A man was arrested over alleged criminal intimidation of the Perlis mufti, Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin, on a Facebook page. The police have confirmed this. A Hindu group that was vociferous in their criticism of both Asri and Indian preacher Zakir Naik has distanced themselves from this ‘intimidation’, saying that they do not condone such acts.
While the police were quick to act on this criminal intimidation, they have been silent when Asri or Zakir Naik allegedly ridiculed or humiliated Hinduism. Despite the number of police reports, the police remain reluctant to act on these two individuals, for reasons best known to the police themselves.
If similar attacks had been made against the dominant religion, I am sure the police would have pounced and arrested the individuals concerned. My question is, why did the police allow these alleged acts of humiliation against Hindus to continue in the country? Why did the police not act on the numerous police reports made both against Asri or Zakir Naik?
I do not understand why the police, being the guardians of public safety and security, would allow sensitive things to fester for awhile without taking any action. Hundreds of police reports have been made against Asri, but I doubt that the police even took a statement from him. By not taking any action, the police might have inadvertently given the green light for Asri to continue making alleged insulting remarks about Hinduism or, for that matter, any other faiths other than Islam.
But all of a sudden, when someone posted a threat against Asri in a Facebook page, the police sprung to action by arresting the person. Surely, if the police had cautioned Asri or Zakir Naik, things would have been different. Criminal intimidation is wrong and the police should take action if anyone breaks the law regarding public safety or security. But surely, Asri and Zakir Naik might have crossed the threshold of what is permissible and what is not many times.
Malaysia is armed to the teeth when it comes to laws to deal with threats to public order and security. We have the infamous Sedition Act that seems to be focused only the activities of the opposition politicians. But why this act is not invoked on the likes of Zakir Naik and Asri is unclear.
Even our inspector-general of police, Khalid Abu Bakar, other than saying that Zakir Naik had not broken any laws in the country, only told the Hindu groups not to advise the police about the management of public security.
While Khalid defended the speeches of Zakir Naik, he has yet to say anything about Asri. Police inaction on Zakir Naik and Asri gives rise to a strange feeling that some individuals in the country can say anything they want and get away with impunity. It is this impunity that allows them to repeat their alleged insults and injure members of certain minority communities.
When the authorities take no action against those who spread and perpetuate religious hatred, the problem is allowed to fester.
I am sure I do not need to educate the Malaysian police about what they should and should not do.
P RAMASAMY is Deputy Chief Minister II of Penang and the state assemblyperson for Perai.- Mkini
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.