`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!

 



 


16 SEPTEMBER 2026

Saturday, May 31, 2025

Has Malaysia ever seen ministers resign when they lose support?

 


 Lately, politics has been quite boring to follow or comment on. It’s not like nothing is happening, everything is just operational. I guess this isn’t a bad thing because if there isn’t much attention given to politics, then it means all is going smoothly, and well, operational.

Of course, it could also mean that they cover up well or have good public relations skills. But let’s assume the best for the moment.

When the PKR election results came out recently, it caught everyone’s attention because some bigwigs were contesting against each other, with the biggest wigs being Nurul Izzah Anwar and Rafizi Ramli.

Coming into the election, Rafizi was the incumbent of the second-highest post in the party - deputy president. He was also the economy minister.

ADS

Nurul Izzah, on the other hand, had lost in the last general election. She held no government post and was a vice-president in the party. She is also the daughter of the party president, Anwar Ibrahim.

As we all know, the two bigwigs duked it out, and Rafizi (above, left) lost his position, and Nurul Izzah seems to have come out of her political cold storage and is in the limelight again.

Another bigwig who lost is Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, who was vice-president in the party and also the natural resources and environmental sustainability minister.

He had earlier lost his position as Setiawangsa division chief to comedian and film director Afdlin Shauki. Nik Nazmi (above, right) appealed the outcome, but the results were upheld.

Newly elected PKR deputy president Nurul Izzah Anwar

History in the making

Both Rafizi and Nik Nazmi tendered their resignations as ministers. This is something Malaysians are not used to - cabinet ministers resigning when they no longer garner the support.

They cited that they were appointed as ministers based on their previous positions in the party. It was only right that they resign, seeing that they no longer held those positions after the party election.

This is history in the making because although there have been ministers who lost their place in cabinet because of losing their party positions, none of them had ever resigned willingly and instead, were dropped by the prime minister during cabinet reshuffles.

One can assume that they still wanted to hold on to their ministerial posts but just couldn’t and were told to leave.

The fact that we have politicians who are willing to do what Rafizi and Nik Nazmi did is progressive in Malaysian politics. This is in line with how, after the 2018 general election, when Pakatan Harapan won the government, the country can now see the possibility of the people choosing and changing the administration that they wanted to govern their country.

It shows that there can no longer be an authoritarian administration that will try to hold on to power as long as they can, even when they don’t have the support of the majority of the people anymore.

Of course, seeing that 2018 was only seven years ago, we are still in our infancy as far as progressiveness in our politics is concerned, but at least we are heading in the right direction.

ADS

However, it is a little bit disappointing to see progressive politicians like Rafizi and Nik Nazmi go. These two are scandal-free and are performing ministers, more so Nik Nazmi, who has been doing a good job with his portfolio.

Rafizi, although a bit muted during his time as minister, is someone we all know as being brave and vocal when it comes to criticising his party if they stray from their main objective of reform.

On the other hand, many observers say that this is the best opportunity for these two, more so Rafizi, to better solidify his position as a top politician and national leader.

Being out of the cabinet and also the party leadership structure means that they can become good and strong backbenchers, which could win them more support among the grassroots to make an even stronger comeback.

Wait and see

This is similar to Nurul Izzah, who is now under pressure to perform. After she lost in the last general election, she quietly rebuilt her standing and is now back in the political limelight. Of course, there is criticism of cronyism and family lineage, so how she (and her father) handles this and performs is going to be key in silencing these critics.

This is something we will have to wait and see, and with the current progressiveness in politics, I am not too worried because it means that we have a society that is aware and realises that the people have a voice and voting power.

If more politicians are like Rafizi and Nik Nazmi, it also means we have politicians who are willing to relinquish power when they lose and not try to hang on with wrinkled claws.

Again, we are still far from being a perfect democracy with a perfect political system, but we are heading in the right direction. Do we ever want to go back to a time prior to 2018, when there was never a change in government? I do not think so. I want to be confident and secure knowing that people can always determine their government.

With that said, it means that our society and people must not rest on our laurels and be lulled into a sense of blissful comfort. We must always be vigilant and observant of our elected leaders and bring into power those who have integrity, ethics and responsibility.

No matter how progressive and improved we become, we must try to maintain it and make it better. - Mkini


ZAN AZLEE is a writer, documentary filmmaker, journalist and academic. Visit fatbidin.com to view his work.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT.

Sabah graft scandal: PM's 'perception' speech a joke, says Latheefa

Lawyer Latheefa Koya has lambasted Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for regarding the alleged Sabah corruption scandal as a political perception.

Speaking at a forum today, the former MACC chief commissioner said videos showed several Sabah state leaders purportedly discussing bribes, and they are not mere perception.

"What perception was he talking about? This is hard evidence.

"Videos depicting people who are confessing to an action of corruption are not perception, it's hard evidence

"So, what is the message he's giving to the (MACC) chief commissioner? It's almost a joke. It's (the scandal) not perception," she said at a forum organised by the Universiti Malaya Law Faculty entitled “Corruption and Constitutional Democracy: A call for integrity”.

Latheefa (above), who is also the lawyer representing the whistleblower behind the scandal videos, is one of the forum’s panellists.

She was responding to Anwar's speech during an event in Sabah yesterday, where the prime minister defended MACC's handling of the case, which the anti-graft agency had been accused of inaction.

"The allegation is that we are covering it up, that’s a perception - raised especially in urban areas - as though there’s an effort to cover up acts of corruption and wrongdoing," Anwar reportedly said.

According to the prime minister, MACC had to investigate the videos to ensure their authenticity, especially during the era of artificial intelligence.

‘Another joke’

To this, Latheefa chided Anwar's notion that the videos could have been fabricated.

Saying that the remarks were "another joke", the lawyer pointed out that one of the state assemblypersons implicated in the scandal had admitted that it was him in the leaked video.

ADS

"He said that was him, but he denies what he said was tantamount to bribery. He said it could be a political donation, there's no bribery element in the video.

"But how is it that someone admitted to the video, but you have the top leader suggesting that we have to be very careful when we investigate.

"Why? Why do we need to be careful? Is it because the Sabah election is happening?

"Is it because the person being investigated or targeted holds a very high position?" asked Latheefa.

She also pondered the question of what the difference is between the Anwar-led administration and Najib Abdul Razak’s BN government, whom she said had abused their powers to avoid investigation and charges in the 1MDB scandal. - Mkini

Students claim govt interfering in forum but Adam Adli, UM deny

 


The organiser of a law event at Universiti Malaya (UM) has denied allegations that a student was removed from being a forum co-panellist due to pressure from Youth and Sports Deputy Minister Adam Adli and Miri MP Chiew Choon Man.

ADS

This followed a statement by Liga Mahasiswa Malaysia that demanded the two MPs issue a public apology to student activist Alyaah Hani Anuar over the alleged government interference.

Adam and Chiew, who were co-panellists at the forum discussing freedom of expression held at the university’s Law Faculty earlier today, have refuted the claims.

According to UM Consti Team advisor Sheila Ramalingam, the decision not to include Hani in the session was to ensure all panellists have similar standing.

Student activist Alyaah Hani Anuar

This was because they also had constitutional expert Shad Saleem Faruqi, who is an emeritus professor, as a co-panellist.

“If I understand correctly, she was asked to be a panellist yesterday because there were other people (invited panellists) who dropped out, so we were looking for replacements, and they (organising committee members) went and looked at her.

“(But) when they came to me, I said there shouldn’t be any students on the panel.

“Not because she’s a student, but because the panellists all should be of the same standing. So you can’t have a professor emeritus, Professor Shad with a student, you know, ‘tak ngam’ (not suitable),” said Sheila.

The lecturer was speaking to Malaysiakini when met after the panel discussion session titled “Unmute the Nation: The Constitution’s Promise of Freedom”.

An outspoken student-activist, Hani has taken the government to task over potential plans to reinstate a travel ban on National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) loan defaulters.

On March 13, the third-year law student highlighted how recommendations for stricter approaches to hold defaulters accountable often come from individuals with privileged backgrounds “detached from grassroots realities”.

‘Cowardly act’

Earlier today, Liga Mahasiswa in a statement claimed the two PKR MPs requested the organiser to exclude Hani from the panel if they wanted them to attend their event.

ADS

“To make it worse, there was also a request for Hani not to be anywhere near the forum venue.

“This is not only a form of silencing students’ voices, but also a cowardly act that shows fear of differences in opinion,” the group said.

Youth and Sports Deputy Minister Adam Adli

When contacted, Hani, who is the Liga Mahasiswa UM president, said she received an invitation to be an emcee on May 10.

Due to a shortage of panellists, she said the organiser invited her yesterday to be a co-panellist with Shad, Adam, and Chiew, to which she agreed.

However, at 6pm, the organising committee contacted her again to rescind the invitation.

“They informed me that Adam was having a second thought about attending the forum after his PA (personal assistant) saw my name on the list.

“Then at 11.45pm, I received another call from the committee, where they apologised for having to exclude me from being a panellist and emcee at the forum.

“I was informed that the decision was made based on a request from Adam and Chiew’s side, who do not want me to be either a panellist, emcee, or even be seen at the event,” the activist claimed.

‘Panellists changing many times’

In response to this, Adam and Chiew both claimed this was untrue.

“It’s not true, I have never heard such a problem.

“In fact, from what I know, I have agreed to be a panellist much earlier. Only that the list of panellists had been changing many times, until the 11th hour, they could not confirm the panel.

“So I told them that since I am travelling from Malacca for this session, they need to confirm the panellists, if not, it would be hard for me to arrange my schedule,” Adam said.

Similarly, Chiew said it’s not true and he has no problem having a dialogue with any student. - Mkini