https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/national/does-pharmaniaga-hold-a-monopoly-over-healthcare-deputy-health-minister-explains/ar-AAH6dYU?ocid=spartanntp
1. Finance Minister LIM Guan Eng said the following :
Lim’s remarks on Pharmaniaga monopoly
cast spotlight on drug concessionaire
following review of other similar cartels
Lim announced govt re-looking existing contract with Pharmaniaga
expressed concerns about effects of monopoly on public healthcare cost
Lim said monopoly costing govt more than RM1.1b yearly
govt allocated RM193.6b between 2010 - 2018 for healthcare services
said public health system could spend more efficiently
costs can be addressed if MoH introduces healthy competition to drugs supply
Lim called on MoH to carry reforms to reduce expenditure
and delivery of more efficient healthcare services
2. Deputy Health Minister Dr Lee Boon Chye said something else:
Pharmaniaga only responsible for logistics of supplying drugs to govt
rather than the supply itself.
Dr Lee explained Pharmaniaga distributes medicine
in Approved Products Purchase List (APPL)
purchase of drugs under MoH rather than Pharmaniaga
Pharmaniaga concession for distribution of APPL drugs to MoH facilities
Under agreement, Pharmaniaga provides logistics for APPL drugs only
includes collection, storage, distribution based on standard criteria, KPI
and earns a fixed percentage mark-up over the purchase prices
APPL drugs (RM1.1b in 2017, RM1.2b in 2018) purchased via tender board
headed by MoH and not Pharmaniaga,” he stressed
Dr Lee clarified Pharmaniaga not sole logistic solution for drugs for MoH
there are other established companies providing similar services
He added RM1.1b figure is not amount spent on Pharmaniaga each year
but for total purchase of the APPL drugs.
The logistics cost and profit to Pharmaniaga is fraction of that amount” he added
Dr Lee explained APPL drugs are purchased through tender every three years
tender board headed by MoH selects suppliers for APPL
Pharmaniaga handles logistics of APPL drugs from suppliers
to ensure timely delivery of drugs to all clinics, hospitals under MoH
Dr Lee points out Pharmaniaga's APPL drugs only 1/3 of RM1.1 billion purchase
other 2/3 are drugs not in APPL, bought by central contracts or quotations.
These drugs distributed by logistics service providers appointed by drug suppliers
Pharmaniaga supplies some APPL drugs but via tender, not direct to MoH
The supplier is decided by tender board, he explained
previously Pharmaniaga said 33% of ministry’s supplies come from Pharmaniaga
(OSTB : Huh ?? So does this mean Dr Lee the Dep Minister is also bullshitting?)
agreed with Guan Eng's suggestions to have healthy competition in drug supply
strive to encourage competition to ensure quality and value for money
contract with Pharmaniaga rests with Cabinet
Health Minister YB Donno could not respond in time
Pharmaniaga has not responded for comments
OSTB : To the Minister Dr Dzul, the Deputu Minister Dr Lee etc
Even if Pharmaniaga supplies 100% of the MOH's drug purchases it is ok.
But it must be on fully transparent, open tender basis.
NO MORE 25 YEAR CONCESSIONS.
NO MORE DIRECT NEGOTIATION BASIS.
But here is my suggestion.
RM3.3 billion is a lot of money.
You can catch many birds with this amount of money.
With this amount of money you can even minum air sambil berselam.
The MoH should spread this money around.
Do not concentrate so much money (even through open tender) with just one company or just a few big companies.
Spread the contracts around. Encourage more drug suppliers / pharmacies to become suppliers to the MoH.
Make the process super easy, transparent and make it online.
Let the most efficient, highest quality and affordable cost suppliers get the contracts.
Remember you are playing with taxpayers money.
Bukan duit bapak awak.
Then the cost of providing health care services to the taxpayers will be more just.
Then for the same amount of budget (RM3.3 billion etc) you will be able to provide MORE health services, better quality drugs, better quality equipment etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.