BACK TO THE WALL & ANXIOUS TO STAY OUT OF THE SAME JAIL AS NAJIB? HADI CAUGHT TELLING ANOTHER BIG LIE IN PUBLIC: ‘I HAVEN’T LISTENED TO NIK ABDUH RECORDING’ – BUT U.K. COURT DOCUMENTS SHOW HE LIED

PAS leader Hadi Awang has today publicly told questioning media that he would not comment on the contents of the Nik Abduh tape (now acknowledged to be genuine) because he had not listened to it and does not apparently intend to:

“I didn’t watch the video. I didn’t read (about it). Hence I don’t want to comment.”
“Let’s see if it is true or not. (I’ll have to) read it first. There are a lot of things and I’m busy with other matters.”
“It depends on whether I have time. I have a lot of other work. I have no time to listen to things that happened in the past.”
“Whether it is true or not, I have to see first,” [Malaysiakini / Malay Mail]

he said to reporters, who were seeking confirmation about Nik Abduh’s claim that Hadi had given him permission to lie that the audio was a fake.

Say Goodbye To Prostate Issues In 4 Weeks. Just Take This Once Per Day.

Actipotence

 

How To Save Money On Electricity. Read More

Energysaver

Yet, Hadi had submitted a detailed analysis of the content and meaning of the tape to the London court in his response to Sarawak Report’s defence, giving his interpretation of the various confessions by Nik Abduh about PAS receiving money from UMNO on 10-11 occasions, including RM2 million for the Sarawak 2016 elections.

In this court statement the PAS president provided an explanation as to why in his opinion the words did not actually mean that the party had received large sums of money from ‘stupid UMNO’.

What’s more he had told the court in no uncertain terms that he accepted that the recording was indeed true and not a fake.

To have authorised these remarks in this section of his sworn statement to the court Hadi would have had to have listened to the recording (or he must now blame his top London lawyers for submitting a false and unauthorised statement).  So, why all these claims of ignorance now?

Below is the segment in which Hadi went into detail about what Abduh said and why he did not think the words were defamatory (which Nik Abduh had said they were):

The Nik Abduh tape90. As to paragraph 26A(11), it is admitted that a recording of Nik Abduh speaking at a meeting was published on the internet at around this time. Nik Abduh did not during that meeting admit or confess that either he, the Claimant or PAS had been “complicit in corruption” as alleged by the Defendant. During the meeting Nik Abduh discussed the long standing PAS policy described above in paragraph 86*. He referred to charitable donations which had been received in the 1990s by a charitable trust run by Nik Abdul Aziz towards the construction of a religious school and a mosque, and charitable donations which he, Nik Abduh, had received during his time as an MP to provide aid or welfare to his constituents, such as during the Malaysian flood emergency in 2014. His suggestion that the Claimant had received similar donations was false. Nothing that he said was, was intended as, or can properly be construed as an admission, let alone evidence, of the corruption which the words complained of alleged against the Claimant and PAS [underline added].

Expand text

This new line from Hadi continues a pattern in this case of saying one thing in Malaysia and another to the London court. The documents are there for all to see and they do not match his public remarks.All this makes it ever clearer by the day for those who didn’t know the details about the case why Hadi and his colleagues in PAS decided to pull the plug before they had to answer questions in the witness box.

– http://www.sarawakreport.org/