Rafizi is not the problem

 

 People are not fooled by bad politicians; they are fooled by those who sound convincing.

The issue is how easily people are impressed by him. He speaks well, uses structured arguments, has a confident tone and the ability to sound certain.

For many, that is enough. Once a politician sounds convincing, scrutiny drops, and that is where standards collapse.

Politics does not reward those who sound right. It exposes who can hold a position when pressure builds.

Parti Bersama Malaysia (Bersama) is being presented as something new. It is not.

Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad (left) and Rafizi Ramli announcing the takeover of Bersama

The same voters are being contested under a different label. Nothing expands, and the ground remains the same.

This is not a new force; it is a rearrangement. That sets the limit rather than entering new territory, and it is competing within an already crowded one.

Where was this version of Rafizi?

Rafizi is most effective when he is outside the system; that is where his strength lies - narrative, commentary, and positioning. The current phase shows it clearly.

Which brings a simple question. Where was this version of him when he had power?

The loudest version of Rafizi appeared after leaving office, through podcasts and controlled platforms. That contrast matters.

Does sitting in a studio solve the rakyat’s problems? Or is it an echo chamber where a few voices decide what millions supposedly need?

Rafizi Ramli speaking in his podcast

Power is not about speaking after the fact. It is about acting when responsibility is real.

The second issue is consistency.

Setbacks are routine. Losing internal polls is not unusual. What matters is what follows.

Stay and rebuild, or leave and restart. That decision defines credibility.

ADS

Starting again is easy. It comes with attention, curiosity, and expectations. There is no burden yet.

Staying is harder because it removes the option to avoid accountability.

So the question is not complicated.

When pressure builds again, what happens? Another exit? Another reset?

So what actually changed?

Then comes the familiar move. When things go wrong, blame moves upward. Point at the prime minister. Point at the system.

But at that time, he was inside the same system, holding one of the most powerful positions. So what was actually done?

Rafizi Ramli when he was economy minister, circa August 2024

You cannot be inside the machine and later speak as if you were separate from it. That is not accountability; that is positioning.

The same applies to claims about racial tension. If the system was weak, there was power to strengthen it. Explaining it after leaving is easier than fixing it while responsible.

Confidence is often mistaken for capability, and clarity is mistaken for control. They are not the same.

Speaking after losing power is easy, but acting when in power is the test.

So before accepting the idea of something new, ask the only question that matters.

What has actually changed? Not the tone or the delivery, but the substance.

Because in politics, starting is easy. Most can start, but very few can last. - Mkini

---

MAHATHIR MOHD RAIS is a former Federal Territories Bersatu and Perikatan Nasional secretary. He is now a PKR member.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT.