Suaram warns police chief's shoot-without-hesitation order risks abuse

 

Human rights group Suaram has criticised Kuala Lumpur police chief Fadil Marsus for directing officers to shoot without hesitation if they perceive any threats.

The criticism follows an incident in Kepong on Wednesday night, when a foreign national armed with two machetes attacked police officers who had responded to a report of violent behaviour outside an apartment unit.

One officer's right hand was severed in the attack but was successfully reattached during a seven-hour operation at Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Bernama reported.

Suaram executive director Azura Nasron warned that Fadil's directive could be interpreted as blanket authorisation for lethal force, potentially legitimising arbitrary shootings and offering unofficial institutional protection to officers involved.

Suaram executive director Azura Nasron

She said police must exercise restraint and use force proportionately, with lethal force reserved as a last resort. Azura also called for stronger scenario-based training in threat assessment and de-escalation, as well as prompt, independent, and impartial investigations into suspected unlawful killings by law enforcement.

“While police officers are trained to make split-second decisions in high-stress situations, those decisions must still uphold the right to life of all parties,” she said in a statement yesterday.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim raised the Kepong attack at yesterday's cabinet meeting. Government spokesperson Fahmi Fadzil said Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail also briefed ministers on existing police operating procedures.

“Under the existing procedures, police personnel are permitted to take action to ensure their personal safety remains the top priority during any operation,” Saifuddin was quoted as saying by Bernama. - Mkini

Politics of division, strategic alliances and Umno's tactical flexibility - Part 2

 

 Following the formation of the coalition government in 2022, Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's political strategy did not end with securing the deputy prime minister's position. Arguably, the more consequential phase of his political manoeuvring began after Umno entered the coalition government.

The fundamental challenge for Zahid was to restore Umno's traditional Malay political constituency without allowing its partnership with Pakatan Harapan, particularly the DAP, to undermine the party's identity and electoral ambitions.

This required a delicate balancing act: remain in government, benefit from executive power, maintain political cooperation with Anwar, but simultaneously differentiate Umno from its coalition partners.

One of the most effective instruments in this political strategy has been the use of race and religion as political mobilisation issues.

Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh has become a particularly prominent voice in raising contentious issues involving Malay rights, Islam and the position of DAP within the coalition government.

Akmal's political rhetoric has frequently placed DAP in an uncomfortable position. While DAP is an important component of the governing coalition, it has also become a convenient political target for those seeking to portray Umno as the defender of Malay political interests.

Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh

The political implications are significant. Umno can participate in a government led by Anwar while allowing sections of its leadership and youth wing to challenge the policies, statements and political positions of its own coalition partners.

This creates an unusual political arrangement in which a governing partner can simultaneously behave like an opposition party towards another governing partner.

It would not be fair to conclude that every confrontation involving Akmal is directly orchestrated by Zahid. Nevertheless, the political benefit to Umno is evident.

The party can maintain its Malay nationalist credentials, appeal to sections of the electorate concerned about race and religion, and create political differentiation from Harapan without immediately surrendering its executive positions.

Akmal's call for Umno to reconsider its support for the coalition government in January, alongside his criticism of DAP, illustrates the continuing tension within this arrangement.

DAP’s plight, Anwar’s poor leadership

DAP has consequently found itself in an increasingly difficult political position.

Despite having greater parliamentary representation than Umno within the coalition government, DAP faces repeated political challenges from its coalition partner.

Its leadership must defend its political principles without triggering a breakdown of the government.

This is where the weakness of Harapan's coalition management becomes apparent. Anwar, as prime minister and PKR president, is expected to maintain political discipline among his governing partners.

Yet DAP has frequently had to respond to political attacks without the kind of consistent and unequivocal support that a coalition partner would reasonably expect from its leadership.

Zahid, meanwhile, benefits from the arrangement. Umno can negotiate with Harapan at the federal level while competing against Harapan at the state level.

This is not necessarily a contradiction in Malaysian coalition politics; it is a deliberate consequence of parties having different electoral interests despite sharing government.

The Johor and Negeri Sembilan elections in 2026 illustrate the extent of this political advantage.

In Johor, BN secured 48 of 56 state assembly seats, including 36 for Umno. Harapan was reduced to eight seats.

In Negeri Sembilan, BN secured 18 seats, with Umno winning all 16 seats it contested. These results strengthened Umno's bargaining position and demonstrated that the party could regain electoral ground while remaining part of Anwar's federal government.

Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi

However, the results should not be interpreted as proof that Umno has completely recovered its national electoral standing.

Local political dynamics, opposition fragmentation, candidate selection and voter dissatisfaction with Harapan also contributed.

Nevertheless, they demonstrate that Zahid's strategy of maintaining federal cooperation while pursuing independent electoral ambitions has produced tangible political advantages.

'Keeping doors open'

There is another dimension to this strategy: the changing relationship between Umno and its traditional coalition partners.

Umno's willingness to accommodate Malay nationalist narratives while maintaining a working relationship with DAP has placed Harapan in an uncomfortable position.

It must defend its multiracial political platform while accommodating a partner whose political messaging sometimes directly challenges that platform.

At the same time, Umno has maintained the option of rebuilding relations with PAS. This gives Zahid additional bargaining leverage.

If cooperation with Harapan becomes electorally costly, Umno has the possibility of exploring a different political arrangement with its former political rival.

In other words, Zahid has kept multiple political doors open.

A weakened PKR

The internal difficulties within PKR have further complicated Anwar's position.

The departure of Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad from PKR, alongside former Subang MP Wong Chen's departure, represents a significant loss of political experience and organisational capacity.

Rafizi, in particular, had been one of PKR's most recognisable electoral strategists and a prominent figure in the party's policy and economic agenda.

Rafizi Ramli

The political consequences are clear. Anwar now faces the challenge of maintaining PKR's organisational strength, rebuilding its strategic capabilities and managing internal divisions while simultaneously negotiating with a politically resurgent Umno.

CNA's analysis of the political situation identified the departures of Rafizi and Nik Nazmi as a significant blow to PKR, while also highlighting the structural difficulties confronting Harapan.

This presents an interesting political paradox: Anwar occupies the prime minister's office, but Zahid appears increasingly capable of strengthening Umno's bargaining position within the very government that Anwar leads.

The question is whether Anwar's leadership has inadvertently provided Zahid with the political space to rebuild Umno at Harapan's expense.

Art of political warfare

To understand Zahid's political approach, it is useful to examine it through the perspectives of Niccolò Machiavelli and Sun Tzu.

Machiavelli's book titled “The Prince” emphasises the importance of political survival, strategic alliances, the management of opponents and the preservation of power.

Sun Tzu's “The Art of War”, meanwhile, teaches that victory does not always require direct confrontation.

Understanding an opponent's weaknesses, controlling the strategic environment and choosing the right moment to act can be more effective than engaging in open conflict.

And Zahid's political conduct demonstrates elements of both approaches.

He has repeatedly shown that political alliances are not necessarily permanent commitments but arrangements that must serve particular political objectives.

His relationship with Bersatu, his pressure on former prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin, his support for ex-premier Ismail Sabri Yaakob and subsequently his partnership with Anwar illustrate a willingness to adapt to changing political circumstances.

This does not mean that every political decision was part of a predetermined master plan. Rather, Zahid has demonstrated an ability to recognise political opportunities and exploit them before his competitors can consolidate their positions.

Comparison with Dr M

There is also an interesting comparison with former prime minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Mahathir's political legacy was built partly on the centralisation of authority, the management of political opponents, the use of institutional power and the cultivation of political loyalty.

These characteristics became associated with what is commonly described as Mahathirism.

Zahid appears to have adopted elements of this political tradition, particularly in managing internal party opposition and consolidating his position within Umno.

Dr Mahathir Mohamad

His handling of the 2023 Umno party polls, including the decision not to allow the contest for the presidency and deputy presidency and the subsequent removal or suspension of several prominent critics, demonstrated how organisational control could be used to preserve leadership authority.

I would describe Zahid as a political practitioner who has learned from the traditions of Mahathir-era power politics.

His political relationship with Anwar also makes the present situation particularly interesting. Both have experienced the consequences of Malaysian political realignments, but their approaches to coalition management and political survival are increasingly different.

Anwar's political philosophy has traditionally emphasised reform, institutional legitimacy, consultation and coalition consensus. These are important principles in a plural and democratic society.

However, consensus politics becomes a vulnerability when one coalition partner consistently uses the freedom provided by that consensus to strengthen its own political position at the expense of the others.

This is where Harapan's approach, which I would characterise as overly conciliatory and reminiscent of a Confucian preference for harmony, has become problematic.

Harmony cannot be sustained by repeatedly accommodating political confrontations without addressing their underlying causes.

Neither can coalition solidarity survive indefinitely when one partner benefits from attacking another while continuing to enjoy the advantages of government.

The lesson from Sun Tzu is particularly relevant: political opponents do not necessarily need to defeat you directly if your internal divisions and strategic weaknesses are sufficient to undermine your position.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim

In this respect, Zahid has demonstrated considerably more tactical flexibility than Anwar's coalition management has sometimes allowed.

Who’s the next PM?

The most recent statements by Zahid provide another indication of his political calculations.

On Sept 27, Zahid indicated that BN would leave the coalition government once Parliament is dissolved.

Subsequently, on Nov 10, he argued that dissolving Parliament to obtain a fresh mandate would be preferable to conducting a cabinet reshuffle.

These statements should not be interpreted as an immediate withdrawal of BN's support from Anwar. Rather, they demonstrate that Zahid is already positioning Umno and BN for the next political contest.

The message is straightforward: Umno's participation in the coalition government does not mean that it intends to subordinate its political ambitions to Harapan indefinitely.

This brings us to the most important question surrounding the next general election.

If BN secure sufficient parliamentary support to form the next government, who should become prime minister?

Would Zahid seek the premiership himself? Would he support another senior Umno leader? Or would he prefer to remain the principal power broker behind a different prime minister?

Zahid's political achievements cannot be dismissed. He has brought Umno back from a devastating electoral defeat, strengthened his position within the party and restored its importance in national coalition negotiations.

However, political effectiveness should not automatically translate into suitability for the highest office in the country.

In my assessment, Malaysia has already experienced the consequences of highly personalised political leadership.

We have had a prime minister who governed the country twice and whose political legacy continues to shape our institutions, political culture and national debates.

We cannot afford another administration in which political survival, personal authority and the consolidation of power become more important than institutional accountability, democratic principles and national interests.

Malaysia needs a prime minister who can govern institutions, not simply manage political opponents.

Ultimately, the question is not whether Zahid is politically intelligent. The issue now is whether Malaysia should reward political survival skills with the premiership when the country needs institutional renewal.

And Anwar should also recognise that political cooperation cannot be sustained through accommodation alone.

Harapan must defend its institutional principles, protect the integrity of its coalition and demonstrate that multiracial politics is more than an electoral arrangement.

Ultimately, Malaysia's next political chapter should not become another contest between powerful personalities seeking to outmanoeuvre one another.

We have already experienced enough of that.

The country needs leadership that places national interests above party survival, institutional integrity above personal loyalty, and democratic accountability above political expediency.

GE16 should therefore be more than another opportunity for Umno to reclaim power.

It should be an opportunity for Malaysians to decide what kind of political leadership they want for the next generation. - Mkini

---

R PANEIR SELVAM is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geopolitical matters.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT

Fake approvals, RM1.3m trail: How agents allegedly resold hijacked migrant worker quotas

 

Police have frozen 13 bank accounts after a contractor complained that he paid RM1.3 million to an agent to get migrant workers, but received just a fraction.

The agent in question is the same one that Malaysiakini previously reported had allegedly secured a quota of 1,125 migrant workers using an Orang Asli cooperative’s name and fake details about how much land the cooperative owned.

The contractor, identified here as Shah (not his real name), alleged that the agent, known as Mr G, gave him fake approval documents, delivered only a third of the promised workers, and left most of those who arrived unable to work legally after the quota was blacklisted.

The falsification of documents to secure quotas, which are then traded for cash in this case, shows how the migrant worker quota system is susceptible to abuse, and how intermediaries make money at the expense of others.

Born in Pakistan and now a Malaysian citizen, Shah runs a company with a G7 contractor licence and holds a valid Private Employment Agency (APS) licence under the Human Resources Ministry.

At the end of 2023, he said, his company had projects worth about RM10 million and needed a large migrant workforce, mostly in construction. That was when he met Mr G, who promised to secure quota approvals for the plantation and construction sectors at RM1,800 per worker.

Shah said he knew the lawful processing cost was about RM1,500 per worker, but accepted the higher price because an earlier application of his had been rejected.

He paid an advance of RM780,000 in more than 10 transactions, some in cash.

“In this business, advances and cash payments are very normal,” he said.

Curiously, however, Shah said none of these or future payments went to accounts in Mr G’s name.

Malaysiakini has reviewed bank statements, receipts and messages between the two men that support his account of the payments.

Workers never arrived

Mr G then told him that 300 quotas had been approved, 200 for construction and 100 for plantations. Shah asked for copies of the approval documents and checked them with the Home Ministry.

“After checking with the Home Ministry, I found that the approval documents supplied by Mr G were fake,” he said.

Malaysiakini has confirmed with both the Home and Human Resources Ministries that the documents were fake.

When Shah demanded his money back, he claimed Mr G came back with a different offer: a quota under the name of the Orang Asli’s Koperasi Kijang Mas Negeri Pahang Berhad.

Because Shah held a valid APS licence, he was asked to manage 500 workers from Pakistan who would be sent to work the cooperative’s land.

To offset his advance, Shah agreed to bear every other cost, from approvals and levies to medical examinations and Socso, under the “zero cost” concept for workers.

By his count, the total he paid through the 13 accounts reached RM1.3 million, and Mr G promised his profit would come once the land was cultivated.

Shah said he went with Mr G’s associate, Ms K, to the High Commission of Pakistan, where a binding agreement was signed. He shared the document with Malaysiakini for verification.

The workers, however, never arrived in the numbers promised. Only 169 of the 500 reached Malaysia. Shah claimed he proposed sending 100 of them to the cooperative first, since the quota was meant for its land, but Mr G refused.

Then the quota collapsed.

Under investigation

The Home Ministry blacklisted the cooperative for using fake documents to obtain the approval, and when the first work permit renewals fell due, the remaining workers could not be renewed.

“They could not work legally. I had to use my own money to send them home,” Shah said.

His requests for a refund were met with one excuse after another, and in January 2026, he lodged a police report at the Sentul district police headquarters.

Shah’s lawyer, Azlan Shah, said the Commercial Crime Investigation Department at Bukit Aman later wrote to them in a letter dated Oct 1, 2026, confirming that an investigation paper had been opened under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating.

“The police investigation is still ongoing.

“We have advised our client to take civil action to recover the money, and a letter of demand has been issued," he said.

A Home Ministry spokesperson confirmed that the case is under investigation and that all 13 accounts have been frozen as part of the probe. Shah describes himself as one of the parties cheated in the affair.

The cooperative’s own complaint is being handled in parallel. Its secretary Nazlan Mokhtar lodged a police report at the Travers police station in Brickfields on Jan 19, alleging that the chairperson’s signature on an agreement with Agensi Pekerjaan Uni Jobs Sdn Bhd - a company linked to Mr G - had been forged.

Malaysiakini could not independently verify that allegation.

Malaysiakini has also contacted Mr G and Ms K for comment. - Mkini

Adun Kota Kemuning mahu 47 projek tebatan banjir di Selangor dipercepat

 S Preakas berkata projek dalam Belanjawan Selangor 2027 itu perlu dilaksana segera termasuk percepat proses kelulusan dan reka bentuk.

Taman Sri Muda antara kawasan bawah DUN Kota Kemuning yang sering dilanda banjir. (Gambar Facebook)

PETALING JAYA:

Adun Kota Kemuning, S Preakas menggesa pelaksanaan 47 projek tebatan banjir di Selangor yang diumumkan dalam Belanjawan 2027 negeri itu dipercepat demi kesejahteraan penduduk.

Preakas berkata beliau mengalu-alukan peruntukan RM36.45 juta bagi 47 projek tebatan banjir di Selangor yang diumumkan Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari semalam ketika membentangkan belanjawan negeri itu bagi 2027.

“Bagaimanapun, projek di bawah Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran (JPS) ini perlu disusuli dengan pelaksanaan segera, termasuk mempercepat proses kelulusan dan memulakan reka bentuk projek lebih awal.

S Preakas.

“Bagi keluarga yang terpaksa berjaga malam memerhatikan paras air setiap kali hujan lebat, kemajuan paling bermakna ialah apabila risiko banjir di kawasan mereka benar-benar berkurang,” katanya kepada FMT.

Semalam, Amirudin memberitahu DUN Selangor dana RM36.45 juta itu adalah untuk membiayai 30 projek sambungan dan 17 projek baharu di bawah Rancangan Selangor Kedua (RS-2).

Beliau berkata sebanyak RM3.3 bilion diperuntukan untuk belanjawan 2027 negeri itu dengan RM1.9 bilion atau 57.6% diperuntukkan bagi perbelanjaan mengurus manakala RM1.4 bilion (42.4%) bagi tujuan pembangunan.

Sementara itu, Preakas berkata sebagai wakil rakyat Kota Kemuning, beliau akan terus membawa isu dan keperluan penduduk Taman Sri Muda, Jalan Bukit Kemuning Batu 5 dan Batu 8, Kampung Bukit Lanchong serta Taman Bukit Kemuning kepada kerajaan negeri, JPS dan pihak berkuasa tempatan.

“Saya akan meminta jadual kerja dan kemas kini berkala mengenai penyelenggaraan saliran, kesiapsiagaan pam dan kerja naik taraf yang melibatkan kawasan ini,” katanya. - FMT

Mangsa banjir di Selangor meningkat kepada 1,498 orang

 Bagaimanapun, jumlah mangsa banjir di Perak merekodkan penurunan dengan 265 orang.

Mangsa banjir di Selangor yang ditempatkan di tujuh pusat pemindahan banjir bertambah kepada kepada 1,498 mangsa daripada 402 keluarga pagi ini, berbanding 1,373 mangsa daripada 369 keluarga pada petang semalam. (Gambar Bernama)

KUALA LUMPUR:

Jumlah mangsa banjir di pusat pemindahan sementara (PPS) di Selangor meningkat, manakala di Perak berkurang setakat 8 pagi tadi.

Di Selangor, jumlah mangsa di tujuh PPS di Kuala Selangor bertambah kepada 1,498 mangsa daripada 402 keluarga pagi ini, berbanding 1,373 mangsa daripada 369 keluarga pada petang semalam.

Menurut portal InfoBencana Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM), PPS Sekolah Kebangsaan (SK) Parit Mahang menempatkan 428 mangsa diikuti SK Dato’ Maharaja Lela (393), Sekolah Rendah Agama (SRA) Bukit Kuching (311), Dewan Orang Ramai Bukit Kuching Tengah (123) dan Kafa Integrasi Hidayah Bukit Cherakah (122).

SRA Batu 8 Ijok pula menjadi tempat berlindung bagi 71 mangsa, manakala Dewan Komuniti Penyayang Tanjung Siam menempatkan 50 mangsa.

Sementara itu, di Perak, jumlah mangsa banjir di daerah Hilir Perak berkurang kepada 265 orang daripada 74 keluarga, berbanding 274 orang daripada 79 keluarga yang direkodkan pada petang semalam.

Sekretariat Jawatankuasa Pengurusan Bencana Negeri (JPBN) memaklumkan terdapat 246 mangsa daripada 70 keluarga di PPS Dewan Rumah Rehat Majlis Perbandaran Teluk Intan (MPTI) dan 19 mangsa daripada empat keluarga di PPS Dewan MPTI Langkap.

Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia meramalkan hujan pada sebelah pagi di daerah Larut, Matang dan Selama, Kerian, Manjung, Kuala Kangsar, Hulu Perak dan Bagan Datuk, manakala ribut dan hujan dijangka berlaku pada sebelah petang dan malam di kesemua 12 daerah di Perak. - FMT