`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


Tuesday, September 13, 2022

Dr M says ancestry does not make him 'less Malay' in suit against Zahid

Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has claimed that Ahmad Zahid Hamidi deliberately raised racial issues in addition to damaging his reputation as an influential political figure in the eyes of the world.

Mahathir (above, right), 97, said in his suit against Zahid (above, left) that his ancestry does not make him “less Malay” or “non-Malay”.

“This was also brought up by the defendant (Zahid) only after I was no longer with Umno, which clearly shows the defendant’s motives and bad intentions,” claimed Mahathir in response to Zahid’s defence statement, which was filed on Sept 8.

Mahathir filed a lawsuit against Zahid, 69, on July 20 for allegedly issuing defamatory statements on the former prime minister’s ancestry.

The Langkawi MP also claimed that the former deputy prime minister indeed had malice when he slandered him by calling him “Mahathir, son of Iskandar Kutty” without making any inquiry into his background or ancestry.

Mahathir claimed that the defendant also failed to take appropriate and reasonable measures to obtain explanations from him before making the slanderous statement.

In his statement of claim, Mahathir said that Zahid had issued the allegedly defamatory statement during the Umno divisional meeting in Kelana Jaya on July 30, 2017, and the statement was reproduced on Astro Awani's YouTube and several online news portals, which can be accessed by internet users without any restrictions.

He claimed that the slanderous statement implied that he was not born as a Malay or a Muslim with the alleged original name of “Mahathir, son of Iskandar Kutty” and that he claimed to be a Malay when he became prime minister to gain political and personal advantage apart from belittling Malaysians of Indian Muslim descent.

Meanwhile, Zahid in his statement of defence filed on August 17 through Messrs Shahrul Hamidi & Haziq, denied that the statement made on July 30, 2017, was malicious, slanderous, and harmed the reputation of the plaintiff in the public eye.

The Umno president claimed that the name “Mahathir, son of Iskandar Kutty” referred to an individual based on the information in an old copy of an identity card, in addition to claiming that he also has no control over any video publication regarding his statement on the media platform.

Mahathir’s counsel, Mior Nor Haidir Suhaimi, when contacted by Bernama today said during the proceedings before deputy registrar Nor Afidah Idris via e-Review, the court fixed Nov 7 for further case management.

Bernama

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.