IN THE END, WHAT THE HELL HAVE MALAYSIANS GOT FOR VOTING IN PAKATAN – A MACHIAVELLI MAHATHIR & RETURN TO CRONYISM? GOOD DEAL?

Return To Cronyism ?? Habis Tuan Tuan Yang Haprak Dapat Apa?

Letter  A return to the cronyism complex
Yusri Abd Rahman  |  Published: 2 Sep 2019

LETTER | On Aug 29, the shares of Opcom Holdings Bhd, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of fibre optic cables and cable-related products, rose 41.11 percent in a day. 

 

The reason?

 

The Pakatan Harapan government had approved the RM21.6 billion National Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan.

 

There is no doubt that the fiberisation of Malaysia is sorely needed – and the large amount of money that has been committed thus far is a clear sign that at least in Pakatan Harapan’s government, at least one minister is doing his best to fulfil his portfolio.

 

This is not the first time that Opcom has had such good fortune, especially under a Mahathir-led government. 

 

Just four days after (Mahathir) was sworn in as Prime Minister, Opcom Cables was awarded an RM11.16 million contract by Telekom Malaysia. 

 

Mokhzani Mahathir was the chairperson and CEO of Opcom Cables at that time and his brother, Mukhriz (Opcom’s co-founder), was the largest shareholder until he turned his shares over to his wife before entering politics.

 

A few months later, a letter of appointment that addressed Petron Fuel International Bhd as one of the fuel suppliers for government vehicles went viral on social media. 

 

Another of Mahathir’s sons, Mirzan, is a director of Philippine-based Petron Corporation, which owns Petron Malaysia.

 

In a letter that went viral in 2018 by a Sebastian Loh, he warned that Mahathir’s cronyism is far worse than Najib’s corruption. I would argue that Najib’s corruption could not have existed if not for Mahathir. 

 

After all it was opposition (now Mahathir ally) leader Lim Kit Siang who stated that, that it was during the former’s 22-year tenure as prime minister that Malaysia first began to “rot,” thanks to corruption and rampant power abuse.

 

He pointed out that it was Mahathir who had “single-handedly destroyed the independence, impartiality and professionalism not only of the judiciary, but also of other important national institutions like the police, the Election Commission, the anti-corruption agency, and the civil service”.

 

During Mahathir’s first tenure as prime minister, he had commissioned three main Umno officials to focus their attention to build “bumiputera capitalists”. 

 

The three were Mahathir himself, Daim Zainuddin (who was finance minister during two phases of Mahathir’s term) and Anwar Ibrahim, who, before his downfall in September 1998, was second in power after Mahathir. All three had their respective corporate connections.

 

Their creations included the privatisation of public services included multi-billion projects such as the North-South Highway, water and sewerage, the Bakun Dam, Light Rail Transit System and the National Train Service (KTM). 

 

The benefits of these schemes evaded the average Malaysian – the only beneficiaries being companies that were linked to the favoured. 

 

These companies were also often given bailouts and “preferred financing” when they invariably failed. 

 

One simply has to look at the sordid state of our infrastructure to see what at the compromised institutional design and regulatory enforcement of the Mahathir-era has given Malaysia. 

 

Judging from recent developments, it was wishful thinking to even consider that Mahathir’s return to office would be anything different. 

 

Some truths still remain – the closer an individual is to Mahathir, economic prosperity is almost sure to follow. 

 

It is no secret that Mahathir generously spreads the wealth around his close circle and friends. After all, companies linked to his family often secures GLC tenders, better financing, government bailouts and more. 

 

Indeed his “stepsons”, Economic Affairs Minister Mohamed Azmin Ali and Youth Minister Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman have been handsomely rewarded both in terms of position and in political security. 

 

After all, it was Mahathir who proved to be Azmin’s most powerful defender when the latter was confronted with a homosexual video scandal earlier this year. 

 

This is on top of his appointment in the Economic Ministry, which now oversees many of Malaysia’s most powerful GLCs (where Azmin also serves on the boards of directors). 

 

Take a clean good look at how Syed Saddiq successfully lobbied for Gojek, a foreign company to operate in the country – despite statements by Transport Minister Anthony Loke that motorcycle ridesharing was unsuitable for the country. 

 

In fact, it seems that even in the aftermath of this announcement, Loke will still play second fiddle to Syed Saddiq, as it was later announced that the regulatory guidelines for motorcycle ride-sharing will be co-authored by the Transport Ministry and the Youth and Sports Ministry.

 

The greatest tragedy of all is that for the average Malaysia it is not the presence of corruption that is the problem – but it is the way that Mahathir uses corruption to advance his own agenda and expand his influence. 

 

Let’s not kid ourselves, there can be no Malaysia Baru without a renewed commitment by Pakatan Harapan towards the ideals of egalitarianism and transparency. 

I fear so long that as long as Mahathir still remains, we may never see it.

My comments : 

Ok-lah ini bisnes jual kabel. Fibre optic cable. Orang yang terlibat bisnes jual kabel ini mesti mempunyai kabel yang besar. Kalau tak ada kabel yang besar macam mana nak buat  ‘connection’?

Macam tuan-tuan saudara Melayu yang daripada golongan haprak biasa.
Tuan tuan dapat apa?  
Tuan-tuan ada kabel ke? 
Atau dawai karat?

Sekarang sudah dekat jam lima petang (5 pm). Time to go home. 

Ada cukup minyak tak dalam kereta MyVi atau dalam kereta Proton tuan-tuan? 

Kalau kena bayar tol, tuan-tuan sudah ‘semak baki nilai kad Touch and Go‘ tak?

Yang saya selalu nampak, queue di lorong Touch and Go panjang-panjang sekali. 

Queue di lorong Smart Tag pula jauh lebih singkat.

Tuan-tuan perasan tak : 

• Yang tunggu berderet di lorong Touch and Go itu paling ramai sekali orang Melayu juga. 
• Yang masuk kut lorong Smart Tag itu ramai bukan Melayu pula. 

Especially di pintu tol masuk Putrajaya.  
Pusat “naik haji” setiap pagi bagi beribu penjawat awam yang majoriti besarnya adalah Melayu. 

Pada waktu rush hour pagi, panjangnya queue di lorong Touch N Go di Tol Putrajaya boleh hampiri satu kilometer.  Lorong Smart Tag pula tak ada kereta pun. 

Apa sebabnya dan apa bezanya?

Bezanya adalah RM130.  Itulah harga alat Smart Tag itu. 

Maksudnya nak beli Smart Tag RM130 pun ramai penjawat awam tak cukup duit. 

Guna pakai Touch and Go saja lah.

 This is the real situation in the country.

So queue lah beramai-ramai di lorong Touch and Go.

 Tuan-tuan rasa kalaulah tuan-tuan pun ada kabel besar, boleh niaga ‘fibre optic cable’ beratusan juta ringgit, maka boleh tak tuan-tuan pun mampu beli alat Smart Tag RM130 itu ? Dan tak payah lagi queue di lorong Touch N Go saja setiap pagi?

 Orang kaya, orang ternama, orang berpengaruh dapat kontrak Kerajaan berpuluh juta dan beratus juta Ringgit.

 Apa maksudnya kontrak kerajaan? 

Kontrak kerajaan maksudnya IT IS YOUR MONEY.

 Tuan-tuan punya duit. 

Tuan-tuan yang ‘bayar’ duit kepada mereka untuk mereka jadi kaya.

Remember this when you queue up at the lorong Touch N Go in Putrajaya tomorrow.

– http://syedsoutsidethebox.blogspot.com