After Airbus judgement, do Malaysians still wish to be seen in London?
Sieving through the news reports, and social media comments, the public at large failed to appreciate that their celebrated entrepreneurs created another milestone of achievement that “Now, everyone could not have done”.
The spirit of “Malaysia Boleh” got two Malaysians linked to AirAsia registered in a London court together with Airbus, a world renown multinational and getting global coverage. It is an unthinkable branding strategy.Being implicated in the judgement for corruption against Airbus. the two decision makers for the large orders for planes for AirAsia and AirAsia X are far from acquited from allegations of bribe.
The highly etiquette and good mannered British who values moral and ethics, adherence to integrity and accountability, and generally about being proper will not look at Malaysians in the same light again.
Legally, the e-mail evidence linked between the plane order to sponsorship into Caterham F1 team privately owned by Tan Sri Tony Fernandez and Dato Kamaruddin Meranun, which was highlighted by a fervent detractor of AirAsia, Wee Choo Keong in his blog here.
Caterham F1 venture was meant to raise the Airasia brand and get social media viral to the Gen Y market. Instead, the judgement put Malaysia on the map of shame.
It may not matter to the penny pinching Malaysian travelers. But to the well-heeled where London is their second hometown, “Now, everyone are smeared” by the judgement.
The highly etiquette and good mannered British who values moral and ethics, adherence to integrity and accountability, and generally about being proper will not look at Malaysians in the same light again.
OFF-SET?
RELATED STORIES:
Umno leaders rap Mukhriz for being ashamed to call himself Malaysian
Najib on Mukhriz: Let’s put him into the sea
Mukhriz hits back over ‘Bruneian citizen’ report, insists he was misquoted
Never mind the probe for corruption and money laundering by authorities of India, the Edge Online reported yesterday that Tan Sri Tony Fernandez and Dato Kamaruddin Meranun names cropped up before in a London court on similar suspicion in 2017.
The reaction and no reaction by Prime Minister, MACC, even AirAsia and National Governance, Integrity and Anti-Corruption Centre (NGIAC) are not dissociating Malaysia and Malaysians from rampant practises of corruption, kickback and bribery.
After losing some RM1.5 billion loss in market capitalisation, the share prices of AirAsia recovered yesterday following statement by Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir who came to the defense of the 11 years in a row for world’s best low cost carrier with the offset line.
However, the diversionary denial is not convincing. Gunasegaran in Focus Malaysia explained offset do not involve cash into private companies or account but are in the form of programs and contributions for benefit of industry and public.
Otherwise, SRC and 1MDB are also offset programs and all charges against Dato Najib should be dropped.
In the UK, Mahathir had a reputation of being reported by media in the 1990s as Mr 10% and the Pergau dam deal remain ettched in public records.
The UK judgement is a criminal prosecution against the company. It could proceed further to investigate and subsequently prosecute individuals worldwide involved in the company, recipients of the bribe and those abetting the crime.
It was reported yesterday that Sri Lanka immediately arrested the airline chief implicated in the claim of accepting bribe in the Airbus UK judgement. Malaysia have not acted so.
MACC’s Chief Commissioner have been quiet since her last statement over the weekend.
Latheefa Koya, who may be expected to find a way out for her fellow Malaysian Indian but consciously maybe aware that it warrants an investigation, thus rely on PM to do her follow-up statement.
COVER-UPS?
It is understandable for Tony and Kamaruddin to decisively act to immediately withdraw themselves from any executive role for two months.
In crisis management, it is textbook public relation and considered commendable for Malaysians to do so. However, it still fall short and mere pulling over public eyes.
The two remained the majority shareholders and members of the Board of Directors, thus still wielding much power. More so, the enquiry will be done internally by Air Asia.
Will anyone dare to incriminate the taukehs, and major shareholders with the 54 year old MCE holder an former ground operation executive, Tharumalingam s/o Kanalingam acting as CEO who naturally is more likely to act on instruction than given any independence to act?
The camaraderie between sub-continent rooted Malaysians to cover each other is astounding.
Minority Shareholders’ Watchdog Group (MSWG) CEO Devadesan Evanson urged the two to step down from the BOD pending investigations.
His call is still short of the level of integrity and accountability one could expect from an independent group with no protocol from any formal relationship with authorities abroad. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Devadeson could question also as to why no Airbus executive are asked to go on gardening leave pending investigation. Even after Airbus paid for the US$4 billion fines, no Airbus executive is sacked!
Instead of diverting attention to current MCMC Chairman, Al-Ishsal who used to be employed with MAS and subsequently AirAsia, and CEO of Caterham Bikes, no mention was made of Riad Asmat.
Riad is the current AirAsia Group CEO and son of BOD member, Tan Sri Asmat Kamaluddin who was the long serving KSU to Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz at MITI and now Air Asia X Chairman.
He was Group CEO for Carterham for two years untill around 2013 or early 2014. He should be watering his garden daily, shouldn’t he?
This issue has enormous implication to this publically owned company.
It is faced with the double wham of an industry in which the Wuhan orginated CoronaVirus has caused Cathay Pacifics asked 27,000 staff to take three weeks unpaid leave.
And now the alleged bribery scandal that already affected its market capitalisation. A market rebound does not erase what was commited.
TRANPARENCY? INTEGRITY? GOVERNANCE?
If MACC is what MACC is, where are voices in the likes of Dato Akhbar Satar, the former Transparency International Malasia President?
He was then enthralled with the Corruption Perception Index and used it to the hilt to smear Najib’s administration, but recently said not to “syok sangat” with the seemingly favourable CPI 2019 statistics.
Yet, no comment on the more damaging Airbus-Airasia alleged bribery from the man said to be a protege of Tan Sri Abu Kassim Mohamed.
No comment too from the Director General for NGIAC.
He claimed the war on corruption is coming together, which is basically the conceptual plan he put together during his hiatus at UiTM, but proposal rejected by the University as not feasible.
None of the promises for eradication corruption in the PH Manifesto is carried out by Abu Kassim.
Someone should dig up on how former SIRIM executive, Nor’afiza Saim was appointed as CEO of Integrity Institute of Malaysia despite being rejected by the Board of Trustee as unqualified for the post.
Abu may have had a hand to place her as his person to replace the earlier CEO, who was his man too and now his Deputy.
NGIAC is more concerned to place their people everywhere like any PTD man than seriously addressing governance, integrity and corruption.
By the attitude displayed, the Airbus judgement looks likely to be ignored and Malaysians should not embarass themselves by showing their face in London.
-http://anotherbrickinwall.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.