`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


Tuesday, May 7, 2019

NAJIB TRIAL - Day 14: Loan approval not rushed - witness



The criminal trial of former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak involving the alleged misappropriation of funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd enters its 14th day today at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur.
Malaysiakini brings you live reports of the proceedings.

Summary of Najib’s SRC RM42 million case

Najib is facing 7 charges relating to RM42m involving SRC International, a former 1MDB subsidiary.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Loan approval not rushed, says KWAP ex-officer
  • Witness upset about being cut off by defence counsel
  • Witness: KWAP would've rejected SRC loan bid if given a choice
  • Laughter in court as witness is asked to identify SRC ex-director
  • Banker confirms witness statement based on bank documents

Court breaks for lunch
1pm - The court is taking a half-hour break for lunch. 

Loan approval not rushed, says KWAP ex-officer
12.19pm - Former Retirement Fund Inc (KWAP) assistant vice-president (Fixed Income Department) Amirul Imran Ahmat tells the court that the fund was not rushed into approving SRC International's application for a RM3.95 billion loan.
During cross-examination, the witness explained that he had prepared a paper for KWAP's investment panel in July 2011 regarding SRC's loan. 
Harvinderjit: If there had been a rush to approve the loan, they could have approved it straightaway, but they did not.
Amirul: Yes.
Harvinderjit: After deferring (on the loan application), then they decided (to approve the loan later)?
Amirul: Yes.
Yesterday, when examined by the prosecution, the former KWAP officer had testified that he was under pressure and felt rushed when dealing with the SRC International loan application.

Witness upset that defence counsel cut him off
12.10pm - A minor argument ensues between defence counsel Harvinderjit Singh and witness Amirul Imran Ahmat over a proposal paper to approve an RM1 billion loan to SRC International.
Amirul testified that he had been instructed by the director of KWAP's Fixed Income Department to prepare a proposal paper for KWAP to loan SRC RM1 billion, after the fund received the latter's request for an RM3.95 billion loan.  
Harvinderjit repeatedly puts to the former KWAP officer that the RM1 billion loan was a recommendation made by KWAP's Fixed Income Department.
However, Amirul denies the lawyer’s claim, saying the paper was only prepared for KWAP's investment panel to "deliberate and consider".
He told the court that if the paper were indeed a recommendation, it would have included relevant wording to that effect.
When Harvinderjit tried to press him again, Amirul interjected, telling Harvinderjit to allow him to respond.
"No, you asked me a question, let me answer," said Amirul.
The lawyer, however, did not back down and instead rephrased his claim by asking whether the RM1 billion loan was a recommendation made by KWAP's Fixed Income Department, to which Amirul replies, "No".

Witness: KWAP would've rejected SRC loan bid if given a choice
12pm - 29th witness Amirul Imran Ahmat testifies that the Retirement Fund Inc's (KWAP) investment panel would have rejected the proposed loan of RM3.95 billion to SRC International, if it had a choice.
The former KWAP officer says this during cross-examination by Najib's lawyer Harvinderjit Singh.
However, when pressed by Harvinderjit, he clarifies this is his personal opinion and that he cannot speak on behalf of the investment panel.
Harvinderjit: You know that the investment panel did not approve the paper straight away?
Amirul: They would have rejected it if they had a choice. It was deferred, not rejected (in the end).
Harvinderjit: You cannot speak on behalf of the investment panel.
Amirul: Yes.
Harvinderjit: All that you are saying on that they would have rejected it is your personal opinion on the matter.
Amirul: Yes.

Laughter in court as witness is asked to identify SRC ex-director
11.08am - A light moment pierces the normally serious proceedings when DPP Ishak Mohd Yusoff asks 29th witness Amirul Imran Ahmat (below) to identify former SRC International director Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil.
It is understood that Nik Faisal has not been successfully located by the authorities so far.
Chuckles can be heard from the public gallery when a photo of Nik Faisal is tendered to the witness, who is a former Retirement Fund Inc (KWAP) officer.
Ishak: Can you identify Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil?
Amirul: Yes.
Ishak: Take a look at the picture (laughter ensues in background).
Amirul: Yes (points to the picture).

Banker confirms witness statement based on bank documents
11.00am - The hearing starts with defence counsel Farhan Read continuing his cross-examination of the prosecution's 30th witness, Norhayati Mohd Yunus (below), who is the manager of Affin Bank's branch at The Curve, Petaling Jaya.
The cross-examination, however, only lasts for about a minute, with Farhan asking Norhayati to confirm whether her witness statement was based on available bank documents.
To this, Norhayati replies in the affirmative, before she is released.
The 29th witness, former Retirement Fund Inc (KWAP) officer Amirul Imran Ahmat, is then called back to the stand.

Najib enters dock
10.58am - Former premier Najib Abdul Razak enters the dock as judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali comes into the courtroom to begin the hearing.

10.50am - Former premier Najib Abdul Razak's lead counsel Muhammad Shafee Abdullah enters the courtroom and takes a seat at the front to await the beginning of proceedings in the accused's SRC International trial.
The veteran lawyer had arrived after addressing a separate legal matter at the Court of Appeal earlier this morning.
The matter concerned Najib's appeal to disqualify former Federal Court judge Gopal Sri Ram from leading the prosecution in the accused's 1MDB trial.
It was reported earlier this morning that the Court of Appeal dismissed Najib's appeal, thus allowing Sri Ram to continue being part of the prosecution in the 1MDB trial. 

10.26am - Najib's defence counsel Harvinderjit Singh is seen entering court with other members of the defence team.
The lawyer is conferring with fellow defence lawyers as members of the prosecution also begin filling in the front seats to await the resumption of proceedings.
Yesterday, lead defence counsel Muhammad Shafee Abdullah informed judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali that Harvinderjit could not attend proceedings as he was down with food poisoning.

10am - Ex-premier Najib and his defence attorney Muhammad Shafee Abdullah have yet to arrive, as they are attending a separate court matter before the Court of Appeal at the Palace of Justice at Putrajaya at 9am this morning. This trial is due to resume at 10am but is likely to start later.

As Najib Abdul Razak's trial over alleged misappropriation of RM42 million of SRC International Sdn Bhd's funds enter its 14th day today, the former premier's defence team is set to further grill the 30th witness, Affin Bank The Curve branch manager Norhayati Mohd Yunus, over transactions involving Ihsan Perdana's accounts at the commercial bank.
It began yesterday afternoon when the accused's defence counsel Farhan Read raised the issue of Mail Global Resources Sdn Bhd purportedly receiving RM35 million from Ihsan Perdana's account via seven cheques dated Jan 13, 2015.
The lawyer had cross-examined the 30th witness over the extent of her knowledge of the transaction, especially on whether she was investigated over it before or after the 13th General Elections in 2013.
She had then testified that neither the MACC nor Bank Negara had taken her statement over the transaction, which she admitted to being able to recall having taken place.
To what extent Mail Global Resources is involved in the case will be a point of interest, because PKR's Rafizi Ramli had, as far back as 2017 via his blog, alleged that Ihsan Perdana had issued the same number of cheques for the same total of RM35 million to Mail Global Resources on the same date of Jan 13, 2015.
Yesterday, Najib's lead counsel Muhammad Shafee Abdullah said that the defence will implement a cross-examination method that seek to determine whether some witnesses had been persuaded to change their testimony after GE13.
During examination-in-chief by the prosecution yesterday, former Retirement Fund Incorporated (KWAP) officer Amirul Imran Ahmat testified that Najib had signed the federal government's guarantee for an additional RM2 billion loan from KWAP to SRC International.
The 29th witness said that Najib signed the document in 2012, in his capacity as then prime minister and finance minister.
Amirul said that SRC International had received a total RM4 billion in loans from KWAP in two tranches between Aug 2011 and March 2012, in what he testified was the largest loan ever given out by KWAP.
At that time, SRC International was a subsidiary of 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB). It was transferred to Finance Ministry Incorporated in 2012, after facing problems.
Najib was then the chairperson of the 1MDB's board of advisors and, according to the company's constitution, the final authority on board member appointments, including that of SRC International.
Amirul is subject to being called back to the witness stand to be cross-examined by the defence team, as yesterday the cross-examination could not be carried out due to Najib's counsel Harvinderjit Singh unable to attend proceedings due to being down with food poisoning.
Today's Najib's SRC International hearing before Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali is expected to start later at 10am rather than the usual set time of 9am, due to Najib and Shafee needing to attend a separate court matter before the Court of Appeal at the Palace of Justice at Putrajaya at 9am this morning.
The Court of Appeal matter is a decision on Najib's appeal to disqualify former federal court judge Gopal Sri Ram from being part of the prosecution in the accused's separate 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) trial, set to be heard before Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah on Aug 19. - Mkini

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.