The matter will proceed to a four-day hearing in the Kuala Lumpur High Court starting May 24, 2027.

High Court Justice Roslan Nor noted that the Bar, in its affidavit, could not demonstrate a legal interest in the case.
The plaintiff, Haniff Khatri Abdulla, objected to the Bar being added as a defendant.
His lawyer, Aidil Khalid, said the Bar could still participate in the case as amicus curiae (friend of the court) or hold a watching brief.
Last year, Haniff filed a writ of summons and statement of claim naming the government as the sole defendant in the lawsuit.
Haniff said the suit was based on Article 160B of the Federal Constitution, which provides that once the constitution is translated into the national language, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may prescribe the national language text as the authoritative version.
“After that, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the national language and English text, the national language text shall prevail,” he said.
Although the king launched the BM version of the constitution on Sept 29, 2003, Haniff said the government had yet to make it the authoritative version.
He claimed this was a breach of the government’s constitutional duty to ensure it took the necessary steps to uphold and dignify the national language.
Roslan scheduled a four-day hearing of the matter from May 24, 2027.
In today’s proceeding, lawyers Christopher Leong, Abdul Rashid Ismail, and Jacquiline Albert appeared for the Bar, while senior federal counsel Azza Azmi represented the government. - FMT

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.