti.

      Delete
    2. Siasatan lanjut harus dibuat dan badan berkenaan terutamanya MACC patut mainkan peranan.

      Delete
  5. Tak kisahlah, baik kita tunggu sahaja dan lihat apa lagi yang Sarawak Report boleh mendedahkan selepas ini.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susah juga untuk membezakan apa yang benar dan tidak. Berkemungkinan Sarawak report mendedahkan apa yang benar cuma buktinya memerlukan masa untuk dibuktikan.

      Delete
    2. Paling senang kita tunggu sajalah siapa yang rakyat pilih next GE nanti.

      Delete
  6. banyak manapun dokumen yang dia dedahkan, kalau bukan yang recycle, yang telah diubah suai mengikut kesesuaian fitnah..

    ReplyDelete
  7. ingat senang ka pihak bank keluarkan dokumen2 sulit para pelanggannya untuk kepentingan pihak tertentu yang tiada kaitan dengan pemegang akaun itu??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All banks have a strict policy of confidentiality.

      Delete
    2. Mungkin ada pihak mendapat dokumen melalui saluran yang tidak betul.

      Delete
  8. makin dekat pilihanraya makin ganas pembohongan dibuat.. kenapa tidak dedahkan semua sekaligus?? atau ketika kes micheal chia masih hangat diperdebatkan di dunia cyber sedikit masa lalu??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. News that suddenly come out exposing a certain politician when election is nearby shouldn't be trusted. I'm sure there be more lies being exposed soon.

      Delete
    2. semua ini hnya usaha pihak tertentu untuk menjatuhkan Musa Aman.

      Delete
  9. boleh ka dokumen yang sekadar terpampang di skrin komputer dijadikan bukti kukuh?? Sarawak Report pernah mendedahkan dokumen yang mana nama pada dokumen itu tidak sama dengan pihak yang mereka tuduh.. beberapa hari kemudian artikel itu dikeluarkan dari lamanweb Sarawak Report oleh pengendali portal itu sendiri.. bukankah itu menunjukkan mereka melakukan pengubahsuaian isi kandungan dokumen untuk membohongi rakyat??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PRU13 semakin dekat. Pihak pembangkang semakin terdesak untuk menguasai Sabah.

      Delete
    2. dokumen yang hanya terpampang pada skrin memang sukar untuk diragui dan boleh dipertkai.

      Delete
    3. Asal usur dokumen tersebut harus disiasat terlebih dahulu. Jika benar, Musa dan sesiapa yang terlibat harus bekerjasama untuk siasatan selanjutnya.

      Delete
    4. semua ini tidak boleh dipercayai, hnya laporan dari SPRM sahaja yang boleh dipercayai.

      Delete
  10. dokumen yang ditunjukkan ini boleh diragui kerana ianya boleh direka-reka.

    ReplyDelete
  11. MACC will need to provide explanation to how the documents manage to fall into the sarawak report hands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If MACC can confirm the documents, it sounds more convincing.

      Delete
    2. MACC harus tampil dan membuat penjelasan.

      Delete
  12. This case only resurface back when election is just around the corner.Doesn't this tell u something??? Its obvious this is the opposition strategy to bring down MA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tidak juga, sering kali juga ada pemimpin berkait dengan kes rasuah, tetepi bukannya semua dikenakan hukuman.

      Delete
  13. These allegations are provoking. First they accused Anifah then slowly they relate these all to Musa and Michael. An obvious tactic to bring negative image on Musa's leadership.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The fact with many figures and statement, its sound so real and not sure is it a fake figure.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lets hope SPRM can proven that Musa and family do not relate to all these activities.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Musa cuma membantu siasatan, semoga tiada pihak membuat andaian negatif terhadap Musa sebelum beliau didakwa ke mahkamah.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dakwaan ini seperti benar dan bukannya rekaan. Kami menantikan perkembangan siasatan SPRM.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Saluran mana Sarawak Report mendapat laporan siasatan tersebut? Pasti ada pihak cuba memainkan sesuatu yang tidak diketahui.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Politik, macam-macam boleh jadi. Entah mana satu nak percaya. Tapi paling penting ialah rakyat tahu apa yang patut dilakukan.

      Delete
  19. Tiada masa Datuk Musa berkerjasama dengan orang seperti Micheal chia. Sebenarnya beliau tidak ada urusan pun dengan orang tersebut. Tapi hanya berita dan khabar angin yang direka oleh pihak tertentu. Maka kita tidak sepatutnya mempercayai semua itu. Tambahan lagi yang mana baru-baru ini Datuk Musa sendiri menafikan semua ini. Maka tidak ada bukti yang dapat menuduh Datuk Musa dalam hal ini.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Semua ini cuma permainan yang direka oleh pembangkang untuk menjatuhkan Datuk Musa Aman. Apa yang pasti kita perlulah menilai sendiri mengenai pelbagai isu yang dibangkitkan. Semua ini pasti ada sebab tersendiri yang dibuat oleh pembangkang. Datuk Musa Aman yang mana lebih memberikan yang terbaik kepada Sabah menyebabkan ada pihak yang tidak suka akan usaha dan kejayaan beliau. Bayangkan saja Datuk Musa dapat menyelamatkan Yayasan Sabah daripada bankrupt. Maka kita lihat usaha yang dibuat dan perancangan yang terbaik beliau lakukan. Maka sebagai penduduk Sabah kita perlulah menilai sendiri perkara ini dan jangan memandang satu pihak saja.

    ReplyDelete
  21. ICAC adalah pencegah rasuah yang sangat tegas, tidak ada belas kasihan dan teliti dengan kes sebegini. Maka kalau benar Datuk Musa terbabit dengan kes RM40juta wang haram itu sudah lama Datuk Musa dibawa ke mahkamah kerana bagi ICAC tidak ada yang terkecuali.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tapi sampai sekarang takda tindakan. So maknanya Musa tak terlibat lah tu.

      Delete
  22. Banyak lah pula watak yang timbul. aisshhh bikin pening isu ni.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hal ini hanyalah bertujuan menjatuhkan Musa. Jadi tak perlulah kita layan sangat.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Cuma hairanlah, Musa dah nafikan terlibat tapi kenapa masih ramai yang meraguinya. hhmmm..

    ReplyDelete
  25. Nampaknya Musa kenalah berusaha untuk tambat hati rakyat semula. W/pun masih ramai yang menyokong Musa tapi hal ini tidak boleh dipandang remeh. Teruskan usaha dan buktikan pada rakyat anda adalah pemimpin yang terbaik.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.